?a)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090901/184ad8fa/attachment.html
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090901/54dc6e8b/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4972 bytes
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090901/39e2c1f2/attachment.html
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OceanC_small.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4972 bytes
Hi!
In addition to deciding on archetypes to use, I believe circulating a
couple of complete instance examples fairly soon (this week?) would be
very helpful in detecting differences in specification
interpretations. Having more than one archetype editor certainly
helped detect differences and
4 matches
Mail list logo