technical
>
--
Alessandro Torrisi
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/ebc62322/attachment.html>
n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta
> Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
> *
> *
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/868dcf96/attachment.html>
erence" which adds a readonly element to definition.
So, what does it mean?
--
Best regards,
Igor Lizunov
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/5889e3bd/attachment.html>
planta
Valencia ? 46022 (Espa?a)
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/dc37d6c1/attachment.html>
ehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/034e7420/attachment.html>
Koray Atalag wrote:
> Hope this helps?You can look into the archetype: openEHR-EHR-
> OBSERVATION.MST_colon.v1
> Which used to come bundled with the AE installation.
Hi Koray,
The MST_colon archetype can still be downloaded from the old, obsolete
Subversion repository:
http://www.openehr.org
? ??? wrote:
> When right-clicking on any element in Archetype Editor there is link
> "Add reference" which adds a readonly element to definition.
>
> So, what does it mean?
Hi Igor,
It's an internal reference. See the ADL 1.4 specification, section
5.3.7.
- Peter Gummer
Peter Gummer wrote:
> Sebastian Garde wrote:
>
>
>> Not sure if this change would has an impact on the canonical MD5
>> hash generated by the Archetype Editor - ideally it would be the
>> same for an archetype with or without the concept clause?
>>
>
>
> I doubt it, Sebastian. Any sma
Sebastian Garde wrote:
> Not sure if this change would has an impact on the canonical MD5
> hash generated by the Archetype Editor - ideally it would be the
> same for an archetype with or without the concept clause?
I doubt it, Sebastian. Any small changes made to an archetype today
will
s.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100706/453dcdcb/attachment.html>
10 matches
Mail list logo