openEHR - Persistence of Data

2012-02-21 Thread Heath Frankel
-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/10b0ee3a/attachment.html

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34

2012-02-21 Thread Thomas Beale
was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/58db01b6/attachment.html

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34

2012-02-21 Thread William Goossen
a difference, in contrast to what Heath said. William -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/be2a90b6/attachment.html

openEHR-technical Digest, Vol 67, Issue 34

2012-02-21 Thread Peter Gummer
Hi William, I think you may have misread who wrote what. The assertion that HL7 is proprietary was made by Fred Trotter, not by Heath. Peter fred trotter wrote: ... Having said that, HL7 RIM is a proprietary ontology/model and OpenEHR, is not. William Goossen wrote: Ar this stage

FW: Meaningful Use and Beyond - O'Reilly press - errata

2012-02-21 Thread Shannon Tony (LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST)
Dear all, It's great to see some healthy debate over these issues of openEHR vs the rest of open source in healthcare. I know enough of Fred Trotters writings to know he must be a good guy, raising awareness of open source in healthcare for the common good. Equally I've been an advocate of

openEHR - Persistence of Data

2012-02-21 Thread Márcio Costa
/listinfo/openehr-technical -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/ac8050cb/attachment.html