-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/10b0ee3a/attachment.html
was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/58db01b6/attachment.html
a difference, in
contrast to what Heath said.
William
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/be2a90b6/attachment.html
Hi William,
I think you may have misread who wrote what. The assertion that HL7 is
proprietary was made by Fred Trotter, not by Heath.
Peter
fred trotter wrote:
...
Having said that, HL7 RIM is a proprietary ontology/model and OpenEHR, is
not.
William Goossen wrote:
Ar this stage
Dear all,
It's great to see some healthy debate over these issues of openEHR vs the
rest of open source in healthcare.
I know enough of Fred Trotters writings to know he must be a good guy, raising
awareness of open source in healthcare for the common good.
Equally I've been an advocate of
/listinfo/openehr-technical
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120221/ac8050cb/attachment.html
6 matches
Mail list logo