Ok Jan, that is your opinion, and with good reason, especially if you look
at the history of EN13606 and also, less emphasized, also OpenEhr.
OpenEhr has also as target, being a two level modeling system, as I wrote,
really being a big convenience.
Now there is a movement in En13606 of being a
On 29/08/2013 20:53, Bert Verhees wrote:
I think, it has to also some connection with the idea of one world
wide archetype-repository. But we found out in discussion, this will
never happen. So now, in the new ADL-standard, 1.5, there will be room
for namespace. Archetypes will not be
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/e72e674d/attachment-0001.html
On 08/30/2013 12:26 AM, Thomas Beale wrote:
On 29/08/2013 20:53, Bert Verhees wrote:
I think, it has to also some connection with the idea of one world
wide archetype-repository. But we found out in discussion, this will
never happen. So now, in the new ADL-standard, 1.5, there will be
/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/64b43b25/attachment.html
attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/ad1d82f6/attachment.html
for).
-
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/3393322e/attachment-0001.html
-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/4e023c51/attachment.html
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130830/64b43b25/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 3
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:58:17 +0100
From
9 matches
Mail list logo