Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/ADL 1.4

XT matches { > defining_code matches {[ac0001]} > } > > constraint_definitions = < > ["en"] = < > items = < > ["ac0001"] = < > text = <"New constraint"> > description = <"*"> > > > > > > > > > > constraint_bindings = < > ["BI98"] = < > items = < > ["ac0001"] = > ["ac0001"] = > > > > > > > > > Is it mandatory to use predefined subsets to define a coded value set > with multiple values in a constraint binging? > Isn't it reasonable to allow defining coded value sets explicitly at > the archetype level (specially in cases where maybe we only have to > define two or three codes)? > It would be a simple but very convenient patch to add to AOM/ADL 1.4+ > before 2.0. > > David > > - -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141030/8b19e0a0/attachment.html>

Defining multiple constraint bindings in AOM/ADL 1.4

o allow defining coded value sets explicitly at the archetype level (specially in cases where maybe we only have to define two or three codes)? It would be a simple but very convenient patch to add to AOM/ADL 1.4+ before 2.0. David -- David Moner Cano Grupo de Inform?tica Biom?dica - IBIME Instituto ITACA http://www.ibime.upv.es http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmoner Universidad Polit?cnica de Valencia (UPV) Camino de Vera, s/n, Edificio G-8, Acceso B, 3? planta Valencia - 46022 (Espa?a) -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20141030/cebfff48/attachment.html>

Volume of distinct "artifacts" made in openEHR

Hi ?ystein, There are some reports on CKM that show numbers of archetypes. languages etc Go to the Reports menu. The advanced search functionality on the main page can also look at both the formal archetype classification and optionally at key words and content. We try to avoid duplicating or o