RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
In that case, I don't understand the use case for the 'percent' and 'unitary' variants of the DV_PROPORTION data type. What are they for? Regards, Silje -Original Message- From: openEHR-technical On Behalf Of Thomas Beale Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 8:38 PM To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for % On 03/01/2019 08:37, David Moner wrote: > I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is > not a proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT. > > DV_PROPORTION should be only used when you want to maintain the > numerator and denominator explicitly separated, as a fraction, which > should not be the case with percentages. But it is true that the > definition of the type attribute in the specification is a bit > misleading: "Indicates semantic type of proportion, including percent, > unitary etc." David is right on all counts - use DV_QUANTITY, but we should fix that line in the specification. Can someone raise a PR on that please. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %
On 03/01/2019 08:37, David Moner wrote: I think DV_QUANTITY is the option here. Someone could argue that % is not a proper unit, but it is, both in UCUM and SNOMED CT. DV_PROPORTION should be only used when you want to maintain the numerator and denominator explicitly separated, as a fraction, which should not be the case with percentages. But it is true that the definition of the type attribute in the specification is a bit misleading: "Indicates semantic type of proportion, including percent, unitary etc." David is right on all counts - use DV_QUANTITY, but we should fix that line in the specification. Can someone raise a PR on that please. - thomas ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: Error in website
Thanks :-) Sent from my Xperia™ by Sony smartphone Thomas Beale wrote >Ths XSD and JSON repo folders did not have index files - we have added >some simple ones to display everything. We'll improve these over time. > >- thomas > >On 04/01/2019 14:20, Bert Verhees wrote: >> Don't know where to tell this, but there is something not okay on: >> >> https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/ITS/latest/index >> >> Many links don't work > > >___ >openEHR-technical mailing list >openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org >http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Re: Error in website
Ths XSD and JSON repo folders did not have index files - we have added some simple ones to display everything. We'll improve these over time. - thomas On 04/01/2019 14:20, Bert Verhees wrote: Don't know where to tell this, but there is something not okay on: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/ITS/latest/index Many links don't work ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
Error in website
Don't know where to tell this, but there is something not okay on: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/ITS/latest/index Many links don't work Bert ___ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
