For your interest, there is a Research Group in Spain that is
developing an ADL2OWL transformation
http://klt.inf.um.es/~cati/Adl2Owl.htm
Diego
--
Diego Bosc? Tom?s diebosto at fis.upv.es
yampeku at gmail.com
Grupo IBIME
Instituto ITACA - Universidad Polit?cnica de
Link to the wiki page?
2009/12/4 Erik Sundvall erik.sundvall at liu.se:
Thanks Sebastian!
You nicely adressed most of my concerns and seem to understand the problems.
Tom Sam: In this thread on Nov 17 I wrote Many people start problem
solving by a using a search engine, so that the
More people than you think still read and write ADL by hand, as
openEHR clinical model is not the only language you can build
archetypes (for instance, you can do archetypes of openEHR
demographics, CEN EN13606 clinical model or demographics). However,
it's true that available tools support or
This reminds me a thing. Would be useful to have at ADL level
something like postconditions? (In your example, something stating how
to obtain or validate MBP from available values). I think this falls
into knowledge level.
2009/7/25 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
Bert
Just found a post from a year ago about the topic that I wanted to
ask so I'm refloating it.
Is the openEHR Demographics XSD Schema going to be released soon?
If not, can I have a copy of the draft?
2008/4/22 Heath Frankel heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Erik,
Yes there was no
Last Friday I built an XSD schema following the openEHR demographics
model available on the openEHR web. I have been able to import it to
LinkEHR and do some test with the available demographic archetypes
(thanks Sergio) and seems to work well. I've uploaded it to the
LinkEHR webpage so anyone can
The archetype constraints the reference model, if something isn't
explicit on the archetype definition the default classes and
attributes from the reference model are assumed
2009/5/7 Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl:
I've been working through the demographic AT's that were provided by Sergio.
I haven't heard that anyone has developed it yet, but that is a very good idea
2009/10/5 gjb gjb at crs4.it:
I wonder if anyone has created themselves a syntax highlight file
for use with Notepad++
http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm
and would be willing to share it?
Gavin
I'm not a CDA specialist, but seems that CDA has its own archetypes now
http://motorcycleguy.blogspot.com/2009/09/ihe-profile-proposal-for-document.html
--
Diego Bosc? Tom?s diebosto at fis.upv.es
yampeku at gmail.com
Grupo IBIME
Instituto ITACA - Universidad
This is the mail that Catalina from Murcia University sent to the other lists
-
Hi,
I presented in the MIE conference at the end of August a poster
(http://www.hst.aau.dk/~ska/MIE2009/papers/MIE2009p0260.pdf) about a
ISO 13606 to OpenEHR and vice-versa converter. Some people asked for
me to
What about a person that is only used for family history for an
illness? Maybe you only know that the grandparent called 'John'
suffered from the same disease of your patient, but you don't know
much more about him.
2010/8/30 Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl:
Hi Sergio,
From a non-technical
There's also an opensource project called EHRFlex, which is an
archetype-based clinical registry system (EHR) independent of a
particular reference model. It uses clinical archetypes as guidelines
for the automatic generation of web interfaces, oriented to a clinical
use and data introduction.
So is there a final template schema/specification? Last thing I know is that
both Ocean and Zilics had their own schema for templates
2010/1/20 Sebastian Garde sebastian.garde at oceaninformatics.com
Dear all,
We have uploaded a new version of the Clinical Knowledge Manager:
The CKM
Reading your post I have remembered something I have read sometimes
but I haven't still gotten a satisfactory answer:
If UML and ADL are that similar, why don't we use both? What does UML
can express that ADL can not express that makes some people to dislike
it (and also what can ADL express that
Regarding Cluster, there is a code to tell if a cluster is a table or
a list, so the computer always knows which one was chosen
2010/11/9 Hugh Leslie hugh.leslie at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Andrew
I'm happy to continue to have this discussion with you.? I still am not sure
whether your
Hello Jesus,
You can find it under Archetype-Bulk export...
you must be logged in to view that menu (not sure why...)
2010/11/16 Jesus Bisbal jesus.bisbal at upf.edu
Dear all,
I'm sure this question is very easily answered, but I can't find a way
to download the whole archetype
shorter Tom Beale: Only by ignoring use cases can one design usable data
types?
I think is more like you don't have to look only the use cases to
design usable data types
heh. XML forever, it will solve every problem in the world. Just if
everyone else does it 'my' way, we'll be right.
I think the wiki is down
2010/11/22 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
On 22/11/2010 00:23, Stef Verlinden wrote:
Dear all,
As Ed Hammond said it somewhere earlier in this discussion: It's like
World Peace - a great idea but probably not achievable.
I agree with Ed if
Because I still believe that the Apgar score in HL7 v3 MUST be 100% identical
to the Apgar score in archetype. If that is not the case, both methods fail to
do what they are intented for.
I have to disagree with that. The apgar DCM is only one, but the
different representations in each one of
The concept (DCM) is the same, but the implementation in different
standards will differ, as two different standards will never have the
same way of representing the same concept. As DCM should be even
broader than archetypes and templates, generating them from the DCM
should not be dangerous at
Yeah, freemind XML is quite easy. I created a first version of a ADL (CEN
EN13606) to freemind converter in less than one day.
In my opinion the big drawback Freemind has at this moment is that it
doesn't display UTF-8 labels correctly (well, flash view does, but not
freemind program itself)
Shouldn't archetype identifiers and file names be separated?
2010/10/28 Peter Gummer peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com:
Erik Sundvall wrote:
openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.problem.v1.adls
? openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis.v1.adls
? ? ?openEHR-EHR-EVALUATION.diagnosis_sweden.v1.adls
Also, some of the restrictions of the identifier name seem arbitrary,
like minimum number of characters or what characters can you put.
2011/4/6 David Moner damoca at gmail.com:
Hello,
I like that approach regarding namespaces, it will be needed sooner than
later.
Related to archetype
That we are very cautious about reference model version changes
doesn't mean that any other organization does the same.
Look at HL7 v2 v3 for example ;)
2011/4/8 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 07/04/2011 12:07, David Moner wrote:
Dear Thomas,
I agree with your general
Hello
I have been working some time in DCM/archetype metadata. Dublin Core
is suitable for that, however, there is an ISO norm (ISO 15699. Health
informatics. Clinical knowledge resources. Metadata ) which is an
extension of Dublin Core for Health informatics and it's even more
suitable. They
Hello,
With the latest Demographic archetypes updates on the CKM I think we
have to be careful with archetype versioning. The new archetypes seem
quite different of the ones that were uploaded some time ago. They are
different on structure but the version of the archetype has not been
improved
So do you mean that only 23 (everything that is not draft) of the
current 270 archetypes on the CKM are 'safe' to be used? Everything
else could be completely changed in the next revision of the draft :(
2011/4/27 Ian McNicoll Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Diego,
For those who are
I am OK with all that, my only problem is that new iterations should
make new versions if changes are enough (even in draft status). If not
all current projects using archetypes will be just wrong with the
'official' current archetype in CKM
The situation of two incompatible archetypes with the
I still don't see the problem
If we wait until an archetype is published to care about versions then
you will have v2 or v3 archetypes as much, which in my opinion breaks
completely versioning purpose. What is the problem with having a v27
archetype? Is it less pretty?
2011/4/27 Ian McNicoll
2011/4/28 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 27/04/2011 10:44, Diego Bosc? wrote:
I still don't see the problem
If we wait until an archetype is published to care about versions then
you will have v2 or v3 archetypes as much, which in my opinion breaks
completely
and if you want to express something like 'a set with all the past
test results for this patient' (that could have none)?
it would be a constraint as you are only allowing some kinds of
entries (children of a certain Snomed code for example)
2011/12/5 Sam Heard sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com:
I have no problems on having different representations. In fact,
having different representations means more happy people, not less
(for example, people has been using RDF to describe archetypes for
some time).
Anyway I love this kind of threads, as are great to see new
perspectives and
After reading Pablo's post on domain types I am curious about how
should they be represented on each one of the different formats. I
feel they should be 'expanded' before trying to represent them in any
other format, but I might be wrong. Any ideas or opinions?
2011/12/8 Koray Atalag k.atalag at
This is the description from the project in GitHu
(https://github.com/skoba/ruby-impl-openehr)
This is the beta version 0.9.4 release of Ruby openEHR implementation
project. This release is still experimental preview of our work based
on openEHR specification release 1.0.2. We implemented almost
technically speaking, CLUSTER is already simpler in current 13606 model :)
2011/12/15 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com:
Great! this will be THE opportunity to think about an IM 2.0, and the first
topic on my wishlist is the simplification of ITEM_STRUCTURE children :D
--
Kind regards,
I am reading 1.0.2 IM and it says CARE_ENTRY, not GENERIC_ENTRY. which
one is the good one?
By the way, both ENTRY and CARE_ENTRY are abstract in openEHR. I don't
think you could only make ENTRY non-abstract without making CARE_ENTRY
non-abstract too (I think it has no sense to inherit an abstract
I have been doing some tests with the file archetype.xsd available on
the webpage and I have run with some problems.
The main one is regarding BaseTypes.xsd, which supposedly defines
types such as intervalOfInteger, intervalOfDate..., but doesn't
contain them. Documentation
ok, then the link of the XSD is pointing to an old version (link on
this page
http://www.openehr.org/svn/specification/TRUNK/publishing/its/XML-schema/index.html).
This is the page that can be reached through the openEHR website menu.
and the second issue is still true: types with CamelCase and
It is not 'wrong', I'm just saying that following the same syntax for
everything would be better. We had already a discussion about this on
this same list regarding same issues on other schema. I was just
pointing them out in case they need to be changed.
2011/12/21 Heath Frankel heath.frankel
Is much different to change the field from 'test
result:positive/negative' to 'test result positive:true/false'?
If the semantics if not the same then the 'positive/negative' has more
meaning that a simple boolean and I think they should be coded
2011/2/2 Koray Atalag k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz:
That seems a clear 'null flavour' use case
2011/2/2 Fabiane Bizinella Nardon fabiane at tridedalo.com.br:
I came across this problem several times. It became almost impossible to use
DV_BOOLEAN. The worst problem is that since DV_BOOLEAN has to be always true
or false, if someone simply does
I know it is on ADL specs, but why limit it to an URI? Second approach
could also be used to identify a subset
I understand the URI need, but I can think more than one occasion
where you have a defined termset and no URI for it
2011/2/18 Peter Gummer peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com:
Cati
If that is the valid way of defining in an URI form, it is
undocumented. the example should be put on the ADL specs.
And again not that difficult to support both kind of bindings. In my
opinion, ORGANIZATIONX::DrugFormSubset is way more human
readable and needs the same degree of 'computer
and also, binding to URL seems like a bad decision for archetype
maintainability
2011/2/21 Andrew Patterson andrewpatto at gmail.com:
Just to clarify some more, my contention is that you cannot
look inside a arbitrary URI to pick out values without
looking at the formal 'scheme' dependent
And just as a comment, in the ADL 1.4 specs the example shows a URL.
Maybe should be better if a URN was shown
2011/2/21 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com:
(just to clarify) I know that constraint bindings URIs are not actual
working URIs that you can get a-la HTTP, I understand that here
I would be also interested in this.
2011/3/1 Tiago Pedrosa pedrosa at ipb.pt:
Hi everyone,
? ? ? ?I'm looking for sampling OpenEHR records data. I will like to feed my
repository with some sample data to make some test and try new
services, does anyone knows where can I get that ?
? ? ?
Hello Koray,
ASTM sells the standard + the schema, so I think the only way to
obtain it is to buy it from them
http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2369.htm
regards
2011/7/11 Koray Atalag k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz:
Hi All, I need CCR model ASAP. has anyone worked on this. Possible to share?
Hello everyone,
I have been trying to found information about ADLs, but there is no
information on current (1.4) ADL document.
Searching the wiki for 'ADLs' doesn't work as returns all 'ADL' results.
Do you know where the documentation about ADLs can be found?
Regards
I mean ADLs as referenced here
http://www.openehr.org/224-OE.html
.adls, for 'ADL source' files, allowing specialised archetypes to be
represented 'differentially' (like object-oriented subclasses)
2011/6/21 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
Diego,
if you mean the ADL 1.5
Thanks, that is what I was looking for
2011/6/21 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
For the tool, see
http://www.openehr.org/svn/ref_impl_eiffel/TRUNK/apps/adl_workbench/doc/web/index.html
For the wiki page see here - you can see a lot of examples here.
otherwise see the
For the lack of responses I assume that they are not available. Is
there at least an openEHR XML instance validator? we could try to make
the instances from scratch and validate them.
2011/3/1 Jesus Bisbal jesus.bisbal at upf.edu
I second that. Very interested.
I posted a similar request to
You can define openEHR demographic archetypes with LinkEHR
2011/3/8 Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl:
Just for considering,
It would be a nice thing if GENERIC_ENTRY was an option in the
Archetype-Editor
(also demographics, but that is an old discussion)
Thanks,
Bert Verhees
I think it is because of parsing collisions. I don't really see
another point to obligate the hours in a date_time
2011/3/18 Ian McNicoll Ian.McNicoll at oceaninformatics.com:
Thanks Peter / Thomas,
This is quite important and I had not appreciated the limitations on the use
of partial dates
Hello,
So I was looking to the Text package in the data_types specification
and I was wondering how is supposed a DV_CODED_TEXT to handle a
post-coordinated term (from for example SNOMED). If I understand
correctly is something that relies in a supposed terminology service?
isn't doing that
But then if we want to communicate this coded string outside from our
openEHR system would be impossible to know 100% what it is. I don't
get the point of having 'mappings' (which could also be done by a
terminology service) and not having a 'qualifiers' or whatever.
Doesn't Loinc also allow
I will suggest a new optional section on the ADL, if those conditions
end in the archetype tree structure it could really be a mess.
So if you just want to look for the structure you only have to ignore
that section
2011/3/23 Heath Frankel heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Seref,
I
Maybe we could use as inspiration all the available XML to GUI efforts
that already exist. Mostly to avoid reinventing the wheel
2011/3/25 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com:
Hi Koray,
I think we are the core group, and if we can agree some basic notation of
some basic GUI directives
Hello Thomas,
Some questions about the example available at the SVN
(http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge2/TRUNK/archetypes/openEHR_examples/ehr_extract_template/Working/Templates/ehr_extract/openEHR-EHR_EXTRACT-EXTRACT.t_basic_acute.v1.adls)
- What does the next snippet mean?
use_archetype
And again, why 'closed' and not occurrences {0}? Is really needed to
include a new reserved word when you already have the way of
expressing this?
When you resolve a use_archetype while generating the instance you
will put the data, not a reference to it. On the other hand, the model
tells you
Although this would work, I think that it would make ADL far less
readable and would oblige people to know always the reference model
underneath AND their parent archetype (if for some reason the parent
archetype is not available then you are completely screwed). Even if
you say that people should
My suggestion is for the this point
Begin an open source software project for tools, web-based if
possible, to author archetypes, templates and terminology reference
sets directly interacting with the Clinical Knowledge Manager and
equivalent repository and review tools
I agree with the first
In my experience. you only need 2 or 3 CKM web services: search (with
different kinds of search) download. I think those two are really
basic, and are also the ones that every repository must have (and
depending on the application, those are enough). Some of the other web
services (like freemind
Good to hear about you! I hope everything is ok in Japan.
I would encourage you to put the archetypes on the CKM anyway, as I would
say that most of the available archetypes on the repository are in the
same situation as your archetypes (the implicit 'use under your own
responsibility')
2011/9/6
There are already epSOS EN13606 archetypes
http://www.epsos.eu/uploads/tx_epsosfileshare/D3.5.2_Appendix_G_EN13606_Implementation.pdf
2011/9/9 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 09/09/2011 14:01, Stef Verlinden wrote:
Great initiative. Let's go for it. Even though I agree
What part do you said is copied? ._.
Here the archetypes in ADL
http://en13606.webs.upv.es/web13606/index.php/activities/ceniso-13606-workshop-mie2011-oslo
2011/9/9 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
Diego,
Are the archetypes online anywhere?
As an aside, it is an interesting
I currently don't have the norm with me, I'll check it on Monday morning.
Second case looks like a typo on the schema, thanks for pointing it
out. We will check it and correct it.
We created a 13606 XML Schema (because there was none available)
trying to follow the specifications (as we also did
yes, what I mean is attributes like ID or even invalid characters in
the names (like ':'). This is a problem with the parser (and also with
classes identifiers)
2011/9/10 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 10/09/2011 12:59, Diego Bosc? wrote:
This kind of problems has given
ADL parser.
and I am not saying it should be allowed, just that this kind of
things happen :)
2011/9/10 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Diego,
I am not sure I understand that one - ':' is indeed illegal in most class /
property identification systems - are you saying it
':' are not valid as names in most operating systems, so it would be a
problem even for adl file names. That's why I don't think it is wise
to allow this one in particular.
The other issue was already 'discussed' on the list
http://www.openehr.org/mailarchives/openehr-technical/msg05294.html
I
Great job Pablo!
2012/12/4 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com:
Hi all, I've uploaded the ADL syntax highlighter for Notepad++ at the
spanish openEHR portal: http://openehr.org.es/cms2/display/recursos
This will be our main resource page, you are welcome to contribute.
--
Kind regards,
This is a simple question: Why does a simple archetype slot like this (ADL)
allow_archetype ELEMENT[at0001] occurrences matches {0..*} matches {
-- Archetype slot
include
archetype_id/value matches {/.*/}
}
ends up like this?
children xsi:type=ARCHETYPE_SLOT
So has AQL been selected as the official openEHR query language?
2012/1/4 Seref Arikan serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com:
Greetings,
The AQL grammar from the wiki has direct and indirect left recursion. Which
means without changes in the grammar, LL parser generators (both JavaCC and
Put a couple of comments on the wiki, but I think it is a thing that
should be discussed on the list.
In ADL 1.5 a flag 'pass_through' was added. Its definition is 'Allows
nodes required for structuring data but otherwise redundant for screen
display and reporting to be detected by rendering
In ADL, the assumed value of a domain type is marked like this:
defining_code matches {
[local::
at1000, -- Standing
at1001, -- Sitting
at1002, -- Reclining
I am using XMLserializer from Java implementation
2012/1/6 Heath Frankel heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com:
Diego,
What tool are you using to generate your AOM XML?
The tool issue tracker may be a more appropriate place for these tooling
issues.
Heath
On 05/01/2012 10:34 PM, Diego
When I was trying to validate an archetype with the reference model
(openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.apgar), I found something strange on all
'event' archetypes.
The EVENT class has a function (method) that calculates the offset.
However, in that archetype the offset was restricted as if it was an
Oh, this is the first time I have heard that functions can be
constrained. However, AOM specifications say otherwise:
C_attribute: a node representing a constraint on an attribute
(i.e. UML ?relationship? or
?primitive attribute?) in an object type; (AOM specifications, page 12)
This
If you still say that properties can be restricted, then current
stable validated bmm files are incorrect, as they are currently
missing 90% of stored properties (all methods without parameters),
like all the ones in ITEM_TABLE.
2012/1/10 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On
If it is really needed for the moment for representing templates then
it's OK with me (as long as we agree that this is a temporal thing),
but I still feel that having two separated places to rule UI
generation is a bad idea.
I think that annotations could work for you (even creating a new
No, but they can be used for different things, from creating specific
editors, to mindmaps or sample GUI generation
2012/1/13 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On 13/01/2012 08:46, Diego Bosc? wrote:
visible, allowed types, icon...
ok - I understood those were settings
Or simply using an assertion on the first place?
2012/1/15 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
A nicer approach could be as follows:
we allow 'computed' attributes in the RM definition used by archetype tools,
which will allow archetypes to be very clear and nice, e.g. in the
After checking the schema, I have seen some places that the schema
(specifically basetypes.xsd) is missing things that are indeed
supported by ADL (namely assumed_values, lists, etc.)
What is the process to update the schema?
We have included in LinkEHR a mindmap (freemind) generic
transformation based on AOM and we also use Freemind Flash Browser to
visualize it. Visualization is not the same as the one in CKM (as I
told is generic, see this example http://i.imgur.com/FlLFY.png) and if
you pass our LinkEHR reference
Would this attribute value change depending on where is the archetype
used? i.e. if we use it on a GUI of a smartphone rather than a
standalone or web application
2012/1/25 David Moner damoca at gmail.com:
2012/1/25 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Maybe another way of
Hello Pablo,
The way for accessing an archetype on the CKM from an URL is to build
a URL similar to this
http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/#showArchetypeById_openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.lab_test-lipids.v1
I think she is referring to something like if patient is male then
obstetrics field should be null, and those are created as invariants
2012/7/19 pablo pazos pazospablo at hotmail.com:
Hi Leysan,
Archetypes are for content definition, not to define rules on field
displaying on GUI.
That
I sent this email when I thought the migration process was over, but
it wasn't. I am sending it again, sorry if someone receives two copies
:)
Is there any place where openEHR local terminology files (e.g. the
possible values from C_DV_QUANTITY.property or
DV_CODED_TEXT.defining_code) can be
Hello Bert,
We created a XML Schema for the demographics part some time ago. You
can download it from here.
http://pangea.upv.es/linkehr/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/Demographics.xsd
Regards
2012/11/26 Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl:
Hi,
I was studying the OpenEHR XSD files, I found
I didn't realize that the XSD file has no license. Please assume a
CC-BY license, which is the same we use for 13606 schemas.
2012/11/28 Erik Sundvall erik.sundvall at liu.se:
Hi!
I see several use cases for sending and storing XML pieces smaller
than compositions etc as valid XML documents.
Well, last time I checked the serialization and the schema this was
one of the things I was not sure which was correct. I have to get some
time to modify the schema with the missing things I detected some time
ago
2012/3/29 Sebastian Garde sebastian.garde at oceaninformatics.com:
The XML
Yes, but what I mean is this
DV_ORDINAL [at0006] matches {
value matches {|2|}
symbol matches {
DV_CODED_TEXT matches {
value matches {???} --
value is obligatory and I don't know what to put there
yeah, but you are fixing everything else, because this is an
alternative that would be chosen as a whole (if defining code is
local::at0003 and value is 2 then dv_coded_text.value should also be
fixed to whatever value is decided)
2012/4/4 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com:
On
Trojan, DO NOT OPEN
Is the at from the solved slot lost? Is not possible to redefine
the text or description and change it from the at of the included
slot?
I think it would be useful to have it somehow
2012/5/2 Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Hi Pablo,
when archetypes are flattened,
Also, are the at from the resolved template changed in any way?
I see EXTRACT_CHAPTER with [at0002] and ELEMENT with [at0002.1], which
I think it may be changing specialization semantics
2012/5/2 Diego Bosc? yampeku at gmail.com:
Is the at from the solved slot lost? Is not possible to
I would say the scope of that repository is different, as that is part
of the test for current evolving 1.5 syntax and does not include
'real' archetypes
2012/5/6 Peter Gummer peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com:
Hi Pablo,
It makes more sense to me to add all of that to the existing
Pablo also mentioned 'RM instances in a variety of formats', which are
not 'artefacts'.
2012/5/7 Peter Gummer peter.gummer at oceaninformatics.com:
Diego Bosc? wrote:
I would say the scope of that repository is different, as that is part
of the test for current evolving 1.5 syntax and does
I'm working on that, but the instances that are being generated for
the moment still need some further processing to be considered
clinically valid (e.g. if archetype says that a number 1000 is
expected, one valid value is -1234567, which makes no sense from a
clinical perspective). It needs works
A more realistic example:
http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/8431/8566bdf17b8b46ad85acbb3.png
definition
COMPOSITION[at] occurrences matches {1..1} matches { -- HIV report
content existence matches {0..1} cardinality matches {1..2;
ordered; unique} matches {
Hello all,
I have been thinking a little about archetype specialization and versioning
and how do those two relate. I don't know how it is being solved right now,
but seems like a big issue for the future. Take the following scenario:
We have an archetype (e.g.
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
