Dear all:
My name is Isabel Rom?n.
I?m working in a demographic server. In a first version only Person information
is considered and I?m using Demographic Reference Model to represent it. I
would like to know if the Reference Model is going to be extended with PERSON
attributes or if it is only
Dear Thomas
Sorry for my english.
I have been working in a model for demographic server since my old mail, so
I have make some improvements in my model.
I?m agree with you, perhaps person attributes has to be included in an
arquetype for demographics, not in the reference model, that is what I?m
Dear Thomas
Sorry for my english.
I have been working in a model for demographic server since my old mail, so
I have make some improvements in my model.
I?m agree with you, perhaps person attributes has to be included in an
arquetype for demographics, not in the reference model, that is what I?m
Dear all,
I continue working with archetypes for demographics, and trying to express them
in owl.
I have written the archetype for location_address that is provided in the web
in ADL format in owl.
It is based in the openEHR information model, written too in owl.
The archetype is in the url:
Sorry for my intrusion and my english.
I think all of you are agree in some aspects.
But I think that high level ontology languages as owl have enought potential
to represent archetypes and you have tools to write in this language or
parse owl files and the devolopment of new tools is easy thanks
The ICMCC Event
June 1-3, 2005
NCC, The Hague
The Leading International Event on
ICT in Medicine and Care
Call for Workshops and Symposia
http://www.icmcc2005.com/
-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
Hello every body,
Sorry for my intrusion. I?m working with demographic models, so this
discussion about the concept age is interesting for me.
I think that the only demographic valid concept of age is the difference
between the actual date and the birth date. We can include a very close
concept
In my opinion the best design is to have one schema per information model.
This facilitate a logical division of the designed types and to keept in
mind the reference model. The use of namespaces is a good idea to clarify
thinks (I belive). To use this philosophy for representing RM in OWL gives
Dear Thomas,
I think it is a good idea.
Best Regards,
Isabel
El 15/12/2011 10:01, Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos escribi?:
Dear Thomas,
The creation of this list will be an excellent contribution to promote
the harmonization process. In my opinion the alignment of these two
initiatives is a
Dear friends,
in this URL
http://www.medicon2013.com/images/site/1stCFP_MEDICON2013.pdf you could
find the first Call for papers for the Medicon 2013 conference, to be
held in Sevilla (Spain)
If you think it would be interesting to have a special session or
workshop in the conference we could
Dear friends,
ISO12967, in particular part 3, should be considered as a very good
reference about how to define actual practical services.
Of course the reference model in this standard is different from the
openEHR RM, but some key ideas are very interesting and, in my opinion,
provide a
Hi Bert,
Sorry for my bad english.
I think that any aproximation is a viewpoint of a problem and that you
can solve the same problem from different viewpoints, using different
paradigms. The problem is to choose the optimal and when you have no
options that mix differents paradigms to find the
12 matches
Mail list logo