2006/12/19, Williamtfgoossen at cs.com <Williamtfgoossen at cs.com>: > > In een bericht met de datum 18-12-2006 18:00:54 West-Europa > (standaardtijd), schrijft mattias.forss at gmail.com: > > > Maybe you're right, the definitions could be added as comments, but for > proprietary terminology like SNOMED CT this will mean that these kind of > archetypes can only be distributed to people that have paid the license. > > > > Sorry, but Snomed CT cannot be considered a proprietary terminology given > the formal international SDO status from January onward.
We'll see about that. Read about the issues with SNOMED and LOINC here http://library.ahima.org/xpedio/groups/public/documents/ahima/bok1_032401.html Mattias Further, most English speaking countries (Cnd, UK, US, Aus, Nw Zealand) > already have a national licence allowing everyone to use it for health > purposes. > > William Goossen > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061219/cc6df49c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
