mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of
*David Moner
*Sent:* Friday, 13 November 2009 9:09 PM
*To:* For openEHR technical discussions
*Subject:* DV_DATE definition mismatch
Hello everybody,
I have detected what it seems a mismatch between the DV_DATE
discussions
Subject: DV_DATE definition mismatch
Hello everybody,
I have detected what it seems a mismatch between the DV_DATE definition of
the reference model and the ADL parser/AOM model specifications.
At the RM, the DV_DATE value is defined as a String constrained as an
ISO8601 pattern
+61 (0) 8 7127 5574
*From:* openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto:
openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *David Moner
*Sent:* Friday, 13 November 2009 9:09 PM
*To:* For openEHR technical discussions
*Subject:* DV_DATE definition mismatch
Hello everybody
Hello everybody,
I have detected what it seems a mismatch between the DV_DATE definition of
the reference model and the ADL parser/AOM model specifications.
At the RM, the DV_DATE value is defined as a String constrained as an
ISO8601 pattern. This is both at the RM specification and at the XML
In a message dated 13-11-2009 12:22:04 W. Europe Standard Time,
damoca at gmail.com writes:
There are two possible solutions. Or the RM is changed to represent
correctly the DV_DATE value as a xs:date type with the appropriate ISO8601
facet or the archetypes should take the form
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091113/998daa9b/attachment.html
6 matches
Mail list logo
