Should we consider user_identity archetype into ckm so you can reuse?
Heath
On Jul 3, 2013 8:10 PM, Athanasios Anastasiou
athanasios.anastasiou at plymouth.ac.uk wrote:
Hello Heath Sam
Thank you very much for the helpful replies, it was good to see i am
somewhat on the right track too.
Hello Heath
Thank you very much, it would perhaps be good to have it as an
example...At the moment i am more interested in the technique. I would
have to add quite a few things to what i have implemented so far before
i can make full use of such an Archetype.
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
Hello Heath Sam
Thank you very much for the helpful replies, it was good to see i am
somewhat on the right track too.
All the best
Athanasios Anastasiou
On 02/07/2013 00:43, Heath Frankel wrote:
Hi Athanasios,
As Sam said, the Ocean Multiprac application suite (www.multiprac.com
Hi Athanasios,
As Sam said, the Ocean Multiprac application suite (www.multiprac.com) does
this. I have a PERSON.person-individual_provider that has a ROLE.user as
well as a ROLE.healthcare_provider, so your user who is a provider has both
user roles and healthcare roles.
Similarly I have a
Hi Anthanasios - Heath has been doing something like that
Sam Heard
FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI
Consultant Chairman, Ocean Informatics
Chairman, openEHR Foundation
Chairman, NTGPE
Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London
From: Athanasios Anastasiou
Sent: ?Monday?, ?1?
Hello everyone
Would it be good practice to use the demographics package to describe
both the patients for which data are available in a system but also the
users of the system?
As far as the first part is concerned, the demographics package provides
a very good level of detail for describing
6 matches
Mail list logo
