RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-20 Thread Sebastian Garde
ct: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML I think the primitive is string with ISO 8601 format, so ISO8601_DURATION might be correct. Sent from my LG Mobile -- Original message-- From: Sebastian Garde Date: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 09:36 To: For openEHR technical discu

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-18 Thread pazospablo
I think the primitive is string with ISO 8601 format, so ISO8601_DURATION might be correct. Sent from my LG Mobile -- Original message--From: Sebastian GardeDate: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 09:36To: For openEHR technical discussions;Subject:rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive

RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-18 Thread pablo pazos
://cabolabs.com From: sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org Subject: RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:45:19 + Yes, that seems be another possible interpretation of the specs. So, it could

RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Sebastian Garde
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Heath Frankel Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 21:22 To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in X

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Heath Frankel
suggest all tools are updated to use String to align with the spec. Regards Heath _ From: Diego Boscá <yamp...@gmail.com<mailto:yamp...@gmail.com>> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:32 AM Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive o

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Boštjan Lah
, 15. März 2016 14:04 To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>> Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type is being assigned to both th

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Diego Boscá
ists.openehr.org] > On Behalf Of Diego Boscá > Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 14:04 > To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> > Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML > > Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATI

RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Sebastian Garde
..@lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Diego Boscá Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 14:04 To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org> Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Diego Boscá
Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type is being assigned to both the C_Complex_object and the C_Primitive_object rm_type_name, which is surely wrong. 2016-03-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Boštjan Lah : > Hi, > > according to the specs it's String: >

Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Boštjan Lah
Hi, according to the specs it's String: http://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/docs/data_types/data_types.html#_dv_duration_class That's what template designer does. Best regards, Bostjan On 15 Mar 2016, at 13:35, Sebastian Garde

rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML

2016-03-15 Thread Sebastian Garde
Dear all, There are a differences in how the Template Designer and how CKM construct the XML for a DV_Duration: Take this snippet (from http://openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.123_XML ) DV_DURATION true