ct: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML
I think the primitive is string with ISO 8601 format, so ISO8601_DURATION might
be correct.
Sent from my LG Mobile
-- Original message--
From: Sebastian Garde
Date: Tue, Mar 15, 2016 09:36
To: For openEHR technical discu
I think the primitive is string with ISO 8601 format, so ISO8601_DURATION
might be correct.
Sent from my LG Mobile
-- Original message--From: Sebastian GardeDate: Tue, Mar 15, 2016
09:36To: For openEHR technical discussions;Subject:rm_type_name for the
DV_DURATIONs primitive
://cabolabs.com
From: sebastian.ga...@oceaninformatics.com
To: openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org
Subject: RE: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 08:45:19 +
Yes, that seems be another possible interpretation of the specs.
So, it could
From: openEHR-technical [mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Heath Frankel
Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 21:22
To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in X
suggest all tools are updated to use String to align with the spec.
Regards
Heath
_
From: Diego Boscá <yamp...@gmail.com<mailto:yamp...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive o
, 15. März 2016 14:04
To: For openEHR technical discussions
<openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org<mailto:openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>>
Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML
Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type is being assigned to both th
ists.openehr.org]
> On Behalf Of Diego Boscá
> Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 14:04
> To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
> Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML
>
> Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATI
..@lists.openehr.org] On
Behalf Of Diego Boscá
Sent: Dienstag, 15. März 2016 14:04
To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org>
Subject: Re: rm_type_name for the DV_DURATIONs primitive object in XML
Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type
Agree with bostjan, In fact DV_DURATION type is being assigned to both
the C_Complex_object and the C_Primitive_object rm_type_name, which is
surely wrong.
2016-03-15 13:42 GMT+01:00 Boštjan Lah :
> Hi,
>
> according to the specs it's String:
>
Hi,
according to the specs it's String:
http://www.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/docs/data_types/data_types.html#_dv_duration_class
That's what template designer does.
Best regards,
Bostjan
On 15 Mar 2016, at 13:35, Sebastian Garde
Dear all,
There are a differences in how the Template Designer and how CKM construct the
XML for a DV_Duration:
Take this snippet (from http://openehr.org/ckm/#showArchetype_1013.1.123_XML )
DV_DURATION
true
11 matches
Mail list logo