RE: Syntax for including archetypes in SLOTs, regardless of version

2019-01-07 Thread Bakke, Silje Ljosland
Amen. So, do we have a conclusion that toolmakers can reference? Can we document this somewhere in the specs or elsewhere? Regards, Silje From: openEHR-technical On Behalf Of Heather Leslie Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 7:22 AM To: For openEHR technical discussions Subject: RE: Syntax

RE: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %

2019-01-07 Thread Bakke, Silje Ljosland
I think maybe actual modelling practice should be taken into account here. Since these guidelines haven't been available, several important percentages in published archetypes have been modelled as DV_PROPORTION: openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.inspired_oxygen.v1

Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %

2019-01-07 Thread Ian McNicoll
Hi Silje, As you say, I think this a case of emerging clarity (or less fog of confusion!!) as the various use-cases emerge. As the primary author of both these archetypes, in retrospect I would probably keep inspired_oxygen as DV_PROPORTION and change pulse_oximetry to DV_QUANTITY but!!! I do not

Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %

2019-01-07 Thread Thomas Beale
one thing to note: DV_PROPORTION is a more complex data structure. I would be tempted to try to determine what use has been made of this archetype so far - i.e. in creating real data. If no real data has been created, then it could in theory be changed. - thomas On 07/01/2019 12:11, Ian

Re: DV_PROPORTION vs DV_QUANTITY for %

2019-01-07 Thread Ian McNicoll
Simple answer - loads of real data - pulse_oximetry and Oxygen levels will have been recorded hundreds of thousands if not millions of times in patient data - and Proportion *is* the correct datatype for O2 levels. Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: