Dario Liberman wrote:
Well,
In this case, I recommend to add a kind of actor, that may be de aggregation
of other actors. The administrator may decide which capabilities or roles
this new actor may have, since it doesn't necessarily need to have anything
in common with the aggregation of the
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Subject: Re: Archetype rules (invariants) in openEHR RM?
Ahmad Risk wrote:
Please let me enetr this dialogue. In the UK, a GP might refer a
patient to a named Cardiologist. However, that referral, upon arrival
at the hospital, might be handled
Dario Liberman wrote:
Hello!
Nice site redesign you have got at openEHR.org :-)
I have taken a look at the Demographic R.M. 1.2
I was wondering if it a Party may be also a team or group of people.
currently a PARTY can be an ACTOR - viz PERSON, ORGANISATION, or AGENT,
or else it is a ROLE.
into the picture?
Thanks,
Dario Liberman.
liberman at ineba.net
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Beale tho...@deepthought.com.au
To: Dario Liberman liberman at ineba.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 22:21
Subject: Re: Archetype rules (invariants) in openEHR RM?
Dear Dario,
the new
Gavin Brelstaff wrote:
How do we generate archetype rules to provide constraints
internally within archetypes.
We would like to use such rules to constrain data at it's point of
entry on the client. We already generate handler code (in Javascript)
to ensure the data-type and range constraints
5 matches
Mail list logo
