Hi,

My impression is that IHTSDO prioritize collaboration with organizations with 
products that are actively used in IHTSDO:s member countries. I guess that 
might be the reason why collaboration with for example WHO (ICD, ICF), 
Regenstrief Institute (LOINC) and International Council of Nurses (ICNP) have 
been prioritized in favor of openEHR. Proprietary information models are also 
more common than openEHR models and collaboration with the organizations 
(companies) behind the proprietary information models are probably done via 
IHTSDO's Vendor Liaison Forum.

        Regards
        Mikael


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] För 
Hardiker Nicholas
Skickat: den 28 september 2015 18:58
Till: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org>
Ämne: RE: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

While the reasons for collaboration may be different, I felt like I should 
report that we have been working very successfully under a collaboration 
agreement between the International Council of Nurses and IHTSDO on the 
development of equivalency tables between the International Classification for 
Nursing Practice (ICNP) and SNOMED CT. I have no reason to doubt the 
possibility a similar arrangement between the openEHR Foundation and IHTSDO. 

With best wishes
 
Nick
 
Nick Hardiker RN PhD FACMI
Professor of Nursing and Health Informatics | Associate Dean (Research & 
Innovation) School of Nursing, Midwifery, Social Work & Social Sciences MS1.12, 
Mary Seacole Building, University of Salford, Salford  M6 6PU
t: +44 (0) 161 295 7013
n.r.hardi...@salford.ac.uk | www.salford.ac.uk 
www.seek.salford.ac.uk/profiles/HARDIKER514.jsp
 
Director, eHealth Programme, International Council of Nurses Professor 
(Adjunct), College of Nursing, University of Colorado Denver, USA 
Editor-in-Chief, Informatics for Health and Social Care
 



-----Original Message-----
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Mikael Nyström
Sent: 27 September 2015 17:08
To: For openEHR clinical discussions; Openehr-Technical
Subject: RE: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)

Hi Tom,

I found the responsible person at IHTSDO for the collaboration with openEHR 
Foundation. According to her, there are active discussions to be able to soon 
sign a collaborative agreement between IHTSDO and openEHR and then continue to 
work with how SNOMED CT and openEHR artefacts practically can be used together.

IHTSDO also states over and over again that SNOMED CT needs to be implemented 
together with good information models to reach its full potential and IHTSDO 
hosted (at least) the CIMI autumn meeting in Amsterdam last year. I therefore 
don't understand your very negative attitude towards IHTSDO collaboration Tom.

        Regards
        Mikael


-----Original Message-----
From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] On 
Behalf Of Thomas Beale
Sent: den 26 september 2015 06:36
To: openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org; Openehr-Technical
Subject: Re: openEHR and IHTSDO (SNOMED CT)


A number of approaches have been made in the recent past by openEHR and CIMI, 
led by Dr stan Huff. The outcome is that IHTSDO do not appear to be currently 
interested in a formal working relationship with the content modelling 
communities (openEHR, Intermountain Healthcare, CIMI, ISO 13606, ...).

I personally don't understand why, but this is the line they are taking. 
I'm not aware of any new plans.

None of this precludes openEHR actively using IHTSDO-issued standards and 
specifications, which we do. ADL / AOM 2 and tooling has now been converted to 
using IHTSDO concept referencing URIs for example.

- thomas

On 25/09/2015 18:26, Mikael Nyström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if there are any current collaborations or collaboration 
> plans between openEHR Foundation and IHTSDO (which is the organisation 
> that owns and maintains SNOMED CT.)
>
>       Regards
>       Mikael
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.opene
> hr.org
>


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openehr-clini...@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to