On 10/26/19 12:45 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:51:27AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
>> On 10/25/19 3:04 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> ...
>>> Did anyone already bring up the idea of piggy-backing security support
>>> from a different distribution?
>> Is this just taking patches
On Oct 26, 2019, at 15:37, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 10:34:44AM -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
>> ...
>> To avoid YP users assuming that YP and/or the upstream kernel has done
>> hardware testing for YP LTS, we may want to document specific testing
>> actions that are expected
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 07:51:27AM -0700, akuster808 wrote:
> On 10/25/19 3:04 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Did anyone already bring up the idea of piggy-backing security support
> > from a different distribution?
> Is this just taking patches from Ubuntu and getting them applied to the
>
On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 10:34:44AM -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
>...
> To avoid YP users assuming that YP and/or the upstream kernel has done
> hardware testing for YP LTS, we may want to document specific testing actions
> that are expected from YP LTS users. E.g. should YP downstreams work
>
On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 10:34 -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 7:11 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 16:04 -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
> > > There may be lessons in Microsoft's move from diverse hardware to
> > > VM-
> > > based testing:
> > >
On Oct 26, 2019, at 7:11 AM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 16:04 -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
>> There may be lessons in Microsoft's move from diverse hardware to VM-
>> based testing:
>>
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 16:04 -0400, Rich Persaud wrote:
> There may be lessons in Microsoft's move from diverse hardware to VM-
> based testing:
> https://www.ghacks.net/2019/09/23/former-microsoft-employee-explains-why-bugs-in-windows-updates-increased/
I don't disagreed, real hardware does have
