I think this is a reasonable proposal, and one that should be able to be
implemented fairly easily within the layer index code (and I'll help do it).
One problem with automated processes however is getting notification when they
are malfunctioning. Case in point, the layer index is currently
On 12/21/19 12:57 PM, akuster808 wrote:
>
>
> On 12/20/19 5:37 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>> I am proposing the following as a new policy for the layers in the layer
>> index.
>> Recently I have been working with the layer index and it's become clear that
>> 'master' is pretty much unusable as it
On 12/20/19 5:37 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> I am proposing the following as a new policy for the layers in the layer
> index.
> Recently I have been working with the layer index and it's become clear that
> 'master' is pretty much unusable as it stands. Below is my proposal to clean
> this up and
I am proposing the following as a new policy for the layers in the layer index.
Recently I have been working with the layer index and it's become clear that
'master' is pretty much unusable as it stands. Below is my proposal to clean
this up and keep it clean. In addition to the proposal, at the
