Re: [docs] [Openembedded-architecture] proposal: allow Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream in patches

2021-12-14 Thread Mark Hatle
On 12/14/21 5:38 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 11:27 +, Ross Burton wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 10:38, Alexander Kanavin wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 11:30, Michael Opdenacker wrote: Are you suggesting to expand the official Yocto Project docs on this topic?

Re: [docs] [Openembedded-architecture] proposal: allow Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream in patches

2021-12-14 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2021-12-14 at 11:27 +, Ross Burton wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 10:38, Alexander Kanavin > wrote: > > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 11:30, Michael Opdenacker > > wrote: > > > > > > Are you suggesting to expand the official Yocto Project docs on this > > > topic? > > > Actually,

Re: [docs] [Openembedded-architecture] proposal: allow Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream in patches

2021-12-14 Thread Ross Burton
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 10:38, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 11:30, Michael Opdenacker > wrote: >> >> Are you suggesting to expand the official Yocto Project docs on this topic? >> Actually, I only see >>

Re: [docs] [Openembedded-architecture] proposal: allow Upstream-Status: Inactive-Upstream in patches

2021-12-14 Thread Alexander Kanavin
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 11:30, Michael Opdenacker < michael.opdenac...@bootlin.com> wrote: > Are you suggesting to expand the official Yocto Project docs on this topic? > Actually, I only see > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev-manual/common-tasks.html#patching-code > which explains the use of