Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/7] ed: Fix EXTRA_OECONF to ensure right compiler is found

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/14/2011 10:56 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote: +EXTRA_OECONF = 'CC=${CC}' 'CXX=${CXX}' 'CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}' 'CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS}' 'CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS}' 'LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}' + hmm why doesnt it pick it from environment in

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/7] sstate: Add SSTATE_SCAN_FILES

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/14/2011 05:50 PM, Saul Wold wrote: This allows recipes to specify files that may be outside the normal set for inclusion when there are hardcoded paths that need to be fixmepathed to work correctly. Signed-off-by: Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 11

[OE-core] SPDX vs LICENSE field valid licenses

2011-12-15 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Hi all, I want to ask which license style is currently the preferred one? At license.bbclass this comment appears: # Standards are great! Everyone has their own. In an effort to standardize licensing # names, common-licenses will use the SPDX standard license names. In order to not # break

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/9] kernel.bbclass: compile kernel and modules in a single task

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 14 dec. 2011, om 01:17 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 12/13/2011 08:19 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: There is no point in compiling kernel modules in a separate task, run right

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] conf/machine/include/arm add extra MACHINEOVERRIDES like x86 does

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 13 dec. 2011, om 21:01 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: meta/recipes-devtools/python/python_2.7.2.bb:TARGET_CC_ARCH_append_armv6 = -D__SOFTFP__

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/7] perl: add .pl, pm, pod, sh files to SSTATE_SCANE_FILES

2011-12-15 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:50 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) This commit message is very terse. What is SSTATE_SCAN[E]_FILES and why do we want

[OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-xilinx: Update inc file path after oe-core change

2011-12-15 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt ste...@datenfreihafen.org --- recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot-xilinx_git.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot-xilinx_git.bb b/recipes-bsp/uboot/u-boot-xilinx_git.bb index 255f3b5..016a0bb 100644 ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/7] sstate: Add SSTATE_SCAN_FILES

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:50 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: This allows recipes to specify files that may be outside the normal set for inclusion when there are hardcoded paths that need to be fixmepathed to work correctly. Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] u-boot-xilinx: Update inc file path after oe-core change

2011-12-15 Thread Stefan Schmidt
Hello. As JaMa pointed out it missing a layer prefix. Sorry for that. The layer does not contain a README where to send patches so I figured sending it to Adrian and cc'ing oe-core would make sense. regards Stefan Schmidt ___ Openembedded-core

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 7/7] perl: add .pl, pm, pod, sh files to SSTATE_SCANE_FILES

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:26 +, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:50 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.14.2.bb |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) This commit message is

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] gtk-directfb: add bbclass gtk-directfb

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 20:18 +0800, Xiaofeng Yan wrote: From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com This file remind user to add gtk-directfb to DISTRO_FEATURES and remove x11 \ when building core-image-gtk-directfb. [YOCTO #1674] Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gcc-4.6: Let G++ relocate gxx-include-dir when using --sysroot option

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:49 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: Hi Khem, What's puzzling me is that reading through this patch, we already do what this patch is doing? Where is the difference which this

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 9/9] libatomic-ops: drop directory with documentation to remove QA warning

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 02:07 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: On 12/13/2011 11:48 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikovdbarysh...@gmail.com --- .../pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb

Re: [OE-core] [oe] Minutes: OE-TSC Meeting 22-Nov-2011

2011-12-15 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:38 -0800, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: next meeting scheduled 6-Dec-2011 Were there any minutes posted for this meeting? I don't recall having seen them. thanks p. ___ Openembedded-core mailing list

Re: [OE-core] [oe] Minutes: OE-TSC Meeting 22-Nov-2011

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 12:33 +, Phil Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 13:38 -0800, Jeff Osier-Mixon wrote: next meeting scheduled 6-Dec-2011 Were there any minutes posted for this meeting? I don't recall having seen them. The meeting on the 6th didn't happen as we all got confused

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] conf/machine/include/arm add extra MACHINEOVERRIDES like x86 does

2011-12-15 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 13 dec. 2011, om 21:01 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: meta/recipes-devtools/python/python_2.7.2.bb:TARGET_CC_ARCH_append_armv6 =

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Remove PRIORITY field set as optional as it is the default

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 01:13 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: The following changes since commit b9dfccc018f32a47fc045f35d5f53d7269d791ed: gdk-pixbuf: Ensure the binaries can be relocated (2011-12-13 18:00:18 +) are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/OSSystems/oe-core

[OE-core] [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe

2011-12-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as 'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade path for the dropbear-systemd package on meta-oe we need to bump epoch and to avoid messing it up this needs to go into OE-Core. Signed-off-by: Otavio

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe

2011-12-15 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:08 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as 'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade path for the dropbear-systemd package on meta-oe we need to bump epoch and to avoid messing it

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe

2011-12-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:11, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:08 +, Otavio Salvador wrote: There was a 'dropbear-systemd' binary package on meta-oe versioned as 'v1' and it has been merged on dropbear's bbappend; to fix the upgrade path for the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] dropbear: bump epoch to fix upgrade path in meta-oe

2011-12-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:14, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:11, Phil Blundell ph...@gnu.org wrote: If it's just a single output binary at issue then setting PKGE for that one package would be less disruptive. I must admit I don't fully understand

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/9] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task

2011-12-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dbarysh...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/15/2011 01:20 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 13 dec. 2011, om 16:19 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven: As per org.oe.dev and meta-oe's kernel.bbclass move uImage creation to separate

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/9] kernel.bbclass: compile kernel and modules in a single task

2011-12-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote: Op 14 dec. 2011, om 01:17 heeft Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov het volgende geschreven: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 12/13/2011 08:19 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/7] SSTATE_SCAN_FILES Fix with non-gplv3 and World fixes

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 17:50 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: Richard, This patch contains a couple of fixes for world and non-gplv3 along with the sstate fix for ensure we mangle (or fixmepath) files that do not fall into the standard set. SSTATE_SCAN_FILES is defaulted to *.la and *-configs,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/9] Move check that all installed files are shipped into insane.bbclass

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Checking that all installed files are shipped is in reality a QA check. It would benefit from mechanisms like ERROR_QA/WARNING_QA. So move it into insane.bbclass. If some of the files are installed but should not be shipped for

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/9] kernel.bbclass: compile kernel and modules in a single task

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: There is no point in compiling kernel modules in a separate task, run right after do_compile. On the other hand merging those tasks will e.g. make icecc used also for modules compilation, etc. Signed-off-by: Dmitry

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] consolekit: fix sdk generation issues

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Currently sdk generation might fail with the following error: | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to 'volatile/log': File exists. ERROR: Function 'do_populate_sdk' failed This

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH][RFC] conf/machine/include/arm add extra MACHINEOVERRIDES like x86 does

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 15 dec. 2011, om 14:06 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 13 dec. 2011, om 21:01 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:48 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] consolekit: fix sdk generation issues

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 15 dec. 2011, om 15:58 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Currently sdk generation might fail with the following error: | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkit-gtk svn: update to r101488

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
ping Op 30 nov. 2011, om 15:58 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende geschreven: tested on beagleboard/angstrom with midori and epiphany browsers Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net --- meta/recipes-sato/webkit/files/GNUmakefile.am | 37 ++-

[OE-core] [PATCH] update-rc.d.bbclass: override UPDATERCD for nativesdk

2011-12-15 Thread Bernhard Guillon
Override UPDATERCD for nativesdk. Without, update-rc.d is installed to /usr/sbin/update-rc.d with meta-toolchain if nativesdk recipe inherits update-rc.d. An example recipe for this is dbus. Signed-off-by: Bernhard Guillon bernhard.guil...@hale.at --- meta/classes/update-rc.d.bbclass |2 ++

[OE-core] meta-toolchain problem

2011-12-15 Thread Eric BĂ©nard
Hi, while building for 3 different arm platform (armv5, armv6 armv7), using oe-core + meta-oe + meta-angstrom I notice a problem when building meta-toolchain-qte or meta-toolchain : in the armv7a-toolchain, I find

Re: [OE-core] [oe] Minutes: OE-TSC Meeting 22-Nov-2011

2011-12-15 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 13:04 +, Richard Purdie wrote: The meeting on the 6th didn't happen as we all got confused about the meeting time changes. We did have a meeting on the 13th which I believe Jeff should have minutes for shortly. Ah right, fair enough. Thanks for the update. p.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] consolekit: fix sdk generation issues

2011-12-15 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-12-15: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Currently sdk generation might fail with the following error: | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create symlink from ./var/log to 'volatile/log': File exists. ERROR: Function

Re: [OE-core] SPDX vs LICENSE field valid licenses

2011-12-15 Thread Flanagan, Elizabeth
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bernhard Guillon bernhard.guil...@hale.at wrote: Hi all, I want to ask which license style is currently the preferred one? At license.bbclass this comment appears: # Standards are great! Everyone has their own. In an effort to standardize licensing # names,

[OE-core] [PATCH] sstate.bbclass: allow to disable sstate package creation

2011-12-15 Thread Martin Jansa
* building core-image-minimal-mtdutils with and without sstate packages enabled: with without real 98m 95m user212m 208m sys 26m 25m * but this was tested on fast machine with TMPDIR on fast raid0 array so the impact is not so bad on simple image,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] Clutter upgrades

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/13/2011 12:24 PM, Joshua Lock wrote: All, A fairly boring series. I've upgraded the clutter and cogl recipes to the recently released 1.8.2 versions. Further I've updated the SRCREV in the _git recipes to match the tagged releases and updated the distro tracking file to reflect these

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] initscripts: fix timestamp checking at bootmisc.sh

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/13/2011 10:27 PM, Lauri Hintsala wrote: Timestamp checking has been broken by the commit 2078af333d704fd894a2dedbc19cef5775cdadbb. Currently the RTC time is always overwritten with the time from /etc/timestmap. Fix timestamp checking and clean the code. Signed-off-by: Lauri

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] CentOS 5.x fixes

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/14/2011 09:31 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: A few fixes I made in the process of testing builds on CentOS 5.7. The following changes since commit b9dfccc018f32a47fc045f35d5f53d7269d791ed: gdk-pixbuf: Ensure the binaries can be relocated (2011-12-13 18:00:18 +) are available in the git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/9] kernel.bbclass: move uImage handling to separate task

2011-12-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Tom Rini tom.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] If no one minds the tiny bit of extra complexity, this was the approach that I was thinking about when reading this thread. I can

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/7] ed: Fix EXTRA_OECONF to ensure right compiler is found

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/15/2011 12:37 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 12/14/2011 10:56 PM, Khem Raj wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Saul Wolds...@linux.intel.com wrote: +EXTRA_OECONF = 'CC=${CC}' 'CXX=${CXX}' 'CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}' 'CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS}' 'CPPFLAGS=${CPPFLAGS}' 'LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS}' + hmm why

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] mkdosfs populated image creation fix version:2

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/14/2011 05:47 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: From: Nitin A Kamblenitin.a.kam...@intel.com This has enhanced the commit for fixing mkdosfs. We noticed some issues with the generated image with the earlier sent-out commit. This version 2 commit has improved the the mkdosfs further. Now

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkit-gtk svn: update to r101488

2011-12-15 Thread Saul Wold
On 12/15/2011 07:16 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: ping I think there was a pending question about why zlib was needed the answer was quite terse, do you have any more information, is it a needed missing dependency or ??? Thanks Sau! Op 30 nov. 2011, om 15:58 heeft Koen Kooi het volgende

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] webkit-gtk svn: update to r101488

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 15 dec. 2011, om 20:31 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: On 12/15/2011 07:16 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: ping I think there was a pending question about why zlib was needed the answer was quite terse, do you have any more information, is it a needed missing dependency or ???

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dosfstools: fix populated image creation with dirs

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
On 12/14/2011 05:47 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com This fixes bug: [YOCTO #1783] Fix populated image creation. Earlier subdirectories support was broken, and files can only be placed in the root directory. Now directory hirarchy is

[OE-core] opkg: Update svn 625 - 633 and fix preinst issues

2011-12-15 Thread Richard Purdie
There is a major issue with opkg images at the moment as preinst functions are not being executed before their dependencies are installed and this is leading to corruption of images containing avahi/dbus in particular. There are various changes in upstream opkg in the last 8 revisions which make

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dosfstools: fix populated image creation with dirs

2011-12-15 Thread Kamble, Nitin A
-Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:43 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Kamble, Nitin A Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dosfstools: fix populated image creation with dirs On

[OE-core] [PATCH 03/10] apt: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt.inc index 9d3268d..32e7d2d 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 04/10] dpkg: clarify LICENSE as GPL-2.0

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/dpkg.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/dpkg.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/dpkg/dpkg.inc index 2aecff5..d8f0fa5 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Additionally I'm not sure where the LGPL license came from, the COPYING file and Fedora both say GPL v2 or later so drop the LGPL entry for now. Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/udev/udev-new.inc |2 +- meta/recipes-core/udev/udev.inc |4 ++-- 2

[OE-core] [PATCH 01/10] gypsy: fix LICENSE field

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Gypsy binaries are Gpl-2.0 and the libraries LGPL-2.0 Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-connectivity/gypsy/gypsy.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-connectivity/gypsy/gypsy.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 00/10] Various license clarifications

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
A few metadata massages to ensure LICENSE fields specify the correct license version. The following changes since commit 0eb139619301d0efee330932eba3617dcb39284e: Patch Upstream Status Updates (2011-12-15 14:35:27 +) are available in the git repository at:

[OE-core] [PATCH 05/10] clutter: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/clutter.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/clutter.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/clutter.inc index 24cb30d..9e9c955 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 06/10] cogl: clarify LICENSE as LGPL-2.1 and fix metadata

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/cogl.inc |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/cogl.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/clutter/cogl.inc index 81317c6..beb2854 100644 ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 10/10] matchbox-session-sato: clarify LICENSE in GPL-2.0

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- .../matchbox-sato/matchbox-session-sato_0.1.bb |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-sato/matchbox-sato/matchbox-session-sato_0.1.bb

[OE-core] [PATCH 09/10] matchbox-desktop: clarify LICENSE is GPL-2.0+

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- .../matchbox-desktop/matchbox-desktop_0.9.1.bb |2 +- .../matchbox-desktop/matchbox-desktop_2.0.bb |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+

2011-12-15 Thread Joshua Lock
Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc b/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc index ff5a73a..922425c 100644 ---

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dosfstools: fix populated image creation with dirs

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
On 12/15/2011 02:03 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 12:43 PM To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Cc: Kamble, Nitin A Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dosfstools:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/9] consolekit: fix sdk generation issues

2011-12-15 Thread Cui, Dexuan
Koen Kooi wrote on 2011-12-15: Op 15 dec. 2011, om 15:58 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2011-12-13 at 20:19 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: Currently sdk generation might fail with the following error: | Collected errors: | * extract_archive: Cannot create

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Fix grub efi menu, kernel messages, and live image dosfsck

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
This series moves the live image EFI content to the /EFI/BOOT directory where it belongs per the specification. It also adds support for the efi_gop framebuffer. This allows grub to start on boot and the kernel to log messages to the physical console. Also correct some live image filesystem

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] grub-efi: Use /EFI/BOOT now that mkdosfs -d works with directories

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
[Yocto 1783] prevented us from using a proper /EFI/BOOT path in the live images due to a bug in the -d patch for mkdosfs in dosfstools. With this now fixed, we can place the efi payload where it belongs per spec and the images will autoboot to the grub menu on EFI platforms. Signed-off-by: Darren

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] grub-efi: specify prefix so it can find grub.cfg

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
Specify /EFI/BOOT as the grub prefix so the grub efi payload can find the grub.cfg in the same directory. Ultimately, it might make more sense to install the grub tools and the grub-core modules to sysroot and make the grub-efi bbclass generate the image in the required format as part of the

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] grub-efi: Add efi_gop module to payload for physical console support

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
Without the efi_gop module, the GRUB menu would work, but the Linux kernel messages would not be displayed to the physical console. Adding efi_gop causes grub to pass the proper information in the boot parameters pointer such that the Linux kernel can detect and use the EFI framebuffer.

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] bootimg: Use dosfsck to clean up the generated live image

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
The generated filesystem has some errors that dosfsck is able to repair: dosfsck 2.11, 12 Mar 2005, FAT32, LFN Checking file /ldlinux.sys (LDLINUX.SYS) Checking file /initrd (INITRD) Checking file /syslinux.cfg (SYSLINUX.CFG) Checking file /EFI (EFI) Checking file /vmlinuz (VMLINUZ) Checking file

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Drop dosfstools -d feature in favor of mtools mcopy

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
The dosfstools -d feature has been shown to be buggy, and even with Nitin's fixes applied to get directory hierarchies working, it still generates images that fail dosfsck and don't work with FAT32. This series presents an alternative means of populating our live images using mcopy from mtools.

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bootimg: Use mcopy to construct the hddimg

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
The initial directory support (-d) added to mkdosfs has proven to be incomplete and non-compliant with FAT. Rather than continue to maintain this feature and work around the various issues, we can use mcopy to construct the image. bootimg.bbclass already depends on mtools-native (although it may

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] dosfstools: Remove initial directory contents feature

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
By using mtools, we don't need to continue to maintain and workaround the issues generated by the -d feature included in the OE version of mkdosfstools. This reduces the number of out-of-tree patches we have to carry by 3 and eliminates a rather buggy chunk of code. Drop the initial patch adding

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Drop dosfstools -d feature in favor of mtools mcopy

2011-12-15 Thread Darren Hart
On 12/15/2011 10:14 PM, Darren Hart wrote: The dosfstools -d feature has been shown to be buggy, and even with Nitin's fixes applied to get directory hierarchies working, it still generates images that fail dosfsck and don't work with FAT32. This series presents an alternative means of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 08/10] pango: clarify LICENSE is LGPL-2.0+

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 16 dec. 2011, om 00:30 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven: Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/pango/pango.inc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] dosfstools: Remove initial directory contents feature

2011-12-15 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 16 dec. 2011, om 07:14 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: By using mtools, we don't need to continue to maintain and workaround the issues generated by the -d feature included in the OE version of mkdosfstools. This reduces the number of out-of-tree patches we have to carry by 3

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 02/10] udev: fix LICENSE fields to be SPDX compliant

2011-12-15 Thread Khem Raj
On Thursday, December 15, 2011, Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com wrote: Additionally I'm not sure where the LGPL license came from, the COPYING file and Fedora both say GPL v2 or later so drop the LGPL entry for now. Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock j...@linux.intel.com ---

[OE-core] after modifying source code in work/, how to rebuild package?

2011-12-15 Thread Leon Woestenberg
Hello all, after modifying source code in the work directory, what is the set of commands to rebuild the package (from the compile stage and further)? Under classic OpenEmbedded, I removed the compile, install, package stages stamp files and ran bitbake. However, shared staging broke that