Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: To avoid things like that in the future I have a few recommendations I'd like to get feedback on: In future can we please discuss

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com het volgende geschreven: Hi Koen, On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote: What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its netbase bbappend because it wasn't needed anymore. That's great,

[OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)

2013-05-16 Thread Jesse Zhang
Hi, We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone thinks before doing so, since the number of the modules are pretty large, and the policy may as well apply to python/ruby packages. Most of the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH [v1] 1/1] zlib: put shared libraries in base_libdir

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/16/2013 12:17 AM, Joe Slater wrote: We put the shared libraries in base_libdir because at least one library under base_libdir, pam_cracklib.so, needs them and will cause a qa warning when it is built. missing a Signed-off-by: and the [v1] seems to cause the subject to get parsed wrong.

[OE-core] systemd depends on util-linux

2013-05-16 Thread Erik Botö
Hi, I have stumbled upon a build error for systemd a few times, where it fails to build due to missing blkid/blkid.h. | src/udev/udev-builtin-blkid.c:30:25: fatal error: blkid/blkid.h: No such file or directory I think this happens when systemd is built before util-linux and can be fixed with

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:18:33PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:54:00PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Updated status, but only change IIRC is fixed php, tbb, android-audiosystem and partially fixed llvm2.9 (I'm testing patch to fix build on qemuarm again) qemuarm

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/4] dpkg: modify the run-postinst script to enable postinst logging

2013-05-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Enable postinst logging according to the existence of the file /etc/.enable_postinst_logging. In this way, the postinst logging is enabled if 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, and at the same time, we avoid unnecessary rebuilt if IMAGE_FEATURES is changed.

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/4] opkg: modify the run-postinst script to enable postinst logging

2013-05-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Enable postinst logging according to the existence of the file /etc/.enable_postinst_logging. In this way, the postinst logging is enabled if 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, and at the same time, we avoid unnecessary rebuilt if IMAGE_FEATURES is changed.

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Postinst logging reimplementation

2013-05-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Goal: 1. Enable postinst logging if 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES 2. Make rpm, opkg and dpkg not depend on IMAGE_FEATURES and POSTLOG Implementation: 1. The run-postinst scripts will log outputs and errors if /etc/.enable_postinst_logging is present. 2.

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] image.bbclass: add postinst_enable_logging

2013-05-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Add a function postinst_enable_logging, so that when 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, we create .enable_postinst_logging under /etc, which is used by run-postinst scripts to determine whether to log or not. [YOCTO #4262] Signed-off-by: Chen Qi

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/4] rpm-postinsts.bb: enable postinst logging

2013-05-16 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Enable postinst logging according to the existence of the file /etc/.enable_postinst_logging. In this way, the postinst logging is enabled if 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, and at the same time, we avoid unnecessary rebuild if IMAGE_FEATURES is changed.

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 mei 2013, om 16:44 heeft Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com het volgende geschreven: On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:36:02 Koen Kooi wrote: What triggered PR going backwards this time was a BSP removing its netbase bbappend

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: 2) *Never* use PRINC in type b) bbappends 3) Avoid PRINC in general Could we

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] Postinst logging reimplementation

2013-05-16 Thread Burton, Ross
On 16 May 2013 08:56, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: 1. The run-postinst scripts will log outputs and errors if /etc/.enable_postinst_logging is present. I'm not very keen on dot-files in etc, and as the postinst init script is one-shot shouldn't it be deleting that configuration file once it's

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: The flip side is that adding BSP layers becomes a lot safer. I don't mind adding layers. Adding layers is easy. For distros like Angstrom it is, yes, as I said above.

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Tomas Frydrych
Hi Phil, On 15/05/13 21:49, Phil Blundell wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 16:28 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: - we have a different (newer) version I think particularly for point updates we should be able to minimize the pain if the base recipes are set up well. - we use eglnative mostly,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] image.bbclass: add postinst_enable_logging

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:56:14PM +0800, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Add a function postinst_enable_logging, so that when 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, we create .enable_postinst_logging under /etc, which is used by run-postinst scripts to

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though. With PRINC gone would there be any other issue that would make

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:52:15AM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 05:18:33PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 12:54:00PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: Updated status, but only change IIRC is fixed php, tbb, android-audiosystem and partially fixed llvm2.9

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Tomas Frydrych
On 15/05/13 20:43, Richard Purdie wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 20:30 +0300, Richard Purdie wrote: How about the master branch gets renamed dylan so it clearly show what its meant to work against and follows the other repositories? Yes, that's on my TODO list, together with removing the couple

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Tomas Frydrych
On 15/05/13 19:24, Paul Eggleton wrote: However, I do think it's important for us to try to work together for the benefit of everyone, I entirely agree with this; I certainly don't want to maintain a public meta-clutter layer that competes with, or is perceived to compete with some other

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:37:23AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:23:35 Koen Kooi wrote: Op 15 mei 2013, om 22:33 heeft Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org het volgende geschreven: On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 09:36 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: 2) *Never* use

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Martin Jansa
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote: Removing layers is pretty much impossible, though.

Re: [OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)

2013-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 14:56 +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote: We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone thinks before doing so, since the number of the modules are pretty large, and the policy may as

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: replace package files

2013-05-16 Thread zhangxiao
And, another method lies on meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc: --- a/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc +++ b/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc @@ -69,11 +69,11 @@ FILES_util-linux-uuidd = ${sbindir}/uuidd FILES_util-linux-reset = ${base_bindir}/reset

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:01 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: The solution I came up with is to predefine a bunch common configure+depends+rdepends sets in the clutter/cogl includes (there is only a finite number of configurations that makes sense, though my recipes do not cover them all), and then

Re: [OE-core] [oe] State of bitbake world

2013-05-16 Thread Paul Barker
On 16 May 2013 08:52, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: meta-openembedded/meta-networking/recipes-support/ipsec-tools/ipsec-tools_0.7.2.bb, do_compile Picked this one up as it's relevant to what I'm doing with networking at the minute. It works for me so likely related to the

[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: replace package files

2013-05-16 Thread Zhang Xiao
Move libuuid.so, libmount.so and libblkid.so from util-linux's dev RPM package to related library's dev RPM packages. [YOCTO #4500] [CQID: WIND00412705] Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiao xiao.zh...@windriver.com --- .../util-linux-replace-package-files.patch | 56

[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: replace package files

2013-05-16 Thread Zhang Xiao
Move libuuid.so, libmount.so and libblkid.so from util-linux's dev RPM package to related library's dev RPM packages. [YOCTO #4500] [CQID: WIND00412705] Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiao xiao.zh...@windriver.com --- .../util-linux-replace-package-files.patch | 56

Re: [OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)

2013-05-16 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 14:56 +0800, Jesse Zhang wrote: We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone thinks before doing so, since the number of the modules are pretty large, and the policy may as

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Tomas Frydrych
On 16/05/13 11:35, Phil Blundell wrote: On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 10:01 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: The solution I came up with is to predefine a bunch common configure+depends+rdepends sets in the clutter/cogl includes (there is only a finite number of configurations that makes sense, though my

[OE-core] [PATCH] python-pygobject-native: fix build dependency on python-native

2013-05-16 Thread Cristian Iorga
Override needed for native package because of dependencies brought in by inheriting distutils-base.bbclass. Fixes [YOCTO #4502]. Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga cristian.io...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pygobject_2.27.91.bb |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [OE-core] State of bitbake world

2013-05-16 Thread Andreas Müller
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: FYI: these builds were started +- 3 days ago, because it takes +- 24hours for world build on one architecture (even with sstate-cache kept between builds, because it's quickly changing checksums with oe-core changes)

[OE-core] Problem with QTcreator and meta-toolchain-qte

2013-05-16 Thread Marco
Host development machine - Ubuntu 12.04 (native and into In WmWare virtual machine) OE/Yocto version - Yocto Dylan 1.4 (and master) Machine - imx53-qsb (and at91sam9263) After setting /opt/poky/1.4/environment-setup-arm.. I can successfully make the Qt/e app in console mode, but... 1.

Re: [OE-core] Problem with QTcreator and meta-toolchain-qte

2013-05-16 Thread Marco
Il 16/05/2013 15:32, Marco ha scritto: Host development machine - Ubuntu 12.04 (native and into In WmWare virtual machine) OE/Yocto version - Yocto Dylan 1.4 (and master) Machine - imx53-qsb (and at91sam9263) After setting /opt/poky/1.4/environment-setup-arm.. I can successfully make the

Re: [OE-core] proposal to move cogl, clutter and related recipes from oe-core to dedicated meta-clutter layer

2013-05-16 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 12:21 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote: This would probably merit some sort of cogl-initial recipe to add. Yeah. If it was just a case of doing that then I would have done so; the trouble is that you end up having to put garbage like # We need to use the nopango build of cogl

Re: [OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)

2013-05-16 Thread Joe MacDonald
[[OE-core] should perl modules go in oe-core? (possibly python and ruby ones too)] On 13.05.16 (Thu 14:56) Jesse Zhang wrote: Hi, We've accumulated quite a few perl modules and would like to contribute some/all of them to oe-core. But I think we'd better ask how everyone thinks before

Re: [OE-core] adding kernel headers to sysroot

2013-05-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 13-05-16 11:25 AM, Koen Martens wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I was asking this question on the irc channel earlier today, and bluelightning suggested I pose this question to this mailing list (with certain key people in cc). I have added a kernel header file

[OE-core] Issue with ti81xx-psp-linux-2.6.37 gcc-4.7

2013-05-16 Thread Grzegorz Sikorski
Hi, I was trying to update my AM3874-custom board OE (Angstrom) system to the new version, base on gcc-4.7 and got stuck on https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-May/001144.html. The thread is very old and still unresolved. Does anyone know if there exists workaround or

[OE-core] adding kernel headers to sysroot

2013-05-16 Thread Koen Martens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I was asking this question on the irc channel earlier today, and bluelightning suggested I pose this question to this mailing list (with certain key people in cc). I have added a kernel header file to the linux kernel for my project, that

Re: [OE-core] qt keyboard problem

2013-05-16 Thread Slater, Joseph
-Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core- boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Yi Qingliang Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:19 PM To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org oe-core layer Subject: [OE-core] qt

[OE-core] [PATCH] gtk+3: disable Xinerama support

2013-05-16 Thread Ross Burton
GTK+ has enabled by default support for Xinerama, but it's not a build dependency so this can be enabled or disabled depending if xinerama has been built previously. This can cause problems with sstate, and result in situations where PKG_CHECK_MODULES() for GTK+ can appear successful but the

[OE-core] [PATCH] libcroco: allow native builds

2013-05-16 Thread Ross Burton
Use BBCLASSEXTEND to get native builds, and inherit gnomebase instead of gnome. libcroco uses the class just for the SRC_URI helpers, and the full class was pulling in many unrequired dependencies including hicolor-icon-theme-native, which doesn't exist. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton

[OE-core] [PATCH v3 1/1] zlib: put shared libraries in base_libdir

2013-05-16 Thread Joe Slater
We put the shared libraries in base_libdir because at least one library under base_libdir, pam_cracklib.so, needs them and will cause a qa warning when it is built. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater jsla...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-core/zlib/zlib_1.2.7.bb | 15 +++ 1 files changed,

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] Fix mtab issue for initramfs install

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
This patch set reversn and older patch and correctly fixes the issue that /etc/mtab was getting installed in the initramfs because of a RDEPENDS on base files from rpm-postinsts. This RDEPENDS was wrong and now removed by this patch. The revert need to undo the remove of the cat /proc/mounts

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] rpm-postinst: remove un-needed RDEPENDS on base-files

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
This was transferred un-intentionally when we split the rpm code, the base-files then layed down additional files (specificaly /etc/mtab) in the initramfs image and caused problems for the installer code. Removing the RDEPENDS will fix the image generation issue and thus the installer, so we will

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/3] Revert initramfs-live-install*: fix the install boot option

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
This was not the correct fix for this issues, it turns out that base-files package was getting installed un-intentionally when rpm-postinsts was split out. The base-files recipe lays down the link that caused the cat failure. [YOCTO #4504] This reverts commit

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] initrdscripts: Not let PR go backwards after revert

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
Signed-off-by: Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com --- meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install-efi_1.0.bb | 2 +- meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-live-install_1.0.bb | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] image.bbclass: add postinst_enable_logging

2013-05-16 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/16/2013 10:56 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Add a function postinst_enable_logging, so that when 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, we create .enable_postinst_logging under /etc, which is used by run-postinst scripts to determine whether to log or

Re: [OE-core] [oe] [RFC] Layers, PRINC and bbappends

2013-05-16 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 11:29 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 10:59:54 Martin Jansa wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:29:48AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:31:33 Koen Kooi wrote:

[OE-core] Why doesn't my package rebuild

2013-05-16 Thread Gary Thomas
Sort of as a follow up to my problem of yesterday, I've run into a problem - I have a simple recipe which only unpacks a source tarball and then installs it - no other steps are listed or required. The recipe also does not have an explicit PR value and I'm not running a PR server. If I have the

[OE-core] [PATCH] qt: fix warning -Wunused-local-typedefs introduced by gcc 4.8

2013-05-16 Thread Andreas Müller
in meta-oe maliit-framework failed with | In file included from /home/andreas/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/sysroots/overo/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/QtCore:53:0, | from ../utils/core-utils.cpp:18: | /home/andreas/tmp/oe-core-eglibc/sysroots/overo/usr/include/qt4/QtCore/qtconcurrentfilter.h:

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto/3.8: set qemumips64 SRCREVs

2013-05-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
When qemumips64 was enabled, its machine specific SRCREV was missed. Without it, qemumips64 builds from the wrong branch and we miss important oprofile/ftrace fixes that are required for boot. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto/3.8: set qemumips64 SRCREVs

2013-05-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, The patch says it all: When qemumips64 was enabled, its machine specific SRCREV was missed. Without it, qemumips64 builds from the wrong branch and we miss important oprofile/ftrace fixes that are required for boot. This has been confirmed by everyone testing qemumips64

[OE-core] Redefine variable in bbappend

2013-05-16 Thread Yevhen Kyriukha
Hi! I'm using base-files recipe but I don't want that /var/log be a symlink to temp directory. Therefore in my custom layer I created base-files bbappend file with following content: PRINC := ${@int(PRINC) + 1} dirs755_append += ${localstatedir}/log volatiles = run lock tmp In this recipe I

Re: [OE-core] qt keyboard problem

2013-05-16 Thread Yi Qingliang
On Thursday, May 16, 2013 04:51:04 PM Slater, Joseph wrote: -Original Message- From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core- boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Yi Qingliang Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 11:19 PM To:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] image_types.bbclass: remove the obsolete images

2013-05-16 Thread Robert Yang
Ping. // Robert On 05/07/2013 06:26 PM, Robert Yang wrote: The following changes since commit 3472c1f7ab409cd91c1d4782d9e00880b84e3ae8: grub-efi-native: Cleanup whitespace (2013-05-03 16:37:05 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] image_types.bbclass: remove the obsolete images

2013-05-16 Thread Khem Raj
On May 16, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote: Ping. // Robert On 05/07/2013 06:26 PM, Robert Yang wrote: The following changes since commit 3472c1f7ab409cd91c1d4782d9e00880b84e3ae8: grub-efi-native: Cleanup whitespace (2013-05-03 16:37:05 +0100) are

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/4] image.bbclass: add postinst_enable_logging

2013-05-16 Thread ChenQi
On 05/17/2013 02:32 AM, Saul Wold wrote: On 05/16/2013 10:56 AM, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com Add a function postinst_enable_logging, so that when 'debug-tweaks' is in IMAGE_FEATURES, we create .enable_postinst_logging under /etc, which is used by

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] perl-tests: convert to ptest

2013-05-16 Thread Jesse Zhang
[YOCTO #4292] Replace PERL_TEST_DIR with PTEST_PATH, and rename tests with ptest in various places. Add a run-ptest script. Also add a patch to change the output format. Signed-off-by: Jesse Zhang sen.zh...@windriver.com --- .../perl/perl-5.14.3/ptest-format.patch| 69