Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/78] Review ACK

2013-07-29 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 26 jul. 2013, om 11:35 heeft Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com het volgende geschreven: On 26 July 2013 08:14, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: Emilia Ciobanu (12): babeltrace: fix recipe name build-appliance-image: fix recipe name add GIT revision to PV variable

Re: [OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 07/28/2013 11:34 PM, Iorga, Cristian wrote: Back from the past!! -Original Message- From: Iorga, Cristian Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 8:51 AM To: 'Saul Wold'; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer'; Burton, Ross Subject: RE: Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5 Hi Saul, Ross,

Re: [OE-core] Thoughts about bluez4 and bluez5

2013-07-29 Thread Iorga, Cristian
OK, thanks, will handle it this week. Regards, /Cristian -Original Message- From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:40 AM To: Iorga, Cristian; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' Cc: Burton, Ross Subject: Re: Thoughts about bluez4 and

[OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
This is necessary to get the build going, for instance with older Code Sourcery compilers. It is also disabled in upstream due to this very reason. The details can be found on the following links: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.busybox/30999

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Barker
On 29 July 2013 08:16, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: - busybox_cfg('wifi', distro_features, 'CONFIG_RFKILL', cnf, rem) - busybox_cfg('bluetooth', distro_features, 'CONFIG_RFKILL', cnf, rem) It would be good to have some way to re-enable this if it is needed. Maybe an 'rfkill'

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Let us fix the build issue first, and then you can improve the situation as you wish. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:20 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote: On 29 July 2013 08:16, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: - busybox_cfg('wifi', distro_features, 'CONFIG_RFKILL', cnf, rem) -

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg: Bump SRCREV as patch has been applied upstream

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Barker
The previous patch to fix the installation of libopkg headers has been accepted upstream and is the next commit after the SRCREV used by the opkg recipe. Therefore the patch can be replaced by a simple update of the SRCREV. Signed-off-by: Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] systemd: Remove init.d dir if systemd unit file is present and sysvinit not a distro feature

2013-07-29 Thread Shakeel, Muhammad
From: Muhammad Shakeel muhammad_shak...@mentor.com If systemd is supported DISTRO_FEATURE and sysvinit is not and also if systemd_unitdir contains anything then no need to keep init.d scripts for sysvinit compatibility. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Shakeel muhammad_shak...@mentor.com ---

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] busybox: Add syslog-init alternative only if SysV in enabled

2013-07-29 Thread Shakeel, Muhammad
From: Muhammad Shakeel muhammad_shak...@mentor.com If systemd is enabled then syslog is handled through a service file and related files in /etc/init.d are removed. This removes following warning: WARNING: busybox: NOT adding alternative provide /etc/init.d/syslog: /etc/init.d/syslog.busybox

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] ofono: Enable test scripts by default

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 07:51, Jukka Rissanen jukka.rissa...@linux.intel.com wrote: I think you should be using the ptest here instead of test and inherit ptest, please see the ptest.bbclass. I realize that this is not new code, but if we are going to changes this we should use the new ptest

[OE-core] [PATCH] bluez5: Only install .conf files if found

2013-07-29 Thread Jukka Rissanen
Bluez5 is migrating away from using separate .conf files for different profiles. So only install profile configuration files when they are found. This is needed so that the bluez5.inc file can be used with latest bluez5 from git. Signed-off-by: Jukka Rissanen jukka.rissa...@linux.intel.com ---

[OE-core] [dylan][PATCH 01/14] populate_sdk_base, adt_installer: abort install if path contains spaces

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
From: Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com Spaces are not handled properly in some parts of oe-core and it's safer to abort toolchain installation if path contains spaces. Even though we fix space handling in the toolchain installation script, there are various other parts in the toolchain

[OE-core] [dylan][PATCH 00/14] Backports for the OE-Core dylan branch

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
These are mostly backports from master with one patch for mesa which derives from part of a change in master. These have been tested on the Yocto Project autobuilder in conjunction with the two bitbake 1.18 patches I just sent. Note: I would normally not backport PACKAGECONFIG additions, however

Re: [OE-core] [dylan][PATCH 01/14] populate_sdk_base, adt_installer: abort install if path contains spaces

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
Hmm, this was meant to be sent as a cover letter only. Please ignore the 1/14 and treat it as if it was :) Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

[OE-core] [masterdylan][PATCH] lib/oe/terminal.py: add support for MATE desktop terminals

2013-07-29 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
From: Andre McCurdy andre.mccu...@entropic.com A simple clone of the corresponding Gnome class. Without this, devshell fails completely on a default installation of MATE desktop Linux Mint 15. Signed-off-by: Andre McCurdy andre.mccu...@entropic.com Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) 00/15] Tobe Reviewed and ACK'ed

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 28 July 2013 07:30, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: This is part 2 of the C-Pull, part one was reviewed and ACK'ed on Friday, these where some changes that have come in since, there are some additional changes that I still need to review (Read-Only Rootfs specificly). The contents of

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/3] ofono: Add systemd support

2013-07-29 Thread Muhammad Shakeel
On 07/26/2013 05:35 PM, Jukka Rissanen wrote: do_install_append() { - install -d ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ - install -m 0755 ${WORKDIR}/ofono ${D}${sysconfdir}/init.d/ofono +if ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES','sysvinit','true','false',d)}; then +install -d

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 08:16 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: This is necessary to get the build going, for instance with older Code Sourcery compilers. You seem to have inadvertently sent a patch to busybox.inc as well as the defconfig change that's described in the commit message. p.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
No, that was intentional. That is why the change has been updated. I can update the commit message if that is what you wish? On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 08:16 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: This is necessary to get the build going,

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix recipes' name

2013-07-29 Thread Emilia Ciobanu
The recipes have the local version of the packages appended to the recipe name. The following changes since commit 67864ca79da08df752487a3a4e1a975546da123d: systemd: Remove systemd_unitdir if systemd is not in distro features (2013-07-24 11:35:39 +0100) are available in the git repository

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native: fix recipe name

2013-07-29 Thread Emilia Ciobanu
Package recipe should contain version token in its name. Signed-off-by: Emilia Ciobanu emilia.maria.silvia.ciob...@intel.com --- ...ative.bb = docbook-sgml-dtd-3.1-native_3.1.bb} |0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native: fix recipe name

2013-07-29 Thread Emilia Ciobanu
Package recipe should contain version token in its name. Signed-off-by: Emilia Ciobanu emilia.maria.silvia.ciob...@intel.com --- ...ative.bb = docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-native_4.1.bb} |0 1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) rename

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:01 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: No, that was intentional. That is why the change has been updated. I can update the commit message if that is what you wish? As a general rule yes, please always make sure that the commit message describes what the patch is actually

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the history. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:01 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: No, that was intentional.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Not to mention, there is a huge difference between build time regression and run time, so I disagree. a)-c) can just as well be done after this change with the same loss. Do not blame me for introducing build (!) regressions, and then you have got a situation like this. If you feel it serious,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the history. If this was a recent change then I would have some (limited) amount of sympathy for your position.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Exactly, so you broke the update for the last two new versions on the *build* level. Anyway, if you do not have any sympathy for older users, then I am very disappointed. After this change, the image will build just fine for the new people. Also, if you do not write a change on top of mine, it

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:30 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: Not to mention, there is a huge difference between build time regression and run time, Quite so, run-time regressions are much harder to detect and debug. p. ___ Openembedded-core mailing

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
You *do* realize rfkill is a hardly common feature? Not to mention, you would cause a runtime issue which is pretty simple to fix for a very minor portion compared to a *large* user base using older toolchains. There is a huge difference between a few people cannot use rfkill for those

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 11:20, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: But in this particular case, your new patch seems to have more serious problems since it will cause rfkill to silently disappear for many people who do currently have it. If your distro selects a toolchain which doesn't contain the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
OK, I give up the contribution. I really cannot collaborate with people who think it is acceptable to break *many* users' life for the whole project without being able to use anything in favor of a very limited (!) people with only two (!) applications. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Burton,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 11:42, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: you would cause a runtime issue which is pretty simple to fix Enabling rfkill would involve writing a bbappend and patching busybox, when a PACKAGECONFIG would make everyone happy and configurable from the distro. Even if we disagree on

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Barker
On 29 July 2013 11:42, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Not to mention, you would cause a runtime issue which is pretty simple to fix for a very minor portion compared to a *large* user base using older toolchains. There is a huge difference between a few people cannot use rfkill for those

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Have you ever heard about project budgets and that updating a toolchain requires a lot of testing, and hence time, money, man power? On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote: On 29 July 2013 11:42, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Not to mention, you would

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Why it does not make sense in my opinion is the fact that the many people would already need to do this right now. Yet, you prefer a few people (if any?) with only a very limited application set out of the 1000+, as it is only two which is affected? I do not understand how the gun can be compared

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4942 On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Have you ever heard about project budgets and that updating a toolchain requires a lot of testing, and hence time, money, man power? On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:46 AM,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 29.07.2013 12:44, Laszlo Papp pisze: OK, I give up the contribution. I really cannot collaborate with people who think it is acceptable to break *many* users' life for the whole project without being able to use anything in favor of a very limited (!) people with only two (!)

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
closed minded is relative, and I have my personal opinion who could be classified like that. So let us not do ping-pong stop being closed minded games. :) As written several times already, it is just as simple action for the rare rfkill people to do enable this as for me? So, the *real* question

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 1) 00/64] Ready to pull (Acked on Friday)

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Sat, 2013-07-27 at 23:30 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: Richard, This is ready to pull, this is the set that was ACK'ed on friday by Paul and Ross, I removed the git recipe renames as requested and moved my obex change to a part 2. I did include a couple of priority patches from friday,

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) 00/15] Tobe Reviewed and ACK'ed

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:08 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: On 28 July 2013 07:30, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: This is part 2 of the C-Pull, part one was reviewed and ACK'ed on Friday, these where some changes that have come in since, there are some additional changes that I still need

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Only _one_, not two. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 11:22 +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote: I disagree. This change should not have gone in the first place causing the regression for the users. Please be consistent with the history.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
Oh, it is actually also in danny. I was looking into the files directory, but it is in the other. It is definitely not in denzil though. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Only _one_, not two. On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net

Re: [OE-core] sstate-cache and making a package host-dependent

2013-07-29 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 07/10/2013 07:45 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: Hi Mike, On Wednesday 10 July 2013 15:05:23 Mike Looijmans wrote: I added a buildserver that also exports its sstate-cache directory, so that other build machines can grab their stuff

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 29 July 2013 14:20:05 Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: Oh, it is actually also in danny. I was looking into the files directory, but it is in the other. It is definitely not in denzil though. Perhaps disable it only in the layer that pulls in these pre-2.6.31 kernel headers? Thanks,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Laszlo Papp
No, it should be disabled by default based on the fact most people do not need this rfkill what even upstream has been disabling, and it would be only enabled for those two utils out of the several thousand out there, anyhow. I am just repeating myself as the same is questioned again, again, and

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] systemd: Remove init.d dir if systemd unit file is present and sysvinit not a distro feature

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 15:34 +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: On 29 July 2013 09:09, Shakeel, Muhammad muhammad_shak...@mentor.com wrote: +# If systemd_unitdir contains anything, delete sysv_initddir +if (os.path.exists(systemd_unitdir) and os.listdir(systemd_unitdir)): +

[OE-core] [PATCH] v86d: mark as compatible with all x86, not just qemux86

2013-07-29 Thread Ross Burton
This package isn't specific to qemux86 but all x86 machines that are using the userspace VESA framebuffer kernel driver. Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-bsp/v86d/v86d_0.1.10.bb |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] [V2] systemd: Remove init.d dir if systemd unit file is present and sysvinit not a distro feature

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 15:36, Phil Blundell p...@pbcl.net wrote: Not sure we need the listdir(), why should the function only delete the directory if it has contents? If it doesn't have contents you'll be packaging an empty directory. The directory he's deleting is different to the one that he's

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set

2013-07-29 Thread Saul Wold
Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not show up in the summary below (in the first email). Already basicly ACK'ed by Ross and Paul Thanks Sau! The following changes since commit

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 08/10] irda-utils: make /etc/sysconfig writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:33 +0800, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com This diretory needs to be writable, the following error will appear at system start-up. /etc/rc5.d/S20irattach: /etc/sysconfig/irda: Read-only file system The whole chunk of code in that

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 16:07, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: Already basicly ACK'ed by Ross and Paul Just to double-confirm: Acked-By: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com ___ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH 1/6]qemuarm.conf: provide a common qemuarm machine configuration

2013-07-29 Thread Phil Blundell
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 12:02 +0800, Bian Naimeng wrote: qemux86.conf: provide a common qemux86 machine configuration, so developer/distributor can customize their specific one. Although, we can modify the meta/conf/machine/qemux86.conf to customize our configuration, but it's uncomfortable

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] busybox-1.21.1/defconfig: disable rfkill

2013-07-29 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 29 July 2013 15:34:29 Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote: No, it should be disabled by default based on the fact most people do not need this rfkill what even upstream has been disabling, and it would be only enabled for those two utils out of the several thousand out there, anyhow. It was

[OE-core] [PATCH] qemu: remove unused SDL variable

2013-07-29 Thread Ross Burton
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc |4 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc index 77045df..c43f1ef 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc +++

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 29 July 2013 08:07:51 Saul Wold wrote: Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not show up in the summary below (in the first email). Already basicly ACK'ed by Ross and Paul Thanks Sau! The

[OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/14] Fixed again

2013-07-29 Thread Saul Wold
Clearly having a bad morning! This one drops the Recipe Re-names from Ema, should not have been there. Sau! The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1: external-sourcery: add missing providers (2013-07-27 23:28:29 -0700) are available in the git repository

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 09/10] lighttpd: make /www diretory writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 03:33, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: +echo /www /var/volatile/www ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/readonly/lighttpd /www is the default lighttpd document root, where the web sites are stored, so putting them in a tmpfs would be very wrong indeed. Why does lightttp need write

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 10/10] openssh: make /etc/ssh directory writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 03:33, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com If the rootfs is read-only and the ssh keys are not available at system start-up, the init script will generate ssh keys into /etc/ssh, thus causing a 'read-only file system' error. Make this directory

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set

2013-07-29 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:49 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 29 July 2013 08:07:51 Saul Wold wrote: Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not show up in the summary below (in the first email). Already

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/26] Branch Updated with Correct Set

2013-07-29 Thread Saul Wold
On 07/29/2013 09:17 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 16:49 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 29 July 2013 08:07:51 Saul Wold wrote: Branch is updated, sorry not sure what happened with the obex and texinfo, I thought I had removed them since they did not show up in the

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/14] Fixed again

2013-07-29 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Monday 29 July 2013 08:51:01 Saul Wold wrote: Clearly having a bad morning! This one drops the Recipe Re-names from Ema, should not have been there. Sau! The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1: external-sourcery: add missing providers

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/14] Fixed again

2013-07-29 Thread Burton, Ross
On 29 July 2013 16:51, Saul Wold s...@linux.intel.com wrote: Clearly having a bad morning! Join me in the Need More Coffee Club... The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1: external-sourcery: add missing providers (2013-07-27 23:28:29 -0700) are

[OE-core] [PATCH] util-linux: Update for swapoff being a separate binary

2013-07-29 Thread Colin Walters
In older versions of util-linux, swapon and swapoff were the same binary, and it did runtime detection. But since v2.22 which is util-linux commit 6cf8d46ceefe9a7, they are separate binaries. This patch is necessary to make the util-linux version of swapoff work at all - currently in OE swapoff

[OE-core] OE Changelog since 2013-07-21 until 2013-07-28

2013-07-29 Thread cliff . brake
Changelog since 2013-07-21 until 2013-07-28. Projects included in this report: bitbake: git://git.openembedded.org/bitbake openembedded-core: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core meta-openembedded: git://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded meta-angstrom:

[OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Add support to EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES

2013-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
This allow the addition and removal of distro features easily. To add a feature, use: EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES += wayland and to remove, use '~' prefix, as: EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES += ~x11 This code has been mostly copied from Mentor Graphics public layer but changed the variable name for a more

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Add support to EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES

2013-07-29 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello Eric and Rogerio, On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: This allow the addition and removal of distro features easily. To add a feature, use: EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES += wayland and to remove, use '~' prefix, as: EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES += ~x11

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] base.bbclass: Add support to EXTRA_DISTRO_FEATURES

2013-07-29 Thread Rogerio Nunes
Thank you, Otavio! On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: Hello Eric and Rogerio, On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.br wrote: This allow the addition and removal of distro features easily. To add a feature, use:

Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL (Part 2) (resend) 00/14] Fixed again

2013-07-29 Thread Hongxu Jia
On 07/30/2013 12:32 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 29 July 2013 08:51:01 Saul Wold wrote: Clearly having a bad morning! This one drops the Recipe Re-names from Ema, should not have been there. Sau! The following changes since commit 09deeef20ee5a0c12ad4fd89cace6e0fb832d5b1:

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] buildtools-tarball: unset OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT

2013-07-29 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com The following changes since commit 67864ca79da08df752487a3a4e1a975546da123d: systemd: Remove systemd_unitdir if systemd is not in distro features (2013-07-24 11:35:39 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] buildtools-tarball: unset OECORE_NATIVE_SYSROOT

2013-07-29 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com When building a qemu image inside the environment created by the buildtools-tarball, the qemu image cannot be started, as the runqemu script uses the tunctl binary which cannot be found inside the sysroot directory of the buildtools-tarball. The

Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH 1/6]qemuarm.conf: provide a common qemuarm machine configuration

2013-07-29 Thread Bian Naimeng
said the following on 2013-7-29 23:36:, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 12:02 +0800, Bian Naimeng wrote: qemux86.conf: provide a common qemux86 machine configuration, so developer/distributor can customize their specific one. Although, we can modify the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] classes/sanity: check for suid root command evility

2013-07-29 Thread Mark Hatle
On 7/26/13 5:48 AM, Paul Eggleton wrote: Some users have been found to have an unnamed third-party piece of software installed which sets chmod, chown and mknod as suid root as part of its installation process. This interferes with the operation of pseudo and can result in files really being

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] opkg.inc: remove the obsolete REDIRECT_CMD

2013-07-29 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com The REDIRECT_CMD variable is now obsolete, remove it. Signed-off-by: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc |2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/opkg/opkg.inc

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] opkg.inc: remove the obsolete REDIRECT_CMD

2013-07-29 Thread Qi.Chen
From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com The following changes since commit bd1c441a210cae03fb6006c996227211cc29056b: bitbake: bitbake: runqueue: add warning if invalidating invalid task (2013-07-29 15:25:09 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 10/10] openssh: make /etc/ssh directory writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread ChenQi
On 07/29/2013 11:59 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 29 July 2013 03:33, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com If the rootfs is read-only and the ssh keys are not available at system start-up, the init script will generate ssh keys into /etc/ssh, thus causing a 'read-only

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 09/10] lighttpd: make /www diretory writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread ChenQi
On 07/29/2013 11:56 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 29 July 2013 03:33, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: +echo /www /var/volatile/www ${D}${sysconfdir}/default/readonly/lighttpd /www is the default lighttpd document root, where the web sites are stored, so putting them in a tmpfs would be very

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V2 08/10] irda-utils: make /etc/sysconfig writable in read-only rootfs

2013-07-29 Thread ChenQi
On 07/29/2013 11:26 PM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Mon, 2013-07-29 at 10:33 +0800, qi.c...@windriver.com wrote: From: Chen Qi qi.c...@windriver.com This diretory needs to be writable, the following error will appear at system start-up. /etc/rc5.d/S20irattach: /etc/sysconfig/irda: Read-only