Install zlib tests and run them as ptest
Signed-off-by: Tudor Florea tudor.flo...@enea.com
---
.../zlib/zlib-1.2.8/Makefile-runtests.patch| 38
meta/recipes-core/zlib/zlib-1.2.8/run-ptest|2 ++
meta/recipes-core/zlib/zlib_1.2.8.bb | 18
From: Roy Li rongqing...@windriver.com
no user uses these two patches
Signed-off-by: Roy Li rongqing...@windriver.com
---
meta/recipes-devtools/file/file/ge-le.patch| 72
.../file/file/stringb-compat.patch | 31 -
2 files changed, 103
On 27 November 2013 09:09, Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:49:19PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
How did you test this? The last time I checked, their implementation was
not able to
Explicitly set libdir in EXTRA_OECONF so that the correct library folder is
generated in a multilib build.
The version string (VER) has been changed to 8.6.1 and the library paths have
been updated accordingly so that the related tk recipe can correctly detect tcl
(this search is done using
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:09:04AM +, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 27 November 2013 09:09, Laurentiu Palcu laurentiu.pa...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 07:49:19PM +, Ross Burton wrote:
Drop sysroot patch as a rewritten form has been accepted upstream.
How did you test this?
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:55 +0800, Yue Tao wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yue Tao yue@windriver.com
---
.../bind-add-init-bind-status-command.patch| 45
meta/recipes-connectivity/bind/bind_9.8.1.bb |3 +-
2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:55 +0800, Yue Tao wrote:
From: Li Wang li.w...@windriver.com
avoid to handle special character '@' in filename and directory.
Signed-off-by: Li Wang li.w...@windriver.com
---
.../file/file/avoid_handle_special_character.patch | 36
On 27 November 2013 07:55, Yue Tao yue@windriver.com wrote:
avoid to handle special character '@' in filename and directory.
Please explain the problem more accurately. From looking I presume
the situation here is that the sed breaks when building file-native
and the build directory
On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:55 +0800, Yue Tao wrote:
+ else
+ if [ -f ${D}${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf ]; then
+ echo 'include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf'
${D}${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf
+ mkdir -p ${D}${sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d
+ fi
This will
On 13-11-27 08:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
The comment was originally written for module.bbclass and is now
slightly misleading. This updates it to match the current code.
Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
On 13-11-27 08:44 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
This reverts commit 6a6735cb98d529c8c5376aedb5c951339f54fe96.
The module class already ensures the scripts are rebuilt correctly. Running
this at sstate installation time is problematic since it can require the
cross compiler. Adding such a dependency
The comment was originally written for module.bbclass and is now
slightly misleading. This updates it to match the current code.
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
---
diff --git a/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass b/meta/classes/module-base.bbclass
index
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:55:41PM +0800, Yue Tao wrote:
From: Ming Liu ming@windriver.com
There are advantages in changing the contents of ld.so.conf to
include /etc/ld.so.conf.d/*.conf instead of directly listing directories
in it, just like most distributions are doing the same.
From: Zhangle Yang zhangle.y...@windriver.com
rpcbind restart executes stop and then start function. However, if
rpcbind is not started, exit 0 shall be run in stop function, so start
function will not be run at all. This patch changes exit 0 to return 0.
Signed-off-by: Zhangle Yang
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-11-27 08:44 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
This reverts commit 6a6735cb98d529c8c5376aedb5c951339f54fe96.
The module class already ensures the scripts are rebuilt correctly.
Running
this at sstate installation time is problematic since
On Wednesday, November 27, 2013, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 13-11-27 08:45 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
The comment was originally written for module.bbclass and is now
slightly misleading. This updates it to match the current code.
Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com
Looks
udev recipe defines udev_run=/var/run/udev in udev.conf, update udev
initramfs script to create /var/run directory before starting daemon.
---
meta/recipes-core/initrdscripts/initramfs-framework/udev | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
The purpose of oe-selftest is to run unittest modules added from
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest,
which are tests against bitbake tools.
Right now the script it's useful for simple tests like:
- bitbake --someoption, change some metadata, bitbake X, check something
type scenarios (PR service, error
From: Alexandru Palalau alexandrux.pala...@intel.com
Build images and tests different build options like RM_OLD_IMAGE
and for WARN_QA/ERROR_QA behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Palalau alexandrux.pala...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Stanacar stefanx.stana...@intel.com
---
From: Corneliu Stoicescu corneliux.stoice...@intel.com
Tests for bitbake-layers and expected output for some bitbake options.
Signed-off-by: Corneliu Stoicescu corneliux.stoice...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Stefan Stanacar stefanx.stana...@intel.com
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/bblayers.py | 37
Hello,
This series adds an oe-selftest script, some modules and a new layer
meta-selftest.
which are meant to help in writing tests (using python unittest) for various
bitbake tools/scripts as well as simple output checks or do
complete builds with different options (with the emphasis that
From: Corneliu Stoicescu corneliux.stoice...@intel.com
Everything in this layer is meant to be used by tests called by
scripts/oe-selftest. These are helper recipes/appends to test various bitbake
options or scripts.
Currently most of these files here only have include test_recipe.inc which
is
With the ABI safe recipes, we've been excluding those from signatures. This
is fine in the general case but in the specific case of image recipes it breaks.
A good test case is the interfaces file. Editing this causes init-ifupdown
to rebuild but not an image containing it (e.g.
The following changes since commit f991d2d60b74f5ebd990f77aecd3324b1a4533e9:
libpng: set reasonable SUMMARY (2013-11-27 11:51:08 +)
are available in the git repository at:
https://github.com/kergoth/oe-core.git random-fixes
https://github.com/kergoth/oe-core/tree/random-fixes
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Include the console-kit module in PACKSGES explicitly so bitbake can map to
the RDEPENDS we define for it in this recipe, and thereby ensure that when
adding the console-kit module to an image, we also get the necessary
consolekit package produced.
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
When using make -j with the 'install' target, it's possible for altbininstall
(which normally creates BINDIR) and libainstall (which doesn't, though it
installs python-config there) to race, resulting in a failure due to
attempting to install
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
It was currently autodetecting.
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-graphics/cairo/cairo.inc | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/cairo/cairo.inc
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
---
meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb b/meta/recipes-kernel/perf/perf.bb
index
From: Christopher Larson chris_lar...@mentor.com
Signed-off-by: Christopher Larson kerg...@gmail.com
---
...Handle-SOCK_CLOEXEC-NONBLOCK-if-unavailab.patch | 92 ++
meta/recipes-devtools/qemu/qemu.inc| 1 +
2 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
create mode
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Stefan Stanacar
stefanx.stana...@intel.com wrote:
This series adds an oe-selftest script, some modules and a new layer
meta-selftest.
which are meant to help in writing tests (using python unittest) for
various
bitbake tools/scripts as well as simple output
Would you mind summarizing the differences between this and the already
emitted image license manifest in deploy/license?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
The following change since commit 25a75e83550fab0f9d2486b13ec9ab6339b6a8b0:
Hi Chris,
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 12:02:41 Chris Larson wrote:
Would you mind summarizing the differences between this and the already
emitted image license manifest in deploy/license?
Actually I hadn't appreciated that there is a plain package list in that
directory now in addition to
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Wednesday 27 November 2013 12:02:41 Chris Larson wrote:
Would you mind summarizing the differences between this and the already
emitted image license manifest in deploy/license?
Actually I hadn't
33 matches
Mail list logo
