Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] python-native: export some environment variables

2014-03-24 Thread Chong Lu
ping On 02/25/2014 10:50 AM, Lu Chong wrote: On 02/24/2014 10:18 PM, Saul Wold wrote: On 02/22/2014 07:54 AM, Chong Lu wrote: Need to export these environment variables for python-config to work. Can you clariy further as to what's broken? Has this not been working in the past, or is this

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
The following changes since commit 49aad7da07e187f206e963001844605731b01247: bitbake: runqueue: Remove use of waitpid on worker processes (2014-03-19 17:46:33 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-libsoup

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
There was a error about mips-gcc optimization while building libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled, the 2.45.92 have fixed this issue. [YOCTO #5512] Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com --- .../libsoup/{libsoup-2.4_2.45.3.bb = libsoup-2.4_2.45.92.bb} | 4 ++--

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
On 03/24/2014 03:40 PM, Hongxu Jia wrote: There was a error about mips-gcc optimization while building libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled, the 2.45.92 have fixed this issue. Update the comments to make a clarity. libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92 There was an error about

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Burton, Ross
On 24 March 2014 07:40, Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com wrote: There was a error about mips-gcc optimization while building libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled, the 2.45.92 have fixed this issue. .92 means beta release in GNOME versioning, so not only is this a new upstream

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] acl: fix the order of expected output of getfacl

2014-03-24 Thread Chong Lu
The following changes since commit 24979a1f7ecc155cf36f61ffb2d2a32c2fb64734: busybox: disable fsck.minix and mkfs.minix (2014-03-23 09:08:54 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib chonglu/acl

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] acl: fix the order of expected output of getfacl

2014-03-24 Thread Chong Lu
The result of getfacl is sorted by user id. In Centos or RHEL, bin user id is 1 and daemon user id is 2. But in our image, bin user id is 2 and daemon user id is 1. The patch fixes this issue to make ptest pass. Signed-off-by: Chong Lu chong...@windriver.com --- meta/recipes-support/attr/acl.inc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
On 03/24/2014 04:09 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 24 March 2014 07:40, Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com wrote: There was a error about mips-gcc optimization while building libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled, the 2.45.92 have fixed this issue. .92 means beta release in GNOME

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: fix compiling failed while mips-gcc optimization enabled

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
There was an error about mips-gcc optimization while compiling libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled. The test code of libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 triggered gcc assert which located in gcc/dwarf2out.c:20810: ... 20806 gcc_assert (prev 20807(CALL_P (prev) 20808

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] libsoup-2.4: fix compiling failed while mips-gcc optimization enabled

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
The following changes since commit 49aad7da07e187f206e963001844605731b01247: bitbake: runqueue: Remove use of waitpid on worker processes (2014-03-19 17:46:33 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib hongxu/fix-libsoup

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Burton, Ross
On 24 March 2014 07:57, Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com wrote: There was an error about mips-gcc optimization while compiling libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled. The test code of libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 triggered gcc assert which located in gcc/dwarf2out.c:20810: ... 20806

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] util-linux: build setpriv requires libcap-ng

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
There might a failure when build util-linux with the meta-selinux layer: [snip] sys-utils/setpriv.c:21:20: fatal error: cap-ng.h: No such file or directory #include cap-ng.h ^ compilation terminated. [snip] Use PACKAGECONFIG to fix the problem. [YOCTO #6026] Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] util-linux: build setpriv requires libcap-ng

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
The following changes since commit 4a47c943a76e79af82d47d8fa83c6687e0d915a0: busybox: disable fsck.minix and mkfs.minix (2014-03-23 09:08:49 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/util-linux

[OE-core] Status Update

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
Executive Summary = A very rocky week but we now have consistent green builds on the autobuilder. 1.6 Release Status === Over the last week things have stabilised a lot from my perspective. Most of the major changes are now in or have at least been tested. In

[OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Steffen Sledz
We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two recipes. One for a shared library and one for an application using this library. Both use GNU autotools (so they have internal version information). For continuous integration purposes both use AUTOREV. At

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two recipes. One for a shared library and one for an application using this library. Both use GNU autotools (so they have internal version

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 24.03.2014 13:35, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two recipes. One for a shared library and one for an application using this library. Both use GNU autotools

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:49 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:35, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two recipes. One for a shared library and one for

[OE-core] Fetching from password-protected SVN repository

2014-03-24 Thread Mike Looijmans
I copied a recipe from an old openembedded classic project into an oe-core based one. It fetches from one of our many password-protected SVN repositories. This used to work just fine, all you had to do was just run 'svn something' on such a repo once and then svn would happily fetch from it.

[OE-core] [PATCH] glib-2.0-native: Fix DEPENDS

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
Address the error | checking for ZLIB... no | checking for inflate in -lz... no | configure: error: *** Working zlib library and headers not found *** by ensuring zlib-native is in DEPENDS. [YOCTO #5773] Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Steffen Sledz
On 24.03.2014 13:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:49 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:35, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two

[OE-core] [B6019] [ppc64] Fixes a typo in tune config file for e6500

2014-03-24 Thread Vali Cobelea
Please review the attached patch. Many thanks, Valentin From 0a6844b003402164359c121706957c6f81e5fe79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Cobelea valentin.cobe...@enea.com Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:36:43 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/1] [ppc64] Fixes a typo in tune config file for e6500. This

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 15:22 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:49 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:35, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: debian.bbclass (debian package

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:22:35PM +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:53, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:49 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: On 24.03.2014 13:35, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 13:16 +0100, Steffen Sledz wrote: We've a complex versioning

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] classes/staging: ensure do_populate_sysroot re-execs on changes to sysroot preprocessing funcs

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Eggleton
Without this dependency, changes to functions added to SYSROOT_PREPROCESS_FUNCS do not change do_populate_sysroot's signature and thus don't cause it to re-execute. Fixes [YOCTO #5852]. Signed-off-by: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com --- meta/classes/staging.bbclass | 2 ++ 1 file

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Fix for do_populate_sysroot signature issue

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Eggleton
The following changes since commit 4a47c943a76e79af82d47d8fa83c6687e0d915a0: busybox: disable fsck.minix and mkfs.minix (2014-03-23 09:08:49 +) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib paule/staging-fix

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] classes/binconfig: fix indentation in python function

2014-03-24 Thread Paul Eggleton
If we don't fix this, the recently added dependency from do_populate_sysroot on functions in SYSROOT_PREPROCESS_FUNCS in staging.bbclass triggers warnings that the get_binconfig_mangle function contains tabs for all recipes that inherit binconfig. Related to fix for [YOCTO #5852]. Signed-off-by:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] local.conf.sample.extended: update it for the archiver

2014-03-24 Thread Chris Larson
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.comwrote: +# 9) The recipe type that will be archived: +#COPYLEFT_RECIPE_TYPES = 'type1 type2 ...' +#The type can be: target native nativesdk cross crosssdk cross-canadian. Hmm, I wonder if we should note that the

[OE-core] [PATCH] staging: Save out provider information into the sysroot

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
This patch saves out provider information into the sysroot for all providers except those in MULTI_PROVIDER_WHITELIST. This means that we will start seeing warnings when two providers for the same thing are installed into the sysroot. In the future those warnings can be turned into errors.

[OE-core] [PATCH] Fix tar: .: file changed as we read it with cpio+tar builds enabled

2014-03-24 Thread Jonas Eriksson
Hi, This patch solves a problem we have been seeing when building both a .tar(.gz) and .cpio(.gz) image, where the cpio job creates a file in the rootfs directory. This event may happen while tar is running, which makes tar exit indicating an error and thus aborting the build. The only potential

[OE-core] [PATCH] cpio rootfs build: Avoid modifying rootfs dir

2014-03-24 Thread Jonas Eriksson
The Linux kernel requires that initrd images contain a /init file for the image to be used as an initrd, even if it is empty. Adding it into the rootfs directory creates a race, that can upset tar when building both a .tar and .cpio image file (tar: .: file changed as we read it). Additionally,

[OE-core] Features in Yocto Project 1.7

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we should be doing in the 1.7 cycle. I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at Developer Workflow. Its a generic topic which I think covered multiple areas (in no particular order): * the ADT/SDK and how it

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Features in Yocto Project 1.7

2014-03-24 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 16:09 +, Jonathan Austin wrote: On 24/03/14 16:00, Richard Purdie wrote: As development on 1.6 finishes up, its time to think about what we should be doing in the 1.7 cycle. I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at Developer Workflow.

Re: [OE-core] complex versioning scenario

2014-03-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Steffen Sledz sl...@dresearch-fe.de wrote: We've a complex versioning scenario here which leads me to my limits. :( There are two recipes. One for a shared library and one for an application using this library. Both use GNU autotools (so they have internal

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] toaster.bbclass: update buildstats event data

2014-03-24 Thread Alex DAMIAN
From: Alexandru DAMIAN alexandru.dam...@intel.com We add the PN to the buildstats event data in order to proper select database task when multiple similar tasks are executed for the same recipe file. Signed-off-by: Alexandru DAMIAN alexandru.dam...@intel.com diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Features in Yocto Project 1.7

2014-03-24 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
I can see this effort as a basis for re-writing the Models chapter of the development manual. Scott -Original Message- From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 9:01 AM To: openembedded-core;

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] wic: Add --rootfs option to --source param

2014-03-24 Thread Tom Zanussi
On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 23:25 -0300, João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas wrote: Hi Tom, I am working to enhance the patches with your comments. Em 21-03-2014 12:54, Tom Zanussi escreveu: In any case, I think the connection between a command-line param and the line in the .wks file should be

[OE-core] --conf Was: Features in Yocto Project 1.7

2014-03-24 Thread Trevor Woerner
On 03/24/14 12:00, Richard Purdie wrote: I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at Developer Workflow. Maybe I'm using things incorrectly :-) But I often find that I'm switching between building different images. For example, one moment I might be building

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] local.conf.sample.extended: update it for the archiver

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
On 03/24/2014 11:34 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.comwrote: +# 9) The recipe type that will be archived: +#COPYLEFT_RECIPE_TYPES = 'type1 type2 ...' +#The type can be: target native nativesdk cross crosssdk cross-canadian.

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] local.conf.sample.extended: update it for the archiver

2014-03-24 Thread Chris Larson
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.comwrote: On 03/24/2014 11:34 PM, Chris Larson wrote: On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.com wrote: +# 9) The recipe type that will be archived: +#COPYLEFT_RECIPE_TYPES = 'type1 type2

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] meta/conf/bitbake.conf: add STAMPCLEAN to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
The problem is that do_configure.sigdata depends on STAMPS_DIR because: do_configure - STAMPCLEAN - STAMPS_DIR this will make the sigdata generated by STAMPS_DIR=/tmp/stps bitbake -S recipe doesn't match the ones in our build dir, but it should. We can add STAMPS_DIR or STAMPCLEAN to

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] meta/conf/bitbake.conf: add STAMPCLEAN to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
The following changes since commit 09419cfb94b420628841bea8545e6a444856c3d5: local.conf.sample.extended: update it for the archiver (2014-03-25 09:47:08 +0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/stamps_clean

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] meta/conf/bitbake.conf: add STAMPCLEAN to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST

2014-03-24 Thread Chris Larson
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.comwrote: The problem is that do_configure.sigdata depends on STAMPS_DIR because: do_configure - STAMPCLEAN - STAMPS_DIR this will make the sigdata generated by STAMPS_DIR=/tmp/stps bitbake -S recipe doesn't match the ones

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/5] wic: Add --rootfs option to --source param

2014-03-24 Thread João Henrique Ferreira de Freitas
Hi Tom, Almost done. I need to test and check some use cases. Em 24-03-2014 17:13, Tom Zanussi escreveu: I suppose using --label would be ok, though I don't really like to overload things like this in general, and it forces the partitions to have labels. Nice, but I convinced myself to

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/1] base-files: do_install.sigdata: remove the depends on DATE

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
The following changes since commit 12217d8620e434a88433e7a60ff7fa8a1b51c6b1: meta/conf/bitbake.conf: add STAMPCLEAN to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST (2014-03-25 10:14:26 +0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/basefiles

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] base-files: do_install.sigdata: remove the depends on DATE

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
If we run bitbake -S base-files today, and re-run it tomorrow with nothing changed, we would see that the do_install.sigdata changes because of: do_intall - do_install_basefilesissue - DISTRO_VERSION - DATE We had set: IMAGE_NAME[vardepsexclude] += DATETIME in meta/conf/bitbake.conf, we can set

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] meta/conf/bitbake.conf: add STAMPCLEAN to BB_HASHBASE_WHITELIST

2014-03-24 Thread Robert Yang
On 03/25/2014 10:20 AM, Chris Larson wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Robert Yang liezhi.y...@windriver.comwrote: The problem is that do_configure.sigdata depends on STAMPS_DIR because: do_configure - STAMPCLEAN - STAMPS_DIR this will make the sigdata generated by

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] libsoup-2.4: upgrade to 2.45.92

2014-03-24 Thread Hongxu Jia
On 03/24/2014 05:06 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: On 24 March 2014 07:57, Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com wrote: There was an error about mips-gcc optimization while compiling libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 with DEBUG_OPTIMIZATION enabled. The test code of libsoup-2.4 2.45.3 triggered gcc assert which

Re: [OE-core] --conf Was: Features in Yocto Project 1.7

2014-03-24 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 08:11:20PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: On 03/24/14 12:00, Richard Purdie wrote: I think from my perspective, in 1.7 I'd like to see us looking at Developer Workflow. Maybe I'm using things incorrectly :-) But I often find that I'm switching between building