On 2018年11月09日 21:02, Burton, Ross wrote:
On Fri, 9 Nov 2018 at 01:39, Yu, Mingli wrote:
Why is this here and not in the manifest?
It's because we can optionally enable or disable tk via PACKAGECONFIG,
if add it to manifest then we need to always enable tk which is also the
implement in
On 2018/11/11 下午6:18, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
I am trying to catch the issue patches
I dropped all the rng pieces from -next and the current build is
looking a lot happier from a timeout perspective. It does seem to
mainly affect x86, particularly the x32 target for some
On 11/10/18 12:36 AM, akuster808 wrote:
On 11/1/18 11:07 PM, changqing...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Changqing Li
Signed-off-by: Changqing Li
---
.../recipes-support/curl/curl/CVE-2018-16839.patch | 35 ++
.../recipes-support/curl/curl/CVE-2018-16840.patch | 43
Hi Richard,
I realize the execution action inside
"build-appliance.build-appliance.Bitbake_build-appliance-image" was not
complete. Actually this particular test was testing that using
build-appliance-image and vmware, one can bitbake build-applianc-image. This
was different compare the
On 11/11/18 1:59 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:09 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
>> On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> The nightly-build-appliance target already tests this particular
>>> build.
>> If I am reading the AB code correctly, it is
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:09 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
> On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > The nightly-build-appliance target already tests this particular
> > build.
>
> If I am reading the AB code correctly, it is building for x86-64
> where
> as this is for x86. A QA person would
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 13:34 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
> On 11/11/18 1:18 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:52 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
> > > On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > Now the test markup of the development tools tests is complete,
> >
On 11/11/18 1:18 PM, richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:52 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
>> On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>>> Now the test markup of the development tools tests is complete,
>>> this
>>> can be further tweaked to auto run the correct tests.
On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 12:52 -0800, akuster808 wrote:
> On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > Now the test markup of the development tools tests is complete,
> > this
> > can be further tweaked to auto run the correct tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
> > ---
> >
On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> The nightly-build-appliance target already tests this particular build.
If I am reading the AB code correctly, it is building for x86-64 where
as this is for x86. A QA person would say they are not the same.
Are the resulting build results testing
On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Now the test markup of the development tools tests is complete, this
> can be further tweaked to auto run the correct tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie
> ---
> meta/classes/testimage.bbclass | 8
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4
On 11/9/18 6:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Now that the tests have correct markup to automatically determine which images
> they can run against, clean up the default test suites logic to be simpler
> and not image specific.
> Some cleanup of the compiler tests still needs to be completed but
On 11/9/18 7:36 PM, Niko Mauno wrote:
> On 11/9/18 2:24 AM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Nov 2018 at 10:58, Pascal Bach wrote:
>>> Busybox can provide ionice and rev. They are both installed to /bin
>>> The corresponding util-linux variant is installed to /usr/bin
>>>
>>> This causes the
Recently Debian-style support for link relocation was added to
'update-alternatives' script, but it fails under circumstances where
host rootfs root directory differs from target rootfs root directory
and two alternative packages provide a symbolic link with source
located in different
On Sat, 2018-11-10 at 10:22 +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> On 2018/11/10 上午9:14, Hongxu Jia wrote:
> >
> > > There are also other weird hangs being observed on the
> > > autobuilder
> > > after these changes. I can't prove its this patchset but I am
> > > suspicious and its something in master-next
15 matches
Mail list logo
