[OE-Core][PATCH] python3-importlib-metadata: Add toml dependency

ERROR: Do not try to fetch 'toml' for building. Please add its native recipe to DEPENDS. Signed-off-by: Changhyeok Bae --- .../recipes-devtools/python/python3-importlib-metadata_3.4.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:38 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > I am not looking at 5.4 since the issue is x86 specific and all x86 > BSPs on master are already on 5.10 perhaps we wont need to backport it > immediately Yah. And I just tried to port the patches,

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

I am not looking at 5.4 since the issue is x86 specific and all x86 BSPs on master are already on 5.10 perhaps we wont need to backport it immediately On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:29 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:26 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > ah I see your patch series,

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:26 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > ah I see your patch series, does this include above two patches ? It does yes. My local build worked, and since you confirmed they were good for the binutils fix, I cherry picked them on that basis. I did notice that they failed to

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 8/8] linux-yocto/5.10: binutils 2.36 fixues

Cool thanks for taking care of this. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:24 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > From: Bruce Ashfield > > Integrating the following commit(s) to linux-yocto/5.10: > > cdca78778415 objtool: Fix seg fault with Clang non-section symbols > d3287798bd88 x86/entry: Emit a symbol

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

ah I see your patch series, does this include above two patches ? On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:18 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi Bruce > > Yeah :) it was my local series and as mentioned temp hack. I think we > will wait for your SRCREV bumps for final fix. but perhaps this can > help to temporarily

[OE-core] [PATCH 7/8] linux-yocto/5.4: update to v5.4.94

From: Bruce Ashfield Updating linux-yocto/5.4 to the latest korg -stable release that comprises the following commits: 0fbca6ce4174 Linux 5.4.94 315cd8fc2ad2 fs: fix lazytime expiration handling in __writeback_single_inode() 5f8b8fccdfbc writeback: Drop I_DIRTY_TIME_EXPIRE

[OE-core] [PATCH 8/8] linux-yocto/5.10: binutils 2.36 fixues

From: Bruce Ashfield Integrating the following commit(s) to linux-yocto/5.10: cdca78778415 objtool: Fix seg fault with Clang non-section symbols d3287798bd88 x86/entry: Emit a symbol for register restoring thunk With these, build issues with binutils 2.36 are resolved Signed-off-by:

[OE-core] [PATCH 6/8] linux-yocto/5.10: update to v5.10.12

From: Bruce Ashfield Updating linux-yocto/5.10 to the latest korg -stable release that comprises the following commits: 05f6d2aa7e2f Linux 5.10.12 d5ac8304e180 printk: fix string termination for record_print_text() 861c2e349a36 printk: fix buffer overflow potential for print_text()

[OE-core] [PATCH 5/8] linux-yocto/5.10: update to v5.10.10

From: Bruce Ashfield Updating linux-yocto/5.10 to the latest korg -stable release that comprises the following commits: 8dc0fcbcfa97 Linux 5.10.10 3fe603666360 spi: cadence: cache reference clock rate during probe da02e4ca8a29 spi: fsl: Fix driver breakage when SPI_CS_HIGH is not

[OE-core] [PATCH 4/8] linux-yocto-rt/5.4: fix 5.4-stable caused build breakage

From: Bruce Ashfield 5.4-stable included a backport of: Author: Eric W. Biederman Date: Thu Dec 3 14:11:13 2020 -0600 rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible [ Upstream commit 31784cff7ee073b34d6eddabb95e3be2880a425c ] In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex

[OE-core] [PATCH 3/8] linux-yocto-rt/5.10: fix 5.10-rt build breakage

From: Bruce Ashfield 5.10-stable included a backport of: Author: Eric W. Biederman Date: Thu Dec 3 14:11:13 2020 -0600 rwsem: Implement down_read_interruptible [ Upstream commit 31784cff7ee073b34d6eddabb95e3be2880a425c ] In preparation for converting exec_update_mutex to a

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/8]: linux-yocto: consolidated pull request

From: Bruce Ashfield Richard, Here is the next round of -stable updates, some configuration tweaks, -rt bug fixes and the binutils patches identified by Khem. I didn't pick up any issues in my local build/boot testing. Cheers, Bruce The following changes since commit

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/8] linux-yocto/5.4: update to v5.4.90

From: Bruce Ashfield Updating linux-yocto/5.4 to the latest korg -stable release that comprises the following commits: ceed81a883dc Linux 5.4.90 6f484096196b regmap: debugfs: Fix a reversed if statement in regmap_debugfs_init() bbb2fee395e9 net: drop bogus skb with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/8] linux-yocto/5.10: update to v5.10.8

From: Bruce Ashfield Updating linux-yocto/5.10 to the latest korg -stable release that comprises the following commits: 7a1519a74f3d Linux 5.10.8 b77681d400f4 tools headers UAPI: Sync linux/fscrypt.h with the kernel sources 27c6968cfb76 drm/panfrost: Remove unused variables in

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

Hi Bruce Yeah :) it was my local series and as mentioned temp hack. I think we will wait for your SRCREV bumps for final fix. but perhaps this can help to temporarily testing master-next a bit. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:12 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > Richard, > > Obviously ignore this patch. >

Re: [OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

Richard, Obviously ignore this patch. It'll fail to apply as soon as my SRCREVs are bumped, and honestly, it's a hassle to have to wonder if this has been applied, have a failure, sent a revert, etc. I'm not even sure why it was sent. Bruce On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:36 PM Khem Raj wrote: > >

Re: [OE-core] [gatesgarth][PATCH 00/25] patch review request

On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 08:38 +, Lee, Chee Yang wrote: > Please consider this patch too, so the above patches works on openssl > > [PATCH 2/2] openssl: set CVE_VERSION_SUFFIX > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/147339?p=,,,20,0,0,0::Created,,openssl,20,2,0,80153216

[OE-core] [v2 3/5] glibc: Drop adding .file directive in asm files

it was a workaround for binutils issue which is fixed in 2.36 with https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26822 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...0026-inject-file-assembly-directives.patch | 244 -- meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc_2.33.bb | 1 - 2 files changed,

[OE-core] [v2 2/5] binutils: Disable parallel install for target/nativesdk binutils

2.36 has a build race between libctf and libbfd Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.36.bb | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.36.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils_2.36.bb index

[OE-core] [v2 5/5] linux-yocto-5.10: Backport couple of patches for binutils 2.36 upgrade

This is for master-next testing only !! Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...fault-with-Clang-non-section-symbols.patch | 150 ++ ...-symbol-for-register-restoring-thunk.patch | 125 +++ meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_5.10.bb | 5 + 3 files changed, 280

[OE-core] [v2 1/5] binutils: Package libdep linker plugins

this is new plugin added in binutils 2.36 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc index e93cd50b20..81891963c8 100644

[OE-core] [v2 4/5] musl: Drop adding .file directive in asm files

it was a workaround for binutils issue which is fixed in 2.36 with https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26822 Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- .../musl/0001-crt-Add-.file-directive.patch | 245 -- meta/recipes-core/musl/musl_git.bb| 1 - 2 files changed,

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] binutils: Upgrade to 2.36 release

Hi Bruce We need to backport another patch as well https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/44f6a7c0755d8dd453c70557e11687bb080a6f21 once we have these two patches kernel compiled fine with binutils 2.36 These backport requests need to go to Greg-KH as well. On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:46 PM

Re: [OE-core][PATCH] igt-gpu-tools: add procps-lib to RDEPENDS

On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 02:57 +, Mittal, Anuj wrote: > I see the same failure locally even when using the autobuilder > configuration so it's probably not related to multilib. > > I guess it's happening because procps was split up recently to have the > lib installed in a separate package and

[OE-core] [PATCH] opkg: Fix build reproducibility issue

A build date was leaking into the generated docs and makefile used for ptests leading to reproducibility issues each time the month changed. Add a patch to use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to derive it if available. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie --- .../opkg/opkg/sourcedateepoch.patch | 25

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] binutils: Upgrade to 2.36 release

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:39 PM Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:56 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Hi Richard and Bruce > > > > I also looked at the x86_64 kernel failure and it seems that objtool > > is crashing and we need to backport a kernel patch into 5.10 > > linux-yocto

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] binutils: Upgrade to 2.36 release

On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 1:56 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > Hi Richard and Bruce > > I also looked at the x86_64 kernel failure and it seems that objtool > is crashing and we need to backport a kernel patch into 5.10 > linux-yocto kernel > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/5] binutils: Upgrade to 2.36 release

Hi Richard and Bruce I also looked at the x86_64 kernel failure and it seems that objtool is crashing and we need to backport a kernel patch into 5.10 linux-yocto kernel https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/5e6dca82bcaa49348f9e5fcb48df4881f6d6c4ae Bruce, would you be able to take care of

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] libgcrypt: Whitelisted CVEs

Whitelisted below CVEs as their status is disputed and ignored and not affecting the Ubuntu and Debian environments. Hence, marked them whitelisted. 1. CVE-2018-12433 Link: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-12433 2. CVE-2018-12438 Link:

Re: [OE-core] oe-selftest for systemEmulated does not work.

Hi Richard, Thanks for the quick reply. After setting tap0 through "sudo /home/vinay/reference-poky/poky-master/scripts/runqemu-ifup 1000 1000 /extra/build-master-st/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/qemu-helper-native/1.0-r1/recipe-sysroot-native/usr/bin" and triggering oe-selftest for gcc is working.

[OE-core] Yocto Project Status WW05`21

Current Dev Position: YP 3.3 M3 development Next Deadline: 1st March 2021 YP 3.3 M3 build Next Team Meetings: * Bug Triage meeting Thursday Feb. 4th at 7:30am PDT (

Re: [OE-core] oe-selftest for systemEmulated does not work.

On Tue, 2021-02-02 at 18:18 +0530, Vinay Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Could not run oe-selftest for gcc using qemu image using below command, > $oe-selftest -r gcc.GccCrossSelfTestSystemEmulated.test_cross_gcc > > getting qemu boot errors as follows, > ERROR: Qemu pid didn't appear in 120 seconds

[OE-core] [meta][RFC PATCH] meta/classes/package.bbclass: Remove false positive lic warnings

Warnings occur if and only if licenses in the sources don't match LICENSE value of the recipe. Firstly, the recipe LICENSE strings are split into their individual license and the canonicalised to easy enable matching with licenses of sources. With the IGNOREWITHLINUXSYSCALLNOTE variable set to

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Let me tell you how I really feel. Zero filter. If you need meta-python2, you need to become a maintainer. Immediately. Period.

On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 15:40 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > can I get the write access to meta-python2 as mentioned above? > > I have 2 fixes to make it parse able with latest oe-core: > https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/89201 >

Re: [OE-core] [gatesgarth][PATCH 00/25] patch review request

>-Original Message- >From: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org c...@lists.openembedded.org> On Behalf Of Anuj Mittal >Sent: Tuesday, 2 February, 2021 1:34 PM >To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org >Subject: [OE-core] [gatesgarth][PATCH 00/25] patch review request > >Please