Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/2] oeqa: wic: Add tests for --no-fstab-update

Hi Alexandre, On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 18:34, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > Hello, > > On 10/08/2021 22:11:01+0200, Daniel Gomez wrote: > > Add tests for the --no-fstab-update wic part command. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez > > --- > > meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/wic.py | 56

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pypi: Allow override of PyPI archive name

On 8/12/21 6:03 PM, Tim Orling wrote: On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 5:58 PM Khem Raj > wrote: On 8/10/21 4:03 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > Some packages on PyPI don't follow the usual expectations for archive > naming. For example, the archive for

Re: [OE-core] ntpsec on OE/YP?

On 8/9/21 2:23 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: colleague asks about the state of ntpsec (https://www.ntpsec.org/) on OE/YP, a quick search does not show official support of any kind, any pointers? there is no recipe yet, someone need to write one, perhaps I will get to it someday rday

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pypi: Allow override of PyPI archive name

On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 5:58 PM Khem Raj wrote: > > > On 8/10/21 4:03 AM, Paul Barker wrote: > > Some packages on PyPI don't follow the usual expectations for archive > > naming. For example, the archive for asyncio-mqtt 0.10.0 is named > > asyncio_mqtt-0.10.0.tar.gz (with an underscore instead

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] pypi: Allow override of PyPI archive name

On 8/10/21 4:03 AM, Paul Barker wrote: Some packages on PyPI don't follow the usual expectations for archive naming. For example, the archive for asyncio-mqtt 0.10.0 is named asyncio_mqtt-0.10.0.tar.gz (with an underscore instead of the dash used in the package name). To handle these edge

[OE-core] [PATCH] package.bbclass: FILER* override syntax

pkgdata no longer includes FILERPROVIDES* nor FILERDEPENDS*. Fix with new override syntax. Also apply to FILERPROVIDESLIST and FILERDEPENDSLIST. Signed-off-by: Tim Orling --- meta/classes/package.bbclass | 24 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff

[oe-core][PATCH 1/1] terminal.bbclass: force bash for devshell

Since shell_trap_code in build.py sets /bin/sh as the interpreter we will die a silent death if our environment contains things like "export -f bodilyfunction" and /bin/sh is really /bin/dash. Fixes this for the case of devshell. Signed-off-by: Joe Slater --- meta/classes/terminal.bbclass | 5

[OE-core] [PATCH] perl: do_create_rdepends_inc override syntax

The do_create_rdepends_inc function is used to recreate the perl-rdepends.txt file. Update RDEPENDS_ to RDEPENDS: for the new override syntax. Signed-off-by: Tim Orling --- meta/recipes-devtools/perl/perl_5.34.0.bb | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[OE-core] [PATCH] oeqa/runtime/cases: make date.DateTest.test_date more reliable

The test uses the broken out time and can only handle about 59s of delay, use a UNIX timestamp to allow for up to a 300s delay. [YOCTO #14463] Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- meta/lib/oeqa/runtime/cases/date.py | 9 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

Your patch doesn't apply to dunfell head: Applying: lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks Using index info to reconstruct a base tree... error: patch failed: meta/recipes-extended/lighttpd/lighttpd/0001-Use-pkg-config-for-pcre-dependency-instead-of-config.patch:6 error:

[OE-core][PATCH] lib/packagedata: Fix for new overrides

Fix read_subpkgdata_dict to account for the new override operator being ":" instead of "_" Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt --- meta/lib/oe/packagedata.py | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/packagedata.py b/meta/lib/oe/packagedata.py index

[OE-core] [PATCH] buildhistory: Add output file listing package information

Currently, buildhistory does not produce a single file combining relevant information of installed packages. Produce an output file "installed-package-info.txt" listing a package's runtime name, buildtime name, its recipe, version, and size to avoid having to look up each package externally.

Re: [OE-core][PATCH v2 2/2] oeqa: wic: Add tests for --no-fstab-update

Hello, On 10/08/2021 22:11:01+0200, Daniel Gomez wrote: > Add tests for the --no-fstab-update wic part command. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez > --- > meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/wic.py | 56 + > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+) > > diff --git

Re: [OE-core] issues with wic creating "multi-partition" images?

On 12/08/2021 05:50:53-0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > p.s. as i read it, the only distinction between a "wks" and a "wks.in" > file is the need to pre-process variable substitution in the latter, > correct? It is my understanding, yes. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded

Re: [OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

Hi, Could you please check again. I have fixed the fuzz error. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154740): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154740 Mute This Topic:

[OE-core] [poky][dunfell][PATCH] lighttpd: Add patch for reuse large memory chunks

Added 0001-core-reuse-large-mem-chunks-fix-mem-usage-fixes-3033.patch to fix large memory usage for large file downloads from dynamic backends reuse or release large memory chunks. This issue is caused by a bug in the lighttpd 1.4.55 version and has been fixed in lighttpd 1.4.58. Hence, it is not

Re: [OE-core] issues with wic creating "multi-partition" images?

On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > Hello, > > On 12/08/2021 05:26:47-0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > asking from a position of massive ignorance since i just started > > digging into wic, but i've been reliably assured that i am going to > > encounter issues with trying to

Re: [OE-core] issues with wic creating "multi-partition" images?

Hello, On 12/08/2021 05:26:47-0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > asking from a position of massive ignorance since i just started > digging into wic, but i've been reliably assured that i am going to > encounter issues with trying to get wic to create what i choose to > call "multi-partition"

[OE-core] issues with wic creating "multi-partition" images?

asking from a position of massive ignorance since i just started digging into wic, but i've been reliably assured that i am going to encounter issues with trying to get wic to create what i choose to call "multi-partition" images, and i just want to know if this is an actual issue. current

Re: [OE-core] [pseudo][PATCH] fcntl: Add support for F_GETPIPE_SZ

On Wednesday 11 August 2021 at 22:38:23 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 16:58 +0100, Mike Crowe via lists.openembedded.org > wrote: > > When running the test suite on my Debian 11 box I see many occurrences > > of: > > > >  unknown fcntl argument 1032, assuming long