Re: [OE-core] FW: GCC patch "[PATCH] Share work directories" to be discussed after GCC upstream denial

2023-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2023-04-14 at 06:20 +, Shinde, Yash wrote: > As discussed in the meeting, sharing the GCC upstream’s reply for the > “Share work directories” patch. Thanks for sharing this. With a few of these patches we need to understand the history of them and why we're doing what we do. Since we

[OE-core] FW: GCC patch "[PATCH] Share work directories" to be discussed after GCC upstream denial

2023-04-13 Thread Shinde, Yash
As discussed in the meeting, sharing the GCC upstream’s reply for the “Share work directories” patch. Regards, Yash From: Andrew Pinski Sent: 22 February 2023 21:34 To: Shinde, Yash Cc: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org

[OE-core] FW: GCC patch "[PATCH] Share work directories" to be discussed after GCC upstream denial

2023-04-13 Thread Shinde, Yash
From: Shinde, Yash Sent: 14 April 2023 11:45 To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; yashinde...@gmail.com Subject: FW: GCC patch "[PATCH] Share work directories" to be

[OE-core] FW: GCC patch "[PATCH] Share work directories" to be discussed after GCC upstream denial

2023-04-13 Thread Shinde, Yash
As discussed in the meeting, sharing the GCC upstream’s reply for “Share work directories” patch. Regards, Yash From: Andrew Pinski Sent: 22 February 2023 21:34 To: Shinde, Yash Cc: gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org

Re: [OE-core] cargo patching git path

2023-04-13 Thread Frederic Martinsons
I opened a dedicated ticket ( https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15104) for this issue. On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 13:50, Frederic Martinsons via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > By the way, it was way simpler to update my cargo to 1.68.2 and I confirm > the patching still works like a

[OE-core] [PATCH] systemd: upgrade 253.1 -> 253.3

2023-04-13 Thread wangmy
From: Wang Mingyu Changelog: https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable/blob/v253.3/NEWS 0025-systemctl-explicitly-cast-the-constants-to-uint64_t.patch removed since it's included in 253.3 Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu --- ...md-boot_253.1.bb => systemd-boot_253.3.bb} | 0 meta/recipes-core/syst

[OE-core] [PATCH] report-error: make it catch ParseError error

2023-04-13 Thread Yu, Mingli
From: Mingli Yu Make the report-error catch ParseError error as below and then we can check it directly via error report web. ParseError at /build/layers/oe-core/meta/recipes-support/curl/curl_7.88.1.bb:32: unparsed line: 'PACKAGECONFIG[ares] = "--enable-ares,--disable-ares,c-ares,,,threaded-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
Thanks for your review and correct me. I should create a patch based on an openembedded-core repository rather than a poky repository. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#179983): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/mess

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 08:29 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 6:44 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 06:16 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:14 AM Richard Purdie > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:54 -0700, Khem Raj w

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Luca Ceresoli via lists.openembedded.org
Hello Jamin, thank you for your contribution! On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:31:08 +0800 "Jamin Lin" wrote: > The default value of address-cells is "1", so the generated "its" file > only supports 32bits address for kernel FIT image. > However, some platforms may want to support 64bits address > of UBO

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 6:44 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 06:16 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:14 AM Richard Purdie > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > > > --- > > > > ...0001-P

Re: [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] go: fix CVE-2022-41724, 41725

2023-04-13 Thread Joe Slater
> -Original Message- > From: Luca Ceresoli > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 1:39 PM > To: Slater, Joseph > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; MacLeod, Randy > > Subject: Re: [oe-core][PATCH 1/1] go: fix CVE-2022-41724, 41725 > > Hello Joe, > > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:32:06

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2023-04-13 at 06:16 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:14 AM Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > > --- > > > ...0001-Provide-fixes-for-tests-on-musl.patch | 73 +++ > > > met

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Alexander Kanavin
I tend to agree with RP, this needs to be discussed with upstream first. We should avoid patches which are both conditional and non-upstreamable. If gawk upstream doesn't want their tests to be compatible with musl, then maybe neither should we. Alex On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 15:17, Khem Raj wrote:

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:14 AM Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > ...0001-Provide-fixes-for-tests-on-musl.patch | 73 +++ > > meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_5.2.1.bb | 7 +- > > 2 files chan

Re: [OE-core] cargo patching git path

2023-04-13 Thread Frederic Martinsons
By the way, it was way simpler to update my cargo to 1.68.2 and I confirm the patching still works like a charm. On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 13:40, Frederic Martinsons via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > Hello, > > Since I didn't manage to make any progress on the reproducibility issue of > zvariant

[OE-core] cargo patching git path

2023-04-13 Thread Frederic Martinsons
Hello, Since I didn't manage to make any progress on the reproducibility issue of zvariant (https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15090) i decided to try another rust project to see their reproducibility state. I went with zbus (https://github.com/zeenix/zbus) which use zvariant (beca

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
v1: kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address. Jamin Lin (2): kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address uboot-sign: support 64bits address meta/classes-recipe/kernel-

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
The default value of address-cells is "1", so the generated "its" file only supports 32bits address for kernel FIT image. However, some platforms may want to support 64bits address of UBOOT_LOADADDRESS and UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT. Therefore, adds a variable to support both 64bits and 32bits address cells.

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
The default value of address-cells is "1", so the generated "its" file only support 32bits address for uboot FIT image. However, some platforms may want to support 64bits address of UBOOT_LOADADDRESS and UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT. Therefore, add variables to support both 64bits and 32bits address. By defau

[OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
The default value of address-cells is "1", so the generated "its" file only support 32bits address for uboot FIT image. However, some platforms may want to support 64bits address of UBOOT_LOADADDRESS and UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT. Therefore, add variables to support both 64bits and 32bits address. By defau

[OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
The default value of address-cells is "1", so the generated "its" file only supports 32bits address for kernel FIT image. However, some platforms may want to support 64bits address of UBOOT_LOADADDRESS and UBOOT_ENTRYPOINT. Therefore, adds a variable to support both 64bits and 32bits address cells.

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] kernel-fitimage/uboot-sign: support 64bits address

2023-04-13 Thread Jamin Lin
v1: kernel-fitimage.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address uboot-sign.bbclass: allow users to change address-cells to support 64bits address. Jamin Lin (2): kernel-fitimage: support 64 bits address uboot-sign: support 64bits address meta/classes-recipe/kernel-

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 2/2] gawk: Fix ptests on musl

2023-04-13 Thread Richard Purdie
On Wed, 2023-04-12 at 22:54 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > --- > ...0001-Provide-fixes-for-tests-on-musl.patch | 73 +++ > meta/recipes-extended/gawk/gawk_5.2.1.bb | 7 +- > 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 > meta/r

[OE-core][PATCH 5/5] python3-build: add missing run-time dependencies

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski python3-build has several run-time dependencies that are missing from the recipe. This makes it impossible to use the module in self-hosted images. Add missing RDEPENDS. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-build_0.10.0.bb | 11 +

[OE-core][PATCH 3/5] python3-manifest: add tomllib

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski Add the TOML parsing module from the standard library to the manifest. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- .../python/python3/python3-manifest.json| 17 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/py

[OE-core][PATCH 4/5] python3-manifest: add ensurepip

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski Add the pip bootstrapping module from the standard library to the manifest. This module is a run-time requirement of python3-build. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- .../python/python3/python3-manifest.json | 23 +++ 1 file changed, 23 insert

[OE-core][PATCH 0/5] python3: fix run-time availability of python3-build

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski python3-build cannot be used in self-hosted images due to missing run-time dependencies in several packages. This series adds required RDEPENDS to python3-packaging and python3-pyproject-hooks, extends the manifest to include standard tomllib and ensurepip package and fi

[OE-core][PATCH 1/5] python3-pyproject-hooks: add missing run-time dependencies

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski JSON module is required at run-time by pyproject-hooks. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyproject-hooks_1.0.0.bb | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyproject-hooks_1.0.

[OE-core][PATCH 2/5] python3-packaging: add missing run-time dependencies

2023-04-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski python3-profile is required by python3-packaging at run-time. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski --- meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-packaging_23.0.bb | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-packaging_23.0.bb b/me