On 19 May 2023, at 16:54, Markus Volk via lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
> I have tested this to work on raspberrypi4-64. Is this something that should
> be supported in oe-core or should it be added via bbappend?
That’s pretty ugly. :)
I’m not sure I’d want to carry a patch like that in core,
Finally there's a libwidevinecdm.so achievable for arm64. To make it
usable by chromium/kodi it is required to patch glibc:
From 85892fbc0d6f64f564f0d4c9514a7183ad8eb985 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: alex
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 12:16:20 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] HACK: Don't check
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 7:27 AM Alexandre Belloni via
lists.openembedded.org
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This doesn't build:
>
> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/103/builds/6024/steps/12/logs/stdio
>
> | make[1]: Entering directory
>
From: leimaohui
By default there is nothing in nghttp2-client and nghttp2-server ,nghttp2-client
and nghttp2-server aren't created. So there are dependences error if install
main package.
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides nghttp2-client >= 1.52.0 needed by
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:17 PM Armin Kuster wrote:
>
>
> On 5/9/23 6:32 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
> > From: Yoann Congal
> >
> > Exclude CVEs that are fixed in both current linux-yocto version
> > v5.10.175 and v5.15.108.
> >
> > To get the commit fixing a CVE, I used the Debian kernel-sec
From: Ross Burton
There's no need to use a sed to get the output we need, autotest can do
that itself if told.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/recipes-support/gdbm/files/run-ptest | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/gdbm/files/run-ptest
From: Ross Burton
---
.../libcheck/libcheck/automake-output.patch | 82 +++
.../libcheck/libcheck_0.15.2.bb | 2 +-
2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-support/libcheck/libcheck/automake-output.patch
diff --git
From: Ross Burton
libnl builds lots of test-* binaries but these are for manual testing
purposes. Instead, the test suite is entirely contained in the
check-all binary.
Clean up the compilation by simply building check-all, and install it
with libtool so the binary is installed correctly.
From: Ross Burton
This recipe depends on zlib so add that explicitly.
Disable the tests and remove the dependency on libcheck, as we don't
install them.
Remove obsolete PYTHON_DESIRED assignment that isn't used anywhere.
Explicitly disable the documentation for now.
Signed-off-by: Ross
Hello,
This doesn't build:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/103/builds/6024/steps/12/logs/stdio
| make[1]: Entering directory
'/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/genericx86-alt/build/build/tmp/work/core2-32-poky-linux/kbd/2.5.1-r0/build/tests/libtswrap'
| /bin/bash
Hello Michael,
I wanted to use a "CVE_STATUS_REASON", but it was advised here
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181037 by Richard. So
I was thinking, that it has to correct.
Regards,
Andrej
On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 15:09 +0200, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> Hi Andrej,
>
>
Thank you for this work. I think we are going in a good direction. My
comments in the text.
In general, I would like that we come with the fixed list of possible
statuses and avoid adding new ones too frequently. Changing them will break
my parsing and status scripts each time.
On Fri, May 19,
Hi Andrej,
On 19.05.23 at 10:18, Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
- Replace CVE_CHECK_IGNORE with CVE_STATUS + [CVE_STATUS_REASONING] to be
more flexible. CVE_STATUS should contain flag for each CVE with accepted
values "Ignored", "Not applicable" or "Patched". It allows to add
a
From: Thomas Roos
Devtool selftests require poky dir a git repo, when downloading poky as a tar,
this is not the case. Those tests will now skipped.
[YOCTO #12389]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Roos
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/devtool.py | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:56 PM Ross Burton wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 17 May 2023, at 17:32, Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure if you saw the old threads on this, but we went through this
> > binding in detail in february:
> >
> > See the series from TrevorW:
>
On Thu, 18 May 2023 at 17:52, Ross Burton wrote:
> > -PACKAGECONFIG ??= "readline ${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES',
> > 'debuginfod', d)}"
> > +PACKAGECONFIG ??= "readline ${@bb.utils.filter('DISTRO_FEATURES',
> > 'debuginfod', d)} python”
>
> This means that gdb hard-depends on python, can
Drop patches merged upstream.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
...01-drd-tests-Include-missing-cstdint.patch | 34 --
...efine-__THROW-if-not-already-defined.patch | 32 -
...inux-seg_override.c-add-missing-incl.patch | 30
This avoids pulling in the whole python stack if only
the main package is installed.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc
This is required by latest valgrind ptests.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin
---
meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/gdb/gdb-common.inc
index
From: Ross Burton
This is part of the same project as GitPython, but hasn't been used by
gitdb (the sole user) since 2014.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton
---
meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc | 1 -
meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-async.inc | 14 --
On 19 May 2023, at 01:55, Mittal, Anuj wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 12:09 +, Ross Burton wrote:
>> On 18 May 2023, at 03:31, Anuj Mittal via lists.openembedded.org
>> wrote:
>>> rename meta/recipes-core/glib-networking/{glib-networking_2.74.0.bb
>>> => glib-networking_2.76.0.bb} (95%)
Hi,
Looks good to me now. Thanks a lot!
Acked-by: Mikko Rapeli
Cheers,
-Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#181540):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181540
Mute This Topic:
- Try to add convert and apply statuses for old CVEs
- Drop some obsolete ignores, while they are not relevant for current
version
Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek
Reviewed-by: Peter Marko
---
.../distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc | 281 +++---
meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub2.inc
- After introducing the CVE_STATUS_REASONING flag variable, CVEs could
contain a reason for assigned statuses.
- Add an example conversion in logrotate recipe.
Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py | 20 ++-
- Replace CVE_CHECK_IGNORE with CVE_STATUS + [CVE_STATUS_REASONING] to be
more flexible. CVE_STATUS should contain flag for each CVE with accepted
values "Ignored", "Not applicable" or "Patched". It allows to add
a status for each CVEs.
- Optional CVE_STATUS_REASONING flag variable may contain a
Hi Andrej
On 19.05.23 at 08:24, Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org wrote:
- Replace CVE_CHECK_IGNORE with CVE_STATUS + [CVE_STATUS_REASONING] to be
more flexible. CVE_STATUS should contain flag for each CVE with accepted
values "Ignored", "Not applicable" or "Patched". It allows to add
a
Hello,
I have been facing some troubles while writing a very simple recipe
inheriting kernel.bbclass to build a mainline kernel.
The error message is:
... do_populate_lic: QA Issue: ... LIC_FILES_CHKSUM points to an invalid
file: .../work-shared/.../kernel-source/COPYING [license-checksum]
Hi,
Looks really good but could you split the documentation to separate
patch and send to d...@lists.yoctoproject.org instead of oe-core?
Thanks!
-Mikko
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:24:18AM +0200, Andrej Valek wrote:
> - Replace CVE_CHECK_IGNORE with CVE_STATUS + [CVE_STATUS_REASONING] to be
>
- Try to add convert and apply statuses for old CVEs
Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek
Reviewed-by: Peter Marko
---
.../distro/include/cve-extra-exclusions.inc | 281 +++---
meta/recipes-bsp/grub/grub2.inc | 9 +-
meta/recipes-connectivity/avahi/avahi_0.8.bb | 4 +-
- After introducing the CVE_STATUS_REASONING flag variable, CVEs could
contain a reason for assigned statuses.
- Add an example conversion in logrotate recipe.
Signed-off-by: Andrej Valek
---
meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/cve_check.py | 20 ++-
- Replace CVE_CHECK_IGNORE with CVE_STATUS + [CVE_STATUS_REASONING] to be
more flexible. CVE_STATUS should contain flag for each CVE with accepted
values "Ignored", "Not applicable" or "Patched". It allows to add
a status for each CVEs.
- Optional CVE_STATUS_REASONING flag variable may contain a
31 matches
Mail list logo
