Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk

2011-07-11 Thread Chris Elston
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 15:25 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 07/01/2011 02:20 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 10:06 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: + STATUS=${IMAGE_ROOTFS}/var/lib/opkg/status Please make that use ${opkglibdir} like the rest of the class does. Otherwise this patch

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] bitbake.conf: update OLDEST_KERNEL to 2.6.0

2011-07-08 Thread Chris Elston
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 09:38 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote: If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to 2.6.37 would be better IMO It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on top, and

Re: [OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-06 Thread Chris Elston
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 14:58 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 12:54 +0100, Chris Elston wrote: Since responses to my previous mail were generally positive, I've reworked the package feature switches so that the interface is as RP suggested. In the recipe for foo you

[OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-04 Thread Chris Elston
Since responses to my previous mail were generally positive, I've reworked the package feature switches so that the interface is as RP suggested. In the recipe for foo you would have a set of features defined like this: PACKAGE_CONFIG[bar] = --enable-bar, --disable-bar, libbar

Re: [OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-04 Thread Chris Elston
Hi, with my Angstrom cap on I like this syntax and I think it will be really useful. A second level concern I have is about conflicting features, its not something we will come across probably in DISTRO land as we are sensible enough not to select them. But users could select them in

Re: [OE-core] [PROPOSAL] Package feature switches, redux.

2011-07-04 Thread Chris Elston
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 17:44 +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote: On 07/04/2011 05:12 PM, Chris Elston wrote: Hi, with my Angstrom cap on I like this syntax and I think it will be really useful. A second level concern I have is about conflicting features, its not something we will come across

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Add support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk

2011-07-01 Thread Chris Elston
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 16:13 -0700, Saul Wold wrote: On 06/30/2011 04:10 AM, Chris Elston wrote: As discussed on IRC on 30/06/11, this patch adds support for BAD_RECOMMENDATIONS to rootfs_ipk, which is a list of packages NOT to install if suggested or recommended by a recipe. Taken from

Re: [OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-07-01 Thread Chris Elston
I'm proposing something along the lines of the following: This is actually along the lines of what I've been thinking too! Cool, I'm glad I'm not alone on this one :) How about something like the syntax for the recipe: PACKAGECONFIG[ogg] = --enable-ogg, --disable-ogg, libogg

[OE-core] Proposal: recipe feature switches

2011-06-30 Thread Chris Elston
We're looking to base an embedded development on oe-core in the near future, and one of the things we must have is the ability to configure features in/out of recipes per distro. At the moment some recipes have a configuration / set of dependencies baked in to the recipe. For example, gstreamer

[OE-core] [PATCH] Recipe for util-linux-2.19.1

2011-06-14 Thread Chris Elston
that to bb.utils.vercmp_string. Most of the patches for 2.17.2 apply unchanged, so renamed the directory meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux-2.17.2 to meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux so that they can be shared between package revisions. Signed-off-by: Chris Elston cels...@katalix.com --- meta

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] Recipe for util-linux-2.19.1

2011-06-14 Thread Chris Elston
Chris, Saul updated to 2.19.1 two weeks ago: http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core/commit/?id=596e6807826c34a4f93d7cb26052d1bd7a985201 It doesn't seem to have the vercmp change you mentioned, could you try to rebase your changes against that? Thanks for pointing me at