-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of Aníbal Limón
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:18 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/3]
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of Aníbal Limón
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 3:18 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCHv2 0/3]
-Original Message-
From: Zanussi, Tom
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 3:26 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; Wold, Saul; Burton, Ross; Ashfield,
Bruce (Wind River); dvh...@linux.intel.com; Openembedded-
c...@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE
On 10/3/14, 2:00 AM, Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun
rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com wrote:
lttng-modules breaks when building with kernel 3.10.43.
This updates lttng-modules for 2.4.2 and it will also
fixes the build failure with kernel 3.10.43.
Fixes for [YOCTO #6788]
Signed-off-by: Chang Rebecca
On 9/30/14, 2:00 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2014-09-30, 4:57 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
To build external modules, the link /lib/modules/kernel-version/build
must exist, and point to the proper kernel
On 9/25/14, 7:23 PM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
On 2014-09-25, 10:00 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
The lttng-modules recipe was failing for meta-intel BSPs with the v3.17
kernel.
These BSP kernels were enabling some
RP, Saul,
FYI, The fix for lttng-modules has gone upstream now. I have updated the
patch accordingly on the contrib branch.
Thanks,
Nitin
On 9/25/14, 7:00 PM, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
The lttng-modules recipe was failing
the YP 1.8
release.
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:47 AM
To: Hart, Darren; richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; Wold, Saul;
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] A tool for boottime image
Thanks for the feedback Ross, My comments below.
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:10 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Hart, Darren; Purdie, Richard; Wold, Saul; OE-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Hart, Darren; Purdie, Richard; Wold, Saul; OE-core
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] imageconfigurator: a new recipe for
boottime image
It will just be a matter of imageconfigurator RRECOMMENDing
imageconfigurator-data, and then imageconfigurator-data being
machinearch and doing the per-machine magic however it wants.
Ross
I see. That means the recipe will be split into two recipes. It would be cool,
if it can be done
I think this recipe is small enough so I don't think adding another one will
buy
anything...
Otavio, I agree with you here.
While on that, can you describe some use-cases you see which this can be
used to cover?
We have common BSPs in meta-intel such as intel-corei7-64 and
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:30 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Hart, Darren; Purdie, Richard; meta-in...@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v4 4/6] image-ucode.bbclass: a new bbclass for initramfs
Variable references can be used in overrides, provided the expansion
happens at the right time. However, it would not be appropriate to
use ${MACHINE} here because if it were used verbatim in the recipe,
it would not have the desired effect - the value of ${MACHINE} would
change with
On 4/11/2014 10:48 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 14-04-11 01:05 PM, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
From: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Use machine overrides for variables for this skeleton recipe so that
people following skeleton do it right at the beginning.
The machine overrides
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of Laurentiu Palcu
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2014 1:44 AM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] Revert
On 3/4/2014 1:38 PM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:28 -0800, nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
-(virtual/kernel in provides) and (target_os == linux-gnux32)):
+((virtual/kernel in provides) or (KERNEL_MODULE_RECIPE == 1)) and (target_os
== linux-gnux32)):
Can
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 8:00 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] mesa-gl: add GL-only Mesa recipe
On 14 September 2013 01:49, Kamble
these
for upstreaming.
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:09 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] mesa-gl: add GL-only Mesa recipe
On 11
[mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:52 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [RFC][PATCH] mesa-gl: add GL-only Mesa recipe
On 9 September 2013 17:57, Kamble, Nitin A nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
wrote
Hi Ross,
This is a clever way to deal with unnecessary rebuilding of mesa we were
seeing earlier. With this mesa-gl,
the mesa also need modification to remove gl from the default recipe.
Also looks like there is a need from community for mesa-gl-lib and
mesa-gl-headers, as some
platforms need
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of Otavio Salvador
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 3:14 PM
To: OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List
Cc: Evan Kotara; Lauren Post; Otavio
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:14 AM
To: 'Otavio Salvador'; OpenEmbedded Core Mailing List
Cc: Evan Kotara; Lauren Post; Daiane Angolini
Subject: RE: [OE-core] [PATCH v3] distro_features_check.bbclass: Allow
checking of required
-Original Message-
From: otavio.salva...@gmail.com [mailto:otavio.salva...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Otavio Salvador
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 2:57 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] gst-meta-base
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 3:37 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 3/3] gst-meta-base: bring in the v4l2 related
gst plugin
On Thu, Aug 08
, June 06, 2013 10:37 AM
To: Saul Wold
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Otavio Salvador; openembedded-
c...@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [CONSOLIDATED PULL 00/37] Post M1 Updates and
Fixes
Nitin, are we fixed with 9.0.2 for emgd? Will we need to carry that recipe in
meta-intel now
Saul, RP,
FYI, this fix is still pending for oecore layer.
Paul,
This is for the 1.4.1 bug
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4496 . Once Saul or RP pulls
it in master, you can pull it in 1.4.1 release branch.
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Eggleton, Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 9:15 AM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
Purdie, Richard; Wold, Saul
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] dropbear: a fix for hang
Acked-by: Nitin A Kamble nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
This patch is getting the linux-yocto-dev kernel building for the emgd based
meta-intel BSPs.
Without it the do_patch of the dev kernel fails as noted in the bug #3948.
Nitin
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 4:10 AM
To: Koen Kooi
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Kamble, Nitin A; Richard
Purdie
Subject: Re: [for-danny][PATCH] xf86-video-modesetting: new recipe for
gma500
Embrace the power of the scripting we have, there are much more
interesting ways to solve this problem generically. For example, I wrote this
piece of code in a few minutes (admittedly untested):
urlremapper.bbclass:
python () {
mod = False
newsrcuri = []
srcuri =
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:19 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto_3.4: use
${KSRC_linux_yocto_3_4_repo} based SRC_URI
On 01/16
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:37 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] linux-yocto_3.4: use
${KSRC_linux_yocto_3_4_repo} based SRC_URI
On 01/18
. And the commit log
does show the errors it was hitting, which are solved by using the native
version of the coreutils.
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Zhang [mailto:sen.zh...@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 6:09 PM
To: Richard Purdie; Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded
+++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-driver/xf86-video-modesetting_0.6.0.b
+++ b
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+require xorg-driver-video.inc
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
file://COPYING;md5=d8cbd99fff773f92e844948f74ef0df8
+
This seems to be wrong relative the actual version.
Yes, I missed to push that change
Ross,
I tried applying your patch from here with git am, and it is failing.
http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/39801/
Can you send me link to your contrib branch for the patch?
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 8:50 AM
I finally got the Ross's patch working in my env. I need to add one more patch
in meta-intel to get it fully working.
So I Ack for Ross's patch in oecore, and I will send a small patch for
meta-intel.
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Friday, November
-Original Message-
From: Zanussi, Tom
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 6:22 AM
To: Burton, Ross
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; meta-in...@yoctoproject.org; Openembedded-
c...@lists.openembedded.org; Hart, Darren
Subject: Re: [meta-intel patch 0/3] Fixes for rescent X breakages in meta
...@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 7:29 AM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: Zanussi, Tom; Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: [PATCH] xserver-xorg: restore packaging for the DRI/DRI2/DBE
extensions
Even though the current xserver in oe-core (1.13) doesn't ship
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 8:49 PM
To: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Wold, Saul; Zanussi, Tom; Kamble, Nitin A; andrea.ad...@gmail.com;
rpj...@crashcourse.ca; openembedded-core
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 9:10 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org; Wold, Saul; Zanussi, Tom;
andrea.ad...@gmail.com; rpj...@crashcourse.ca; openembedded-
c
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:41 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/19] automake update related commits on
master
On 07/10/2012 08:58 AM
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Purdie
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:48 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
Please ignore this evolution-data-server commit, as it is not complete yet.
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:43 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] eglibc: package mtrace separately
On 05/18/2012 02:07 AM, nitin.a.kam
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:33 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] eglibc: package mtrace separately
On 05/16/2012 09:11 PM
-Original Message-
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 4:36 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] eglibc: fix build with poky-tiny
distro
Hi Nitin,
On 05/09
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:02 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/40]
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 4:10 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 00/40] mostly automake 1.12 related fixes
On 05/04/2012 02:30 PM, nitin.a.kam
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 8:39 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/6] qt4: fix compilation issue
On 05/01/2012 03:00 PM, nitin.a.kam
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 2:52 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 8:36 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/2] eglibc: package mtrace separately
On 04/26/2012 03:53 PM, nitin.a.kam
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 1:21 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1]
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 4:43 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1
] grub 1.99: fix build for gcc 4.7
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of Khem Raj
Sent
Gary,
May be Matthew may be able to provide some help with his Freescale
background.
I could not add Matthew to the bug, so ccing him here.
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1570
Nitin
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 3:58 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 5:07 AM
To: Eric Bénard
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer;
Martin Jansa
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb with python
-Original Message-
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 9:37 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: eric; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; Martin Jansa
Subject: RE: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb with python
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
gdb-cross-canadian was linking with static version of libpython
and looking for build host python when run. This could be
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 6:15 AM
To: Khem Raj
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer;
Martin Jansa
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb with python
-Original Message-
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 9:38 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Eric Bénard; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer;
Martin Jansa
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:31 PM
To: Khem Raj
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer;
Martin Jansa
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb with python
Khem,
Can you help me understand why renaming readline.so to readline_d.so
is solving the core dump (or double free) issue?
As noted in another email, the host gdb on fedora is able working fine
without need of readline_d.so; so providing readline_d.so is also seems
to be a workaround over
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:02 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; martin.ja...@gmail.com;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:37 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; martin.ja...@gmail.com;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian
-Original Message-
From: Martin Jansa [mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:49 PM
To: Eric Bénard
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:03 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Martin Jansa; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:12 PM
To: 'Eric Bénard'
Cc: Martin Jansa; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb with
python support
Hi Nitin,
FWIW I took the i586 target sdk generated on the Fedora 16 and
put it on a VirtualBox VM running ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS x86_64 (2.6.32
kernel) and gdb still works fine.
Eric
Eric,
If it is working for you, I don't understand why is it not working here.
[nitin@nbuild0
-Original Message-
From: Eric Bénard [mailto:e...@eukrea.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:05 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Martin Jansa; openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org;
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build gdb
Looks like in my case the sdk gdb is not dynamically linked with
libpython.
And also sdk provides libpython.so so gdb should be linked with the sdk version
and not the host-distro version.
Thanks,
Nitin
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
And the config.log from the builddir is attached to this email.
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 3:55 PM
To: 'Eric Bénard'; Saul Wold
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; Martin Jansa
Subject: RE: [OE-core
Also executing sdk gdb on the same build system (suse) is giving the
same error.
do you have the possibility to launch a build on an other build system
?
Eric
Building on Fedora 15 (64bit) has given me same results. I am starting a build
on fedora 16 (64 bit).
Nitin
[nitin@nbuild0 oecore-x86_64]$
./sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/x86_64-oe-linux-gdb
*** glibc detected ***
./sysroots/x86_64-oesdk-linux/usr/bin/x86_64-oe-linux/x86_64-oe-linux-gdb:
double free or corruption (out): 0x7f3226818030 ***
Aborted (core dumped)
-Original Message-
From: Khem Raj [mailto:raj.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 9:25 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer; Martin Jansa; Eric
Bénard
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] Revert gdb-cross-canadian: build
gdb
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:50 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
McClintock Matthew-B29882
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 7:43 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Andreas Oberritter
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:00 PM
To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Purdie
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 1:31 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Martin Jansa
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:19 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
Lets ignore this commit then. As PV can not take the _ it does not help me
achieve what I wanted to. (Internal version tracking system).
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:03 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 2:14 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
] bdwgc: new recipe for autogen
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf
Of
Kamble, Nitin
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Koen Kooi
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:54 AM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 1:09 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:15 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 2/7] bdwgc: new recipe for autogen
On 01/18/2012 03:32 PM
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:16 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCHv3 3/7] libunistring: new recipe for
autogen
On 01/18/2012 03:32 PM
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 1:45 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 5/5] grub-efi-native: fix errors with
automake 1.11.2
On 01/17/2012 12
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Flanagan, Elizabeth
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:21 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core]
Khem,
Here was the configure error:
| configure: error: Package requirements (bdw-gc) were not met:
|
| No package 'bdw-gc' found
|
| Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
| installed software in a non-standard prefix.
|
| Alternatively, you may set the environment
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Kamble, Nitin A
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 5:29 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core
] eglibc: Upgrade recipes 2.14 - 2.15
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Kamble, Nitin A
nitin.a.kam...@intel.com wrote:
That is a big change for x32, It may work out or not, last time x32 +
eglibc-2.15 was causing some issues which were I think actually more
eglibc-2.15 issues. The worst case is I
-Original Message-
From: Saul Wold [mailto:s...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 11:10 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] eglibc: Upgrade recipes 2.14 - 2.15
On 01/05/2012 08:59 PM, Kamble
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 12:49 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH
Can this be done without removing eglibc 2.14 recipe files ?
X32 layer is depending on the eglibc-2.14 recipe.
Thanks,
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Khem Raj
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Martin Jansa
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 10:36 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer
Subject: Re: [OE-core]
: Kamble, Nitin A; Khem Raj
Subject: Internal compiler error
Hi Nitin/Khem/all,
We saw a failure on the Yocto Project autobuilder recently which
appears to be
the result of an internal compiler error [1] (note this is with the
edison
branch of Yocto, so it's somewhat older than what we have
Martin,
Thanks for the report.
Nitin
-Original Message-
From: openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org
[mailto:openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of
Martin Jansa
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:41 PM
To: Patches and discussions about the
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
