Hi Daniel and Petr,
> FWIW, we've build-tested it (against Sumo :(, changing the override
> separator), but have yet to execute the actual tests.
Thanks Daniel for creating the latest LTP builds for arm, arm64, i386
and x86_64.
LTP syscall tested on these architectures and no regression found.
1
On 13 June 2018 at 23:10, Saul Wold wrote:
> Can this be backported to both Rocko and Sumo?
This can be backported to both Rocko and not sure about Sumo
(I did not work on Sumo branch).
>
> Or is this a case to update LTP in those older releases?
Latest LTP + this fix patch (upstream accepted).
Adding cve-2017-5669 test fix patch which is accepted upstream in LTP repo.
Ref:
cve-2017-5669: shmat() for 0 (or https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/324
Upstream-Status: Accepted [https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/324]
CVE: cve-2017-5669
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju
Adding cve-2017-5669 test fix patch which is accepted upstream in LTP repo.
Ref:
cve-2017-5669: shmat() for 0 (or https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/324
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju
---
...69-shmat-for-0-or-PAGESIZE-with-RND-flag-.patch | 95 ++
meta/recipes
Adding cve-2017-5669 test fix patch which is accepted upstream in LTP repo.
Ref:
cve-2017-5669: shmat() for 0 (or https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/pull/324
Signed-off-by: Naresh Kamboju
---
...69-shmat-for-0-or-PAGESIZE-with-RND-flag-.patch | 96 ++
meta/recipes
