Make the license more accurate by specifying the specific variant of BSD
license instead of the generic one. This helps with SPDX license
attribution as "BSD" is not a valid SPDX license.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Watt <jpewhac...@gmail.com>
---
 meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.51.bb | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.51.bb 
b/meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.51.bb
index 3e653e371e..c9c30fb05f 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.51.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-support/libcap/libcap_2.51.bb
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ These allow giving various kinds of specific privileges to 
individual \
 users, without giving them full root permissions."
 HOMEPAGE = "http://sites.google.com/site/fullycapable/";
 # no specific GPL version required
-LICENSE = "BSD | GPLv2"
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause | GPLv2"
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://License;md5=e2370ba375efe9e1a095c26d37e483b8"
 
 DEPENDS = "hostperl-runtime-native gperf-native"
-- 
2.32.0

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#155585): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/155585
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/85302520/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to