Hello Andrej,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 14:07:41 +
"Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org"
wrote:
> OK,
>
> Now I know what's the problem. SPDX are being created without inheriting the
> cve-check class.
>
> Regards,
> Andrej
>
> On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 15:59 +0200, Valek Andrej wrote:
> >
OK,
Now I know what's the problem. SPDX are being created without inheriting the
cve-check class.
Regards,
Andrej
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 15:59 +0200, Valek Andrej wrote:
> Hello Luca,
>
> I wanted to check the logs, but it requires a login/password. Would it be
> possible to send a link where
Hello Luca,
I wanted to check the logs, but it requires a login/password. Would it be
possible to send a link where is not required? Maybe here
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/ ?
Regards,
Andrej
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 15:55 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Andrej,
>
> On Thu,
Hello Andrej,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 13:50:32 +
"Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org"
wrote:
> Hello Luca,
>
> How can I reproduce it? I've executed "bitbake qemu -c create_spdx" but it
> didn't print any warning. Should I build an image?
I don't know how to reproduce _exactly_ the build
Hello Luca,
How can I reproduce it? I've executed "bitbake qemu -c create_spdx" but it
didn't print any warning. Should I build an image?
Regards,
Andrej
On Thu, 2023-06-22 at 14:42 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hello Andrej,
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:59:02 +0200
> "Andrej Valek via
Hello Andrej,
On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 08:59:02 +0200
"Andrej Valek via lists.openembedded.org"
wrote:
> After discussion in all parallel threads we proposed following variant which
> covers both expressed requirements to have very small number of different cve
> statuses and also very large number
After discussion in all parallel threads we proposed following variant which
covers both expressed requirements to have very small number of different cve
statuses and also very large number of them at the same time.
This is a compromise version which maybe is not ideal but deals with
conflicting
