If the user accidently tries building u-boot on a machine doesn't use u-boot
(such as qemuarm) the error message doesn't make it clear why u-boot was
skipped. To help, state the machine that was being built for again.
[ YOCTO #4945 ]
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com
---
Speaking of gerrit terms: I would prefer that you didn't submit this.
I would like it to be more specific. If it cannot be more specific, it
should provide further information to get more specific information. Note,
machine configuration can be the command line as well, so this would still
be
On 1 August 2013 11:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Speaking of gerrit terms: I would prefer that you didn't submit this.
I would like it to be more specific. If it cannot be more specific, it
should provide further information to get more specific information. Note,
machine
On 1 August 2013 11:56, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 1 August 2013 11:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Speaking of gerrit terms: I would prefer that you didn't submit this.
I would like it to be more specific. If it cannot be more specific, it
should provide further
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 1 August 2013 11:50, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
Speaking of gerrit terms: I would prefer that you didn't submit this.
I would like it to be more specific. If it cannot be more specific, it
should provide
On 1 August 2013 12:18, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
It cannot be more specific without dumping the entire machine
configuration, which won't help because a variable is *not* set.
No no, it could print out the concrete file to look up, not just a name.
Besides, I would probably even print
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 1 August 2013 12:18, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
It cannot be more specific without dumping the entire machine
configuration, which won't help because a variable is *not* set.
No no, it could print out the
On 1 August 2013 17:33, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you meant here. Do you mean a situation where the
local.conf says MACHINE=foo and the user also sets MACHINE=foo in the
environment?
Yes.
But there's nothing wrong with the user doing that at all.
Ross
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 1 August 2013 17:33, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you meant here. Do you mean a situation where the
local.conf says MACHINE=foo and the user also sets MACHINE=foo in the
environment?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 1 August 2013 17:33, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
I'm not sure what you meant here. Do you mean a situation where the
local.conf says
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com
wrote:
On 1 August 2013 17:33, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
I'm not sure
On Thursday 01 August 2013 17:52:13 Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Otavio Salvador
ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com
wrote:
On 1 August
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
I'm afraid this is not practical. The ability to specify the value for
MACHINE
and other variables from the external environment is not just there for
folks
running bitbake manually from the command line, but
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
I'm afraid this is not practical. The ability to specify the value for
MACHINE
and other variables from the external environment is not just
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Otavio Salvador ota...@ossystems.com.brwrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Laszlo Papp lp...@kde.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Paul Eggleton
paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote:
I'm afraid this is not practical. The ability to specify the
15 matches
Mail list logo
