Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:40 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Thanks for hunting this bug, this was very annoying and hard to >> figure. It does seem to address the issue in our builder. > > Sadly, whilst

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

Hello Richard, Thanks for hunting this bug, this was very annoying and hard to figure. It does seem to address the issue in our builder. On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > If gdkpixbuf-native rebuilds and there are stale (broken) modules

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 16:54 -0600, Gary Thomas wrote: > On 2015-09-23 16:32, Richard Purdie wrote: > > If gdkpixbuf-native rebuilds and there are stale (broken) modules lying > > around, > > it can fail to run the postinst. E.g. svg links to harfbuzz and if harfbuzz > > is > > removed from the

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 08:27 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Thanks for hunting this bug, this was very annoying and hard to > figure. It does seem to address the issue in our builder. Sadly, whilst I merged it and it does fix that problem, I suspect this causes:

[OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

If gdkpixbuf-native rebuilds and there are stale (broken) modules lying around, it can fail to run the postinst. E.g. svg links to harfbuzz and if harfbuzz is removed from the sysroot but the svg loader isn't, we get a symbol linking issue. The reproducer is along the lines of build

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] gdk-pixbuf: Avoid rebuild failures

On 2015-09-23 16:32, Richard Purdie wrote: If gdkpixbuf-native rebuilds and there are stale (broken) modules lying around, it can fail to run the postinst. E.g. svg links to harfbuzz and if harfbuzz is removed from the sysroot but the svg loader isn't, we get a symbol linking issue. The