On 28 May 2015 at 11:13, Florian Boor
wrote:
> > ok great... then I'll change it to dropping the dependency of the -dev
> package
> > while I'm working on it anyway.
>
> hrm strange... somehow my new patch did not make it to the list. Anyone an
> idea
> if it ended up in some filter?
>
You mean
Hi,
On 20.05.2015 15:48, Florian Boor wrote:
> ok great... then I'll change it to dropping the dependency of the -dev package
> while I'm working on it anyway.
hrm strange... somehow my new patch did not make it to the list. Anyone an idea
if it ended up in some filter?
Greetings
Florian
--
T
Hi,
On 20.05.2015 15:32, Burton, Ross wrote:
> If you care about upgrade paths then the PR service is far more reliable than
> explicit PR bumps.
ok great... then I'll change it to dropping the dependency of the -dev package
while I'm working on it anyway.
Greetings
Florian
--
The dream of ye
On 20 May 2015 at 14:27, Florian Boor
wrote:
> > No. You should rely on PR Service for this. Drop the PR bump as it is
> > pointless here.
>
> oh PR Service - if we can rely on it in this case I agree.
If you care about upgrade paths then the PR service is far more reliable
than explicit PR bum
Hi Otavio,
On 20.05.2015 15:20, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> No. You should rely on PR Service for this. Drop the PR bump as it is
> pointless here.
oh PR Service - if we can rely on it in this case I agree.
Greetings
Florian
--
The dream of yesterday Florian Boor
is the hope o
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Florian Boor
wrote:
> On 20.05.2015 15:08, Burton, Ross wrote:
>> No need to bump PR.
>>
>> Personally I think that the fix here is to stop PN-dev depending on PN,
>> instead
>> of creating an empty PN package to confuse people.
>
> well, in this way it automatic
Hi Ross,
On 20.05.2015 15:08, Burton, Ross wrote:
> No need to bump PR.
>
> Personally I think that the fix here is to stop PN-dev depending on PN,
> instead
> of creating an empty PN package to confuse people.
well, in this way it automatically fixes this issues with the -dev package which
is
On 20 May 2015 at 12:49, Florian Boor
wrote:
> -PR = "r3"
> +PR = "r4"
>
No need to bump PR.
Personally I think that the fix here is to stop PN-dev depending on PN,
instead of creating an empty PN package to confuse people.
Ross
--
___
Openembedded-
---
meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb
b/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-engines/gtk-engines_2.20.2.bb
index 33b6afe..9c52193 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-gnome/gtk-en
