So to further update on this, I think with the fixes I've merged,
OE-Core should be clean for all the QA tests except desktop file
warnings and ldflags.
ldflags was a problem as the code wasn't triggering at all in Yocto due
to a bug in bitbake to do with the way ??= vs ?= was being handled.
On Friday 01 July 2011 18:12:47 Richard Purdie wrote:
Any volunteers for qt4-x11-free-4.7.3?
I'll take a look at it.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Openembedded-core mailing list
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 17:49 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
It's a white list, so:
# 0 - non dev contains .so
# 5 - .la contains installed=yes or reference to the workdir
# 7 - the desktop file is not valid
# 8 - .la contains reference to the workdir
# 9 - LDFLAGS ignored
Are warnings and
#
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 16:59 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
OK, comprehension fail on my part, sorry. Good to have them listed out
explicitly though, thanks for that. The fatal errors are definitely not good
things to be allowing through if we can avoid it.
Without checking, do you have a
On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc,
/work/i586-poky-linux/gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150-r4/packages-split/gcc/usr/libexec/gcc/i586-poky-linux/4.6.1/liblto_plugin.so
This should be packages with gcc
Op 1 jul 2011, om 19:25 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc,
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 19:33 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 1 jul 2011, om 19:25 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 7/1/11 12:16 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
On 07/01/2011 10:12 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
gcc-4.6.0+svnr175150, non dev contains .so, gcc,
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 8 23:51:06 2010 +0100
insane.bbclass: Relax fatal errors for now until we get have
time to work through the backlog
On Thursday 30 June 2011 16:11:29 Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 8 23:51:06 2010 +0100
insane.bbclass: Relax fatal errors for now
Op 30 jun 2011, om 17:33 heeft Paul Eggleton het volgende geschreven:
On Thursday 30 June 2011 16:11:29 Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 8 23:51:06 2010
On 06/30/2011 08:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 8 23:51:06 2010 +0100
insane.bbclass: Relax fatal errors for now until we get
On Thursday 30 June 2011 16:49:57 Koen Kooi wrote:
It's a white list, so:
# 0 - non dev contains .so
# 5 - .la contains installed=yes or reference to the workdir
# 7 - the desktop file is not valid
# 8 - .la contains reference to the workdir
# 9 - LDFLAGS ignored
Are warnings and
# 1
On 6/30/11 10:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date: Thu Jul 8 23:51:06 2010 +0100
insane.bbclass: Relax
Op 30 jun 2011, om 18:08 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 6/30/11 10:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725
Author: Richard Purdie rpur...@linux.intel.com
Date:
On 06/30/2011 01:35 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 30 jun 2011, om 18:08 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven:
On 6/30/11 10:58 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:11 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
These were turned off by:
commit fae8d5e985e9b05ce90f1eca434ad4dbf2259725 Author: Richard
15 matches
Mail list logo
