> -----Original Message----- > From: Burton, Ross [mailto:ross.bur...@intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:16 AM > To: Ian Geiser > Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH] mesa-dri: add extra dri drivers > > On 30 January 2013 13:26, <igei...@devonit.com> wrote: > > On x86 the ATI and NVidia drm drivers are valid to build. > > Currently there are _append_x86 and _append_x64 lines that explicitly > > add i915 and i965. For consistency I think that the ATI and NVidia > > drm driver should be added. In classic these were tunable via the > > machine configuration files. I would argue we should go back to that > > so we should make the DRIDRIVERS field something that can be defined > > there. > > > > * Made the DRIDRIVERS field overridable. > > * Add ATI and NVidia DRI drivers to the build list for > > x86 and x86_64. > > I'm not sure why we need to make this machine-tunable - we currently > build all drivers in libdrm (but split them between packages), so why > not just enable all working DRI drivers in Mesa and split them between > packages. > > Machine configurations can pull in specific driver packages (or all of > them) without making Mesa itself machine-specific. > > Can you send a V2 without the conditional assignment (unless you have > an argument for keeping it), with a commit message that just describes > the patch. No, I was just extending what was there so I have no real preference. I will need to check if it impacts non-x86 builds. I do not think it will be a problem, since most non-x86 systems have their own GL implementations. I think it will just enable swrast on ones that are not x86. I will resubmit with it set to auto where it will only build the appropriate drivers after I test. Thanks!
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
