On 08/21/2012 10:27 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Scott,
Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
change that I've been running for 3 weeks, and one that TomZ has tested
in his yocto BSP work on denzil.
It fixes some
On 12-08-23 03:18 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 01:48 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
On 12-08-22 1:27 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Scott,
Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
change that I've been r
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 01:48 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-08-22 1:27 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >> Scott,
> >>
> >> Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
> >> change that I've been running for 3 weeks, a
On 12-08-22 1:27 AM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
Scott,
Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
change that I've been running for 3 weeks, and one that TomZ has tested
in his yocto BSP work on denzil.
It fixes some BSP
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:10 -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
> change that I've been running for 3 weeks, and one that TomZ has tested
> in his yocto BSP work on denzil.
>
> It fixes some BSP use cases that involve setti
Scott,
Here's a fix for validate_branches that comes from a pending master
change that I've been running for 3 weeks, and one that TomZ has tested
in his yocto BSP work on denzil.
It fixes some BSP use cases that involve setting a specific SRCREV
on a base branch, so that a BSP branch that doesn'
