On Tuesday 06 December 2011 08:18:30 Koen Kooi wrote:
Omap3-sgx-modules has no place in OE-core, so it should get deleted.
Sounds good, would you mind sending a patch that does that?
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
On 02/12/11 11:20, Joshua Lock wrote:
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
This patch has now been merged into BitBake master.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project Johannes
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
in the
On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets
On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote:
On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
Per some discussion
Op 6 dec. 2011, om 03:13 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende geschreven:
On 05/12/11 14:55, Joshua Lock wrote:
On 05/12/11 14:50, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 11:20 -0800, Joshua Lock wrote:
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise
NOTE: this requires a patch I sent to the BitBake list[1] to error cleanly,
otherwise you'll see a Python backtrace and the build fail...
Per some discussion on the list recently this patch sets BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM
in the default-distrovars.inc so that missing checksums in recipes raises an
error.