Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt

2018-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 09:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie > wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > > this series is ok. Although dont like the fact its not upstream > > > yet > > >

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt

2018-04-06 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> this series is ok. Although dont like the fact its not upstream yet >> but it reduces glibc baggage for future. > > Were you able to find out if glibc

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt

2018-04-06 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 08:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > this series is ok. Although dont like the fact its not upstream yet > but it reduces glibc baggage for future. Were you able to find out if glibc will definitely do this? I think applying this nativesdk is the only thing we can do right now

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt

2018-04-06 Thread Khem Raj
this series is ok. Although dont like the fact its not upstream yet but it reduces glibc baggage for future. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:53 AM, Charles-Antoine Couret wrote: > Fedora 28 is introducing a breaking change where glibc and libcrypt are split. >

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/2] Split glibc and libcrypt

2018-04-06 Thread Charles-Antoine Couret
Fedora 28 is introducing a breaking change where glibc and libcrypt are split. libcrypt is now provided by libxcrypt as external library. It is backwards compatible, but not the converse. Currently Poky could not be compiled with Fedora 28 and the official yocto-uninative. The purpose of these