Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] RFC v3: provide 3.0.x and 3.1 libc headers

2011-11-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Richard, Here's v3 of the series, the details are below. I see no comments on v3. So I'm just bumping the thread. Should I send a separate pull request for this, or is this sufficient ? Bruce p.s. yes, I

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] RFC v3: provide 3.0.x and 3.1 libc headers

2011-11-01 Thread Saul Wold
On 11/01/2011 05:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Richard, Here's v3 of the series, the details are below. I see no comments on v3. So I'm just bumping the thread. Should I send a separate pull request for

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] RFC v3: provide 3.0.x and 3.1 libc headers

2011-11-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11-11-01 8:46 PM, Saul Wold wrote: On 11/01/2011 05:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Bruce Ashfield bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote: Richard, Here's v3 of the series, the details are below. I see no comments on v3. So I'm just bumping the thread. Should I

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/3] RFC v3: provide 3.0.x and 3.1 libc headers

2011-10-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard, Here's v3 of the series, the details are below. Changes since v2: - moved more code into the .inc file - modifed the python code to not import unnecessary functions and to use d.get/setVar. - Included an optional patch 3/3 to remove 2.6 based header recipes. Whether you want