[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2020-08-03 Thread Bruce Ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Hi all, This series contains two routine updates of 5.4. The -stable update and a backport to fix a perf build issue with the new binutils (as reported and debugged by Khem). The other two are features that I've been working on for the fall release. One is minor (the

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2020-03-04 Thread bruce . ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Hi all, As mentioned on the technical call yesterday, here's my latest set of 5.2 updates, 5.4 updates and more importantly, the removal of 5.2 from master. As usual, I'll continue to support and update 5.2, just without sending SRCREV updates to master. The last set of

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2019-12-29 Thread bruce . ashfield
From: Bruce Ashfield Hi all, Here's a few more linux-yocto changes that I queued while waiting for my previous batch to merge. There are two more 5.2 -stable updates, a gcc10 fix from Khem and a meta-data fix that was discussed on oe-core. I'll send a documenation update for the meta-data

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2016-12-06 Thread Trevor Woerner
On Fri 2016-12-02 @ 04:09:21 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > This pull request is mainly to fix a couple of bugs that were reported > on the mailing list recently, but it also includes some kernel version > updates that I *think* I sent previously. Thanks Bruce, I've tested these and they look good.

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2016-12-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Hi all, This pull request is mainly to fix a couple of bugs that were reported on the mailing list recently, but it also includes some kernel version updates that I *think* I sent previously. kern-tools: fix processing for no branch meta-data kernel-yocto: exit on non-zero return code Those

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2015-03-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard, Here's my next round of incremental fixes and updates. All are relatively minor, so there's no sense sitting on them while I work on some other changes. These two are tweaks to the Kconfig audit warnings that went into M3, and will remove a config warning and the other will not

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2013-05-31 Thread Saul Wold
On 05/31/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, While I continue to battle with gcc 4.8, I've got a collection of other fixes that don't need to wait. Here's part of those pending changes. - Remove the yocto 3.2 kernel, early in the Yocto 1.5 cycle as promised Did I miss a

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2013-05-31 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 15:14 +0900, Saul Wold wrote: On 05/31/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, While I continue to battle with gcc 4.8, I've got a collection of other fixes that don't need to wait. Here's part of those pending changes. - Remove the yocto 3.2

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2013-05-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 15:14 +0900, Saul Wold wrote: On 05/31/2013 12:28 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: Richard/Saul, While I continue to battle with gcc 4.8, I've got a collection of other fixes that

[OE-core] [PATCH 0/4] kernel-yocto: consolidated pull request

2013-05-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
Richard/Saul, While I continue to battle with gcc 4.8, I've got a collection of other fixes that don't need to wait. Here's part of those pending changes. - Remove the yocto 3.2 kernel, early in the Yocto 1.5 cycle as promised - Fix the reported issues with linux-yocto-custom recipes by