On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 07:51 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
So to be safe and give other directfb implementations a change, can
this PACKAGECONFIG option be named 'gtk-directfb' in DISTRO_FEATURES?
I don't think I quite understand what you're saying there. Can you
expand on why this would be a good
Op 9 dec. 2011, om 11:08 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 07:51 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
So to be safe and give other directfb implementations a change, can
this PACKAGECONFIG option be named 'gtk-directfb' in DISTRO_FEATURES?
I don't think I quite
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 11:25 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
gtk 2.x is one of the few places where directfb/x11/whatever conflict,
so if I want directfb support for sane things (gtk 3.x, qt, etc) the
current patch will make me jump through a ton of hoops.
Well, you can set:
# support both graphical
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 07:51 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 8 dec. 2011, om 22:59 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 17:12 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:55 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
The question is whether it makes sense to have
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
---
Op 8 dec. 2011, om 10:34 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
Since I
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:14 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 8 dec. 2011, om 10:34 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then
\
the configuration related to x11
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 11:14 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 8 dec. 2011, om 10:34 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then
\
the configuration related to x11
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:55 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
The question is whether it makes sense to have directfb and X based gtk
in the same builds and package feeds or not. I can see that it might be
desired and that it likely is possible.
This is true, though there's nothing to stop a distro
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 17:12 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:55 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
The question is whether it makes sense to have directfb and X based gtk
in the same builds and package feeds or not. I can see that it might be
desired and that it likely is
Op 8 dec. 2011, om 22:59 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 17:12 +, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 16:55 +, Richard Purdie wrote:
The question is whether it makes sense to have directfb and X based gtk
in the same builds and package feeds
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
[YOCTO #1674]
Signed-off-by: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
---
Op 7 dec. 2011, om 09:58 heeft Xiaofeng Yan het volgende geschreven:
From: Xiaofeng Yan xiaofeng@windriver.com
gtk run over x11 at current OE-core. If gtk want to run over directfb, then \
the configuration related to x11 should be disabled and directfb should be
enabled.
So what
13 matches
Mail list logo
