Op 10 nov. 2014, om 08:35 heeft Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com het
volgende geschreven:
On 11/10/2014 02:42 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
The docs say that IMAGE_INSTALL is for package_name. So I think it's
correct that it fails when you put recipe_name in it and sometimes
there isn't any
On 11/11/2014 05:02 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
It is not a bug when recipe foo.bb doesn't generate foo.ipk. Your changes
introduce needless churn and break upgrade paths only to cater to people making
wrong assumptions.
Except on purpose to not generate recipe_name package, the other
situation is
On 11/09/2014 02:53 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 7 nov. 2014, om 15:38 heeft Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
It avoids the do_rootfs
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:02:47AM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
On 11/09/2014 02:53 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 7 nov. 2014, om 15:38 heeft Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist,
On 11/10/2014 02:42 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
The docs say that IMAGE_INSTALL is for package_name. So I think it's
correct that it fails when you put recipe_name in it and sometimes
there isn't any package with the same name. It's the same as trying to
make RDEPENDS/DEPENDS entries to be
Op 7 nov. 2014, om 15:38 heeft Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += avahi
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += avahi
Why don't you fix your IMAGE_INSTALL instead?
[YOCTO #6937]
Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia
On 7 November 2014 14:38, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += avahi
Why don't you fix your
On 11/07/2014 10:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
On 7 November 2014 14:38, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com
mailto:martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 03:57:01PM +0800, Hongxu Jia wrote:
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the
provider.
The package avahi does not exist, so we use avahi-daemon as the provider.
It avoids the do_rootfs failure while IMAGE_INSTALL += avahi
[YOCTO #6937]
Signed-off-by: Hongxu Jia hongxu@windriver.com
---
meta/recipes-connectivity/avahi/avahi.inc | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff
10 matches
Mail list logo
