On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 10:03:52AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 09:35, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > In meta-openembedded the only other recipe using scons is
> > PNBLACKLIST[mongodb] = "Since bbclass scons convert to python3, build
> > mongodb failed"
> >
> > So 2/2 of the
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 09:35, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> In meta-openembedded the only other recipe using scons is
> PNBLACKLIST[mongodb] = "Since bbclass scons convert to python3, build mongodb
> failed"
>
> So 2/2 of the scons-using recipes in meta-openembedded so not work with
> the Python 3
On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 08:47:16AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 06:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > > Do we need the Python 2 variation of scons in oe-core, or even at all?
> >
> > Regarding the latter, do you see
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 06:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> > Do we need the Python 2 variation of scons in oe-core, or even at all?
>
> Regarding the latter, do you see what is needed for making gpsd in
> meta-oe working with the Python 3
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:51:35AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote:
> Do we need the Python 2 variation of scons in oe-core, or even at all?
Regarding the latter, do you see what is needed for making gpsd in
meta-oe working with the Python 3 variant?
Upstream seems to support it, but it fails to
Do we need the Python 2 variation of scons in oe-core, or even at all?
Ross
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 01:18, Oleksandr Kravchuk
wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kravchuk
> ---
> ...hon-scons-native_3.0.5.bb => python-scons-native_3.1.0.bb} | 0
> .../python/{python-scons_3.0.5.bb =>
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Kravchuk
---
...hon-scons-native_3.0.5.bb => python-scons-native_3.1.0.bb} | 0
.../python/{python-scons_3.0.5.bb => python-scons_3.1.0.bb} | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rename meta/recipes-devtools/python/{python-scons-native_3.0.5.bb =>
