On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 22:59 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
The latter sounds like what we'll need to do. I haven't looked at shadow
to see what kind of finessing is required though...
Fixing the immediate problem with shadow turned out to be rather
straightforward, see attached. However, with
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:50 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 22:59 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
The latter sounds like what we'll need to do. I haven't looked at shadow
to see what kind of finessing is required though...
Fixing the immediate problem with shadow turned out
I just tried using useradd.bbclass for the first time (in an effort to
make dbus installable on a readonly-rootfs) and it doesn't seem to be
working very well for me.
The root of my problem seems to be the code below. As far as I can
tell, what's happening is that process_root_flag() consumes
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:54 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
What is it depending on for the target? Is the shadow-utils or something now
required? That doesn't seem to make sense to me -- other then we need a
passwd/group/shadow/gshadow file to work with. As long as something can
provide
those,
On 9/1/11 11:58 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 11:54 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
What is it depending on for the target? Is the shadow-utils or something now
required? That doesn't seem to make sense to me -- other then we need a
passwd/group/shadow/gshadow file to work with.
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 12:25 -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
On 9/1/11 11:58 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
And, I guess, if you want to support online package management then it
does make some sense to have the shadow utils there. But I don't
need/want that in my configuration.
Does busybox or
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a chroot when invoked under pseudo:
* useradd
* groupadd
* usermod
* groupmod
* userdel
* groupdel
* passwd
* gpasswd
* pwconv
* pwunconv
* grpconv
* grpunconv
They
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:53 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a chroot when invoked under pseudo:
Rather than patching the code for all these utilities, can't you just
On 01/06/11 10:47, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:53 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a chroot when invoked under pseudo:
Rather than patching the code
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 13:34 +0100, Martyn Welch wrote:
On 01/06/11 10:47, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:53 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a
On 06/01/2011 02:47 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:53 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a chroot when invoked under pseudo:
Rather than patching the
On 6/1/11 12:43 PM, Scott Garman wrote:
On 06/01/2011 02:47 AM, Phil Blundell wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:53 -0700, Scott Garman wrote:
This adds a -native recipe for the shadow utilities.
The custom --root option allows the the following utilities to be
run within a chroot when invoked
12 matches
Mail list logo
