Op 10 sep. 2012, om 19:20 heeft Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com het
volgende geschreven:
As XCB is a hard requirement for libX11, and libX11-xcb.so is a deprecated 3KB
.so, it's not worth splitting it into a separate package.
What's the upgrade path? This commit will create a clash because
On 11 September 2012 07:22, Koen Kooi k...@dominion.thruhere.net wrote:
What's the upgrade path? This commit will create a clash because now 2
packages will provide the same file. Is that pain really worth it?
The pain is just a matter of some dependencies I - again :( -
forgot to add. The
As XCB is a hard requirement for libX11, and libX11-xcb.so is a deprecated 3KB
.so, it's not worth splitting it into a separate package.
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton ross.bur...@intel.com
---
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11-trim_1.5.0.bb |2 +-
meta/recipes-graphics/xorg-lib/libx11.inc
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 18:20 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
As XCB is a hard requirement for libX11, and libX11-xcb.so is a deprecated 3KB
.so, it's not worth splitting it into a separate package.
3kb is 3kb. If its deprecated, things will stop linking with it and
nothing will depend on it and
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 09:36:13PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2012-09-10 at 18:20 +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
As XCB is a hard requirement for libX11, and libX11-xcb.so is a deprecated
3KB
.so, it's not worth splitting it into a separate package.
3kb is 3kb. If its deprecated,
