On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 13:33 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 13:25 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> > From: André Draszik
> >
> > Avoid adding flex-native or bison-native to the sysroot without a
> > specific
> > dependency in the recipe. This means
On Tue, 2018-05-22 at 13:25 +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> From: André Draszik
>
> Avoid adding flex-native or bison-native to the sysroot without a
> specific
> dependency in the recipe. This means indirect dependencies
> (e.g. X -> Y -> binutils-cross -> flex-native) no
From: André Draszik
Avoid adding flex-native or bison-native to the sysroot without a specific
dependency in the recipe. This means indirect dependencies
(e.g. X -> Y -> binutils-cross -> flex-native) no longer meet the
dependency incidentally. This improves determinism
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 05:36:54PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 10:33 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
> > Was this patch ever merged? I don't see it in master - were there any
> > problems
> > or concerns?
>
> There was some kind of failure in testing on
On Tue, 2018-04-10 at 10:33 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Was this patch ever merged? I don't see it in master - were there any
> problems
> or concerns?
There was some kind of failure in testing on the autobuilder which made
me abandon it, I can't remember what it was though
Richard,
Was this patch ever merged? I don't see it in master - were there any problems
or concerns?
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 05:01:35PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> This avoids adding flex-native or bison-native to the sysroot without a
> specific
> dependency in the recipe and means
This avoids adding flex-native or bison-native to the sysroot without a specific
dependency in the recipe and means indirect dependencies (e.g. X -> Y ->
binutils-cross -> flex-native)
no longer met the dependency incidentally. This improves determinism and avoid
build failures when people switch