Re: [OE-core] [PATCH RFC] bitbake.conf/base.bbclass: Drop PRINC support

2014-03-04 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 22:44 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: PRINC is no longer needed since we have the PR service instead which people should be using. Drop the PRINC code. Signed-off-by: Richard

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH RFC] bitbake.conf/base.bbclass: Drop PRINC support

2014-03-03 Thread Martin Jansa
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 05:39:21PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: PRINC is no longer needed since we have the PR service instead which people should be using. Drop the PRINC code. Many layers are still using it and there wasn't enough of PV bumps to remove them :(. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH RFC] bitbake.conf/base.bbclass: Drop PRINC support

2014-03-03 Thread Mark Hatle
On 3/2/14, 11:39 AM, Richard Purdie wrote: PRINC is no longer needed since we have the PR service instead which people should be using. Drop the PRINC code. Will dropping this support break someone who is moving from a prior version of oe-core (i.e. will any of the PRs go backwards?) --Mark

Re: [OE-core] [PATCH RFC] bitbake.conf/base.bbclass: Drop PRINC support

2014-03-03 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: PRINC is no longer needed since we have the PR service instead which people should be using. Drop the PRINC code. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org Nack! Layers still use

[OE-core] [PATCH RFC] bitbake.conf/base.bbclass: Drop PRINC support

2014-03-02 Thread Richard Purdie
PRINC is no longer needed since we have the PR service instead which people should be using. Drop the PRINC code. Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org --- diff --git a/meta/classes/base.bbclass b/meta/classes/base.bbclass index 3e9051c..3cbf2cb 100644 ---